Questions on the Enrollment Examination of Teachers in the Old City of Hebei Province: Publishing 2 Edition Report Sheets in 5 Hours

category:Society
 Questions on the Enrollment Examination of Teachers in the Old City of Hebei Province: Publishing 2 Edition Report Sheets in 5 Hours


Within two days after the announcement of the results of the teacher recruitment examination, Zheng Lei, 27, had joined three rights-defending groups, in which more than 300 people, like him, disagreed with the published scores.

The exam, which began at 9:00 a.m. on July 20, lasted two hours. The subjects of the exam were Chinese, English and Mathematics. The number of reference persons in the three subjects was nearly 2,000. The test results were first announced at 3:00 a.m. on July 21, and the second was announced five hours later.

Comparing the results of the two editions published by the candidates, the reporter found that the math scores of many candidates were different. For the first time, the scores of the first examinee in Qinghan Central School were 64 points, for the second time, 84 points, 20 points more; for the first time, the scores of the first examinee in Jianguo Central School were 71 points, and for the second time, 56 points, 15 points less.

It is worth noting that in the announcement of the test results, there are also some cases in which the candidates who did not take the single-subject examination of mathematics have achieved results. Zheng Lei introduced that in addition to the single subject of mathematics, there are also problems in the examination scores of Chinese subjects. The single choice questions of Chinese test papers scored 3 points for each question, but the candidates scored 20 points or 40 points for the choice questions. The number of scores can not be divided.

Liu Lin (not her real name) recalled that the invigilator in her exam room did not let the students sign in and check whether the exam questions were sealed, so she asked the questions directly. Candidates who took part in Chinese or English single-subject examinations also recalled that they did not check whether the papers were sealed. Zheng Lei, who took part in the Chinese single subject examination, also found that the answer card was not designed in the order of the number of questions. I asked the invigilator at that time, and he said that all questions related to the examination were not answered. Zheng Lei said.

It is understood that there is no clear regulation on the discipline of supervisory examination in compiling teacher recruitment examination, but according to relevant regulations, invigilators shall not unlock unopened examination papers, answer sheets, etc., or sealed examination papers, answer sheets and answer cards after the examination, otherwise, the examination authorities, examination authorities or relevant departments shall recommend that they do so without authorization. Relocation from examination posts shall not be allowed to engage in examination work, and corresponding sanctions shall be imposed.

At 8:00 a.m. on July 21, after the publication of the second edition of mathematics scores, many candidates came to the Gucheng County Bureau of Education to check the scores. Candidate Chen Li (a pseudonym) received a response that the official does not provide standard answers and the third party with qualifications is responsible for marking the papers. When Chen Li asked the third party to provide the answers, the staff of the bureau did not answer.

The second edition also published the Notice on Auditing and Correcting the Ranking of Mathematics Written Test Results. The announcement from the office of the Leading Group of Open Recruitment in Gucheng County said that after verification, due to improper data pasting in the ranking of the written test scores of teachersrecruitment, the published written test scores of math candidates were wrong, and apologized to the vast number of math candidates.

Later, the official website of Gucheng County Education Bureau issued the Notice on the written examination results and the list of interviewees which showed that the publication period was from July 21 to July 25.

On July 24, the reporter called the Education Bureau of Gucheng County by public consultation telephone to inquire about the publication of the two editions of mathematics results. The caller said that he was only temporary to help, and the staff were helping candidates to inquire about the results, and informed the County Education Bureau office telephone.

The staff of the Propaganda Department of the Gucheng County Committee said that the leading group jointly established by the county education bureau, the County Personnel Bureau and the county discipline Commission supervisory committee could ensure fairness and openness. This pasting error was a complete work error, and the next solution needed to be decided by the leading group.

The staff explained that the examination was scored by a third party, and according to the test paper stipulated by the Leading Group, its not too late, in order to ensure the results on the day of the examination, the teacher worked for more than ten hours continuously, and the overload was too heavy for a moment and the pasting error occurred negligently. He said that at present, only one subject of mathematics has made mistakes, and the specific proportion of mistakes should be further verified by the county education bureau. When the reporter mentioned that some candidates did not take the exam but achieved results, the staff said that there is no such situation at present, the first time the results were published because of pasting errors. The staff member denied that the invigilator had not asked the students to verify the sealing and signature of the examination papers before the examination. He said that he would consult the leading group of the Bureau of Education for further verification. Source: Responsible Editor of China Youth Daily: Liu Yuxin_NBJS7825

The staff explained that the examination was scored by a third party, and according to the test paper stipulated by the Leading Group, its not too late, in order to ensure the results on the day of the examination, the teacher worked for more than ten hours continuously, and the overload was too heavy for a moment and the pasting error occurred negligently. He said that at present, only one subject of mathematics has made mistakes, and the specific proportion of mistakes should be further verified by the county education bureau.

When the reporter mentioned that some candidates did not take the exam but achieved results, the staff said that there is no such situation at present, the first time the results were published because of pasting errors. The staff member denied that the invigilator had not asked the students to verify the sealing and signature of the examination papers before the examination. He said that he would consult the leading group of the Bureau of Education for further verification.