Hangzhou 10,000 yuan cat hunting heated discussion media: lost more important things

category:Hot
 Hangzhou 10,000 yuan cat hunting heated discussion media: lost more important things


Recently, the owner of a small district in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, lost his cat. The owner paid 10,000 yuan for cat hunting. But after the owner Niu Ma found the cat and sent it to the owners, the owner of the cat returned home with a small gift to thank him, but did not raise the reward. When asked in time, the owner explained that other owners notified her of the news, so the reward had been given to others. However, a group chat record shows that someone helped the owner pull a trick and you said you called your neighbor. (Qianjiang Evening News, 23 September)

Beijing Youth Daily: Why Should Small Benefits Abolish Big Righteousness

Heavy rewards are offered, but not happy. Too much cunning and calculating are included in it, which makes the warm heart of helping each other in the neighborhood instantly become a farce. After the break-up, all parties involved spoke in a rather high tone. Mother Niu said that they are neighbors, thinking that if a couple of people want to give money, they must not accept it. Its underlying meaning was now out of the investigation, purely for the sake of no money; and the owner also revealed that ten thousand yuan of cat reward has been distributed to those who provide clues. Man, trying to prove that he is not a man who does not believe in words............................................... Authorities continue to routine, melon eaters have long been judged, the reward for cats drama triggered a heated debate far beyond imagination.

In our lives, similar disputes caused by reward promises are not rare. From the legislative point of view, the relevant legal arrangements can not be said to be ambiguous. The Property Law stipulates that if the obligee offers a reward to search for the lost property, the obligee shall fulfill his obligations in accordance with his promise when he receives the lost property. But the real complexity lies in the link of fact finding. Taking this case as an example, the owner said that some people have provided clues for this cow mother is actually very difficult to falsify. And even if you really want to sue for remuneration, in accordance with the principle of burden of proof distribution, Niu Mama must prove that it is his own clue to let the owner get back the kitten - which is troublesome to think about.

Comparing with the situation in which the picker returns the lost property directly to the owner, there are great uncertainties in the fulfillment of the offer promise and the payment of the reward in the case of providing clues. Needless to say, reward incentive is an important driving force for people to help find people and things. The case of cat-hunting fundamentally demonstrates the fragility of this empty cheque. Individual losers save reward by their smarts, while more losers may face the embarrassment of no one should pay out reward in the future. It is impossible to abolish righteousness because of small profits.

Qilu Evening News: Making the Lack of Social Integrity Worse

There are many reward advertisements like cat, dog or lost property, and person-seeking advertisements, but some people have weak legal consciousness and promise to pay more when they issue reward advertisements. When someone fulfills the reward advertisement requirements, they meet the reward conditions, but turn their faces and refuse to accept the bill. Some people will also be tender a point, such as giving a certain reward to the person who fulfilled the specified behavior, but not fully fulfilling the promise; some people will find excuses not to fulfill, such as saying that someone has found first, the other party does not have the reward conditions, and so on. This kind of behavior of not fulfilling ones own promise is already an act of dishonesty, which violates the spirit of contract. And the unrealized reward advertisement will also increase peoples mistrust and make the lack of social integrity more serious.

New Beijing News: Lost more important things

The lost owners ten thousand yuan cat hunting is not just a simple topic of whether or not to get paid for picking up things. Article 112 of the Property Law stipulates that if the obligee offers a reward for finding the lost property, he shall fulfill his obligations in accordance with his promises when collecting the lost property. This is also the maintenance of the basic principle of laws trustworthiness to promises. Specifically, since the owner publicly issued a cat-hunting notice and offered a reward of 10,000 yuan, he should fulfill his promise to help find the cats cow mother and also have the right to ask for a reward.

In many cases, most of the collectors will refuse high rewards, but the premise is that the owner needs to express his sincerity actively and give the collector due respect.

Community is a community tribe. The interaction density of residents is high, which also forms inextricably linked, and requires mutual trust to coordinate the relationship between them. To promise but not to practice reveals that ones moral character is damaged. Reward is no doubt a play on goodness, even if the cat is found back, it will not pay off.

In fact, another piece of news yesterday is worth pondering: a woman in Hunan Province took off her ring worth more than 30,000 yuan and left it on the dining table for inconvenience while eating crabs in a restaurant. Four sanitation workers searched for tons of garbage before recovering it. The woman thanked the sanitation workers and gave them bottles of water.

This, of course, is also a warm smell, which also shows the warmth of the society. But collecting garbage is a sanitation workers job. Looking for rings from garbage is not. It is somewhat distressing to comfort the sanitation workers who are struggling to find rubbish with a few bottles of water.

(function () {(window. slotbydup = window. slotbydup | []). push ({id:6374560, container:ssp_6374560, size:300,250, display:inlay-fix, async: true});} (); there may be no clear criteria for how much money should be paid for picking up, but there are still some common understandings among them: for example, to do, to speak with confidence; and for example, to be reasonable. To compensate the other party for the cost of missed work, to pay the corresponding remuneration for the work paid, and so on. In short, in my opinion, a thank you is necessary to help others, but it can not replace all. Sometimes respect and gratitude in action are more important than words. This is not a moral kidnapping, on the contrary, it is a kind of moral kidnapping to insist that the other party pick up the money without ignorance and obligate the cat to help you find it back and find the ring for you to turn over the garbage. Its the same thing that the other person is kind, kind-hearted and helpful, but its not reasonable. The beloved cat and ring have returned. This kind of benefit is the result of other peoples efforts. They know how to be grateful, think differently, and give some feedback. At least they keep the promise of reward. This requirement cant be overstated, even the basic bottom line. Source: Xiao Qi_N6799, responsible editor of Peoples Network

There may be no clear criteria for how much money should be paid for picking up things, but there are some common understandings among them: for example, to do so, to be trustworthy; for example, to compensate the other party for the cost of missed work reasonably, and to pay the corresponding remuneration for the labor paid, and so on. In short, in my opinion, a thank you is necessary to help others, but it can not replace all. Sometimes respect and gratitude in action are more important than words.

This is not a moral kidnapping, on the contrary, it is a kind of moral kidnapping to insist that the other party pick up the money without ignorance and obligate the cat to help you find it back and find the ring for you to turn over the garbage. Its the same thing that the other person is kind, kind-hearted and helpful, but its not reasonable. The beloved cat and ring have returned. This kind of benefit is the result of other peoples efforts. They know how to be grateful, think differently, and give some feedback. At least they keep the promise of reward. This requirement cant be overstated, even the basic bottom line.