See Meng Wanzhoufas circle of friends again: Thank you for your colleagues.

category:Society
 See Meng Wanzhoufas circle of friends again: Thank you for your colleagues.


Global Network reported that on the morning of September 23, Vancouver, Canada, Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou was again tried in the British Columbia High Court for illegal detention. On the morning of Beijing Time 24, Huaweis Heart Sound Community also released a screenshot of Meng Wanzhous circle of friends. In this circle of friends, Meng expressed his gratitude to you and matched two photos of himself before the court that day.

The following is the full text of Meng Wanzhous circle of friends:

Thank you all for bringing one meter of sunshine into my heart.

(Screenshot of Meng Wanzhou Friends Circle, Picture Source: Huawei Heart and Sound Community)

This is not the first time Mengs voice came out after he was illegally arrested in Canada. On December 11, 2018, after Mengs release on bail, he sent a circle of friends to report peace. At that time, Meng wrote: I am in Vancouver, have returned to the family, I am proud of China, I am proud of the motherland! Thank you for everyone who cares about me. Meng late boat

Earlier reports:

Meng Wanzhou appeared in court again with a smile, and the extradition case entered the substantive stage of trial.

On the morning of September 23, Vancouver, Canada, the extradition case of Ms. Meng Wanzhou, Chief Financial Officer of Huawei Company, was heard again in the British Columbia High Court.

At about 9:30 a.m., Ms. Meng Wanzhou, dressed in a purple skirt, came out of her home with a smile and greeted the reporters waiting in the rain at the gate of the yard.

Meng Yanzhou was relaxed before he appeared in court. Figure Source: Hong Kong Eastern Network

Meng Wanzhou appeared in court again. Tuyuan: South China Morning Post

Unlike previous procedural trials, extradition cases have entered a substantive stage from today, that is to say, both the prosecution and the defense will debate the evidence and key issues in the case.

Meng Wanzhous ankle was locked with a monitoring device. Figure Source: Hong Kong Eastern Network

A spokesman for Huawei, Benjamin Howes, has just issued a statement to the media expressing his belief in Mengs innocence, but it is not convenient to disclose more information. The lawyersgroup expressed confidence that the Canadian courts could decide the extradition case of Meng Wanzhou impartially and independently.

The details of the statement are as follows_

As you know, the court is hearing the matter, so it is not convenient for us to make specific comments. We fully support Ms. Meng and believe that she is innocent. We are also fully convinced that the independence and impartiality of Canadian judicial process will surely give her back her innocence.

Asyouknow, thisissueisbefore the Courtand, assuch, itwouldnot beappropriate to providedetailedcomment. WesupportMs. Mengcomplete. Webelievesheisinnocentofallallegations. Wehaveeveryconfidence that will be vindicated with the pendency and fairness of the Canadian judicial processes.

Mengs case of illegal detention reopened. Mengs team accused the Canadian government and the United States of America.

Vancouver is unlikely to be the front line in the game between superpowers, CBC reported Wednesday. Meng Wanzhou, an executive of Huawei, will return to the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the same day. Her appearance in a few monthstime will undoubtedly attract global attention again. The Canadian authorities, who plan to extradite her to the United States, will face a new round of struggle, according to a Bloomberg News agency. At the same time, Canadian elections will be held next month. The people of the country are aware of the need to elect a suitable prime minister to deal with an unprecedented confrontation with China in the future.

Canadian Globe Post reported Tuesday that this week in two independent courts, judges will listen to Mengs lawyer teams arguments in a two-pronged refusal to extradite case. On the one hand, Mengs lawyer will ask the prosecution to disclose the documents and details of her detention and arrest at Vancouver International Airport on December 1 last year at an eight-day hearing. According to the analysis, this is not an extradition hearing, but these information will be evidence of Mengs complaint against Canadian authorities for violating regulations and requesting the termination of extradition procedures. Mengs lawyers will accuse the Canadian Border Service (CBSA) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) of violating her constitutional rights during their arrest. Bangladeshs lawyers accused Canadian officials of being agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and said the only question left is to what extent the FBI has participated in the so-calledplan.

