Discussion on Qingdao Publishing No. 1 Violating Typhoon Warning
As of the afternoon of September 9, the article entitled Typhoon Really Comes! which was published by Qingdao News Network on the 8th, is expected to affect Qingdao on Saturdays or bring heavy rainstorms. The first sentence of the article, which arouses controversy, is: Typhoon warning issued according to Qingdao Meteorological Station; News of Qingdao Peoples Government The report was reproduced later in the original text. On the evening of 8th, the official micro-blog Qingdao Meteorology of Qingdao professional meteorological observatory publicly issued an article accusing Qingdao of publishing the headline of Qingdao Meteorology, believing that the other party had issued typhoon warning in violation of regulations, and pointing out that only typhoon track prediction is currently issued by Qingdao Meteorological Observatory. No typhoon warning was issued. It is believed that Qingdao Publication as the official information release channel of the government, changes the forecast of Qingdao Meteorology in the dissemination of meteorological information, and emphasizes that if typhoon warning is issued, the city will start emergency plans, including flood control, resettlement and so on, which are very serious matters.
Qingdao Meteorology deleted the microblog on the evening of the 8th. But after the release of the microblog, it quickly triggered a heated discussion among netizens, and related screenshots of the content of the microblog also spread rapidly. After the network fermentation, Qingdao Published apologized publicly on the 9th through its official micro-blog and headline, expressing that it would take precautions, strengthen the learning and understanding of meteorological knowledge, standardize the management of the publishing platform, and prevent such incidents from happening again. The original publisher of the manuscript, the relevant person in charge of Qingdao News Network, said that the manuscript was picked up by a trainee journalist who would deal with it in accordance with the relevant management regulations of news interview. The difference between the word prediction and early warning violates the law in serious cases.
It is understood that although there is only one word difference between forecast and early warning, there is a world-wide difference in the meaning of public weather forecast and disastrous weather warning. If they are misused, they may even violate the law seriously. Article 22 of the Meteorological Law of the Peoples Republic of China stipulates that the State shall implement a unified system for issuing public meteorological forecasts and warnings of disastrous weather. Meteorological stations and stations affiliated to competent meteorological departments at all levels shall, in accordance with their duties, issue public meteorological forecasts and warnings of disastrous weather to the public, and timely supplement or revise them in accordance with the weather changes. No other organization or individual may issue public meteorological forecasts or warnings of disastrous weather to the public. Article 25 stipulates that radio, television, newspapers, telecommunications and other media must use timely meteorological information provided by meteorological stations affiliated to the competent meteorological authorities to disseminate meteorological forecasts and warnings of disastrous weather to the society, and indicate the time of publication and the names of meteorological stations; Article 38 stipulates that unlawful publication of public gas to the society is required. If the media, such as radio, television, newspapers and telecommunications, disseminate public meteorological forecasts and warnings of disastrous weather to the public without using timely meteorological information provided by meteorological stations affiliated to the competent meteorological authorities, the relevant meteorological authorities shall, in accordance with their authority, order corrections and give warnings, which may be concurrently punished by 50,000 yuan. A fine of less than RMB. In a telephone interview with reporters, the head of the office of Qingdao Meteorological Bureau said that the typhoon is about to affect Qingdao. I hope you will focus on disaster prevention and mitigation: As we all know, such hype is not good. In itself, they wrote the forecast information as early warning, maybe it was a mistake. Lets also strengthen communication and do a good job of science popularization propaganda. We still want to do a good job of early warning service together. At present, the big enemy is facing a typhoon, so we should take it seriously. What is the standard of typhoon warning signal? Despite the controversial events, what is the standard of typhoon warning signal? It is also a question in the hearts of many netizens. Jiang Dunshuang, chief forecaster of Qingdao Meteorological Observatory, gave a detailed answer:
Jiang Dunshuang: Typhoon warning signals are divided into four levels, blue, yellow, orange and red. These four warning signals have their own standards, such as typhoon blue warning signals. The standard is within 24 hours, which may or has been affected by tropical cyclones. The average wind power in coastal or land areas is above 6 levels, or gust level 8. Above and may continue; Typhoon yellow warning signal standard is within 24 hours, may or has been affected by tropical cyclones, coastal or land average wind power above 8, or gust above 10 and may continue; Typhoon orange warning signal standard is that within 12 hours may or has been affected by tropical cyclones, coastal or coastal or The average wind power on land is above 10, or gust is above 12 and may last; the red warning signal of typhoon is within 6 hours, which may or has been affected by tropical cyclone; the average wind power on coast or land is above 12, or gust is above 14 and may last.
Qingdao Meteorological Anger Qingdao Published Illegal Lichma Typhoon Warning
The official Weibo of Qingdao Professional Meteorological Observatory in Shandong Province @Qingdao Meteorological Observatory sent an article on the evening of August 8 accusing the Information Office of Qingdao Peoples Government of Qingdao of issuing the headline number Qingdao Published, believing that the other party violated the rules and issued typhoon warn
At 8:00 pm on the 8th, the staff in charge of operating the official micro-blog @Qingdao News Office of Qingdao Municipal Peoples Government told Pengmei News that the aforementioned typhoon warning information came from Qingdao News Network, and then the Qingdao Publication headline forwarded the information and contacted the editor responsible for operating the headline for processing. However, the staff member did not specify how it would be handled.