On July 8 this year, the peoples court of Qianan City, Hebei Province, ruled that Li Zhimin (male) and Liu Mouli (female) were not guilty of blackmail and bigamy. According to Dabai News, Li Zhimin was born in 1966. In recent years, he has frequently reported various illegal and disciplinary clues of local administrative officials through the Internet from the media, and has been publicly reported by many media, including Xinhua News Agency. As a result of the handling of several reported officials, he became an influential internet celebrity in the local area. On April 9, 2015, Li Zhimin was detained by the Luanxian Public Security Bureau of Hebei Province on the grounds that Li Zhimin and Liu Mouli, for the purpose of illegal possession, threatened each other (Yanshan Iron Mine) into fear, demanded 900,000 yuan of public and private property, and Li Zhimin had a spouse and remarried Liu. On May 5 of the same year, the two men were arrested with the approval of the Luanxian Peoples Procuratorate.
Earlier, Li Zhimin told Bai Xin that he would apply for state compensation, and that relevant staff should be held accountable. In addition, Li Zhimin also said that in the future, he would continue to report the phenomenon of social injustice and become a fighter, I believe in the law, because the law also gives me a justice.
According to an application for state compensation obtained by Dabai News, Li Zhimins claims for compensation include: compensation for infringement of personal freedom for 1,471,016.64 yuan, spiritual damages for 2 million yuan; compensation for the cost of defending rights for lawyers, transportation and family members for missed work for 500,000 yuan; compensation for follow-up treatment for 500,000 yuan; compensation for arrest and seizure Loss caused by loss of relevant property is 100,000 yuan; compensation for loss caused by termination of contract by insured person is 250,000 yuan; apologize publicly to claimant for compensation.
According to the application, the original Luanxian Public Security Bureau detained the claimant on April 9, 2015 on suspicion of extortion, while illegally copying and seizing property. The former Luanxian Procuratorate prosecuted the claimant for extortion and bigamy on November 24, 2015. After hearing the case, the latter sentenced the claimant to 11 years and 9 monthsimprisonment on May 16, 2016. The claimant refused to appeal to the Tangshan Intermediate Court, which made a ruling on 31 May 2017, revoked the original judgment and sent the case back to the original Luan County Court for retrial, and designated Qianan City Court for trial on 17 July 2017. On July 8, 2017, Qianan City Court issued criminal judgment No. 396 on the beginning of Ji0283 sentence. The claimant was acquitted and the claimant was released without guilt. Up to now, the claimant has been detained for 1552 days in Luanzhou detention center.
According to the application, according to the provisions of Articles 17 and 21 of the State Compensation Law, the Luanzhou City Court (the former Luanzhou County Court) is the compensation obligation organ of the claimant for wrongful detention, and should compensate the claimant for infringement of personal freedom and spiritual damages according to law.
u2014u2014 Hebei Reporting Red Man Li Zhimin case time line:
On May 5, 2015, the two men were arrested with the approval of the Luanxian Peoples Procuratorate.
On November 24, 2015, Luanxian Procuratorate filed a public prosecution with Luanxian Peoples Court.
On May 16, 2016, Luanxian Peoples Court sentenced Li Zhimin to 11 years and 9 monthsimprisonment for extortion and bigamy, and Liu Mouli to 5 years and 9 months imprisonment for extortion and bigamy. They appealed.
On May 31, 2017, the Tangshan Intermediate Peoples Court ruled that the case should be remanded for retrial.
On July 17, 2017, Tangshan Intermediate Peoples Court appointed Qianan Peoples Court to hear the case.
On September 4, 2017, Qianan Peoples Procuratorate filed a public prosecution with Qianan Peoples Court.
On January 18, 2018, Qianan Peoples Court opened a court hearing the case.