According to the CBC, Vancouver is unlikely to be the front line in the game between the two global superpowers. But last year, Canada arrested Meng Wanzhou at the request of the United States and tried to extradite her to the United States for trial. Canada was placed in conflict between China and the United States. Reported that before the hearing began on 23, Mengs lawyer team submitted a document to the court accusing the United States tried to use these extradition procedures (between the United States and Canada) to serve its own economic and political interests and hijacked Meng as a bargaining chip in the Sino-US trade war. Meng was arrested at Vancouver Airport on December 1 last year when he was transferring. Trump, in an interview with Reuters on December 11, said publicly that he was willing to intervene in Mengs case if it would help China and the United States reach a trade agreement.

In addition, Mengs lawyer team said that the US and Canadian authorities used CBSAs special detention right to conduct a secret criminal investigation on Mengs late boat. A CBSA official inquired about Huaweis business in Iran while searching Mengs luggage. RCMP intended to arrest Mengs late boat on the plane, but changed for some special reasons. The original intention. Lawyers point out that all of these factors constitute an abuse of procedure and are sufficient to nullify the entire case. In this case, one can reasonably speculate that the FBI has been in contact with the Federal Justice Department of Canada, RCMP and CBSA in this incident, but the relevant materials have been concealed. Our client believes that CBSA and RCMP are driven by the interests of the FBI and other U.S. government agencies and may be guided by them. She is in Vancouver. The International Airport was illegally detained.

The Global Post quoted Vancouver immigration lawyer Richard Kurand as saying on the 22nd that the focus of the hearing was to ask for more information to be disclosed. There is a lot to be gained from civil cases, but not from criminal or extradition cases. You can extract ammunition from civil cases. Insert in the handling of extradition cases. These new information and documents, such as CBSA interrogation videos, may open the door for a re-examination of the entire case, the expert said. If there is new and important evidence that Mengs constitutional rights have been violated, the Canadian Attorney General and Attorney General may reconsider the extradition decision. Vancouver lawyer Brock Martin told the Globe Post that in Canadas extradition cases, civil cases with similar focus are unusual, but in Mengs case, unusualness is normal.

With more and more details being disclosed, the illegal arrest of Meng Wanzhou by Canadian authorities has been increasingly questioned. Gary Potin, a Vancouver lawyer, saw a video of Bangladeshs detention at the airport, Reuters reported Wednesday. He said there were doubts about whether the rights of Bangladeshs late boat had been violated. CBC23 quoted Paul Evans, a professor at the University of British Columbia and honorary director of the Asian Institute, as saying that this weeks proceedings are most noteworthy as to whether extradition could be used as a rent-seeking and long-arm jurisdictional pursuit tool in the interests of the United States, when people talk about who is undermining the rule of law and the international community. We should not evade what the United States did in pursuit of Mengs late boat, which not only frightened the Chinese, but also the Europeans.

The CBC said that Mengs extradition hearing will begin in January next year and that the case is unlikely to end before the end of 2020. But the impact of the case is clear: China has imposed restrictions on the import of rapeseed, pork and beef from Canada, two Canadians accused of drug trafficking have been sentenced to death in China, and two Canadian citizens have been arrested on espionage charges in China. China denies that all this is related to Mengs case, but does not hide its dissatisfaction with Canadas assistance in the arrest of Mengs late boat by the United States. Mengs arrest plunged Canadas relationship with its second largest trading partner into the darkest period since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1970, Bloomberg said Tuesday. Whoever wants to win next months federal elections will face one of the toughest challenges.

(function () {(window. slotbydup = window. slotbydup | []). push ({id:6374560, container:ssp_6374560, size:300,250, display:inlay-fix, async: true});} (); source of this article: Global Network author: Zhu Mengying responsible editor: Xiaoqi_N6799