The man sentenced to blocking the road and beating the teacher signed an appeal against his wife: reporting the teachers corporal punishment

category:Society
 The man sentenced to blocking the road and beating the teacher signed an appeal against his wife: reporting the teachers corporal punishment


After the verdict was handed down in the morning, the judge asked (Chang Renyao) if he wanted to appeal. He immediately saidyes, with a firm attitude. Fu Jian, Chang Renyaos defense lawyer, told Peng Mei News that he had met Chang Renyao in the detention house in the afternoon. The latter was still emotional and signed an appeal.

Fu Jian explained that if the defendant refuses to accept the first instance judgment, he may appeal to Luanchuan County Peoples Court or Luoyang Intermediate Peoples Court of Henan Province within 10 days from the second day of receiving the judgment. The Intermediate Peoples Court of Luoyang City will conclude the trial within two months after receiving the materials and make a decision to withdraw or change the judgment.

Family: Teachers will be held accountable and corporal punishment will be reported.

Peng Mei Newss appeal from Chen Xizhi shows that the appellant Chang Renyao claims that the facts of the first instance are unclear and the evidence is insufficient, and requests that the original sentence be revoked and sent back for retrial or that the sentence be changed according to law. There are other new circumstances that can be lightly punished.

The petition said that the facts of the first instance were enlarged and the complaint between the appellant and Zhang Moulin, the teacher who was beaten, was characterized as disrespect to the teachers of the whole country; the incident of blocking the road and beating people happened accidentally, which was a sudden passion. When the appellant saw Zhang Moulins familiar face, he remembered all kinds of inhuman treatment he had suffered in the school, and then. Emotional uncontrollability, the occurrence of beatings, a total of four slaps, followed by questioning, and then persuaded by the public to suspend; and Zhang Moulin after the accident is not harmful, the relevant video was spread unexpectedly, not the appellants original intention.

In his appeal, Chang Renyao cited several examples of being corporal punished by Zhang Moulin during his schooling, claiming to have caused psychological trauma and shadows in his growth. It is not advisable to suppress violence with violence, but moral condemnation can not rise to punishment at the legal level. Chang Renyao stated that during the months of detention, he deeply realized his misconduct and knew that his behavior was illegal. In the courts, they have always apologized to the victims for their actions, and have always expressed their willingness to plead guilty and confess punishment if they constitute a crime.

The Appellant maintains that the sentencing opinions of the public prosecution organs are from one and a half years to two and a half years. After trial, the sentences can be lightened or mitigated. According to the Guiding Opinions on Sentencing, the sentencing of the appellant to criminal detention or probation conforms to the principle of unity of crime, responsibility and punishment.

The suspension of a crime can be punished below the statutory penalty. The suggestion of pleading guilty and pleading guilty is reduced by 40%, the fault of the victim (Zhang Moulin) is reduced by 30%, and the suggestion of actively compensating the loss of the victim is reduced by 20%. The appellant did not take concealment or other evasive actions after the incident happened. He also actively cooperated with the investigation of the public security organs. There was no social harm in his sentence. The educational purpose of the criminal law had been achieved. According to the appeal.

Chen told Peng Mei News that after the incident, he and his family had contacted Zhang Moulin many times to apologize and compensate for their willingness, but could not contact, the last time (want to see the door to apologize), the other party called the police. Seeing him in court today (Chang Renyao), he lost a lot of weight. Chang Renyao has paid a great price for this, but justice still needs to be retrieved. Chen told Peng Mei News that in addition to appealing, he would also seek to pursue Zhang Moulins responsibility and report to the relevant departments about his corporal punishment of Chang Renyao.

Chief Justice: Different opinions on the way teachers are educated cannot be used as an excuse for retaliation

What are the considerations for Chang Mous sentencing? On July 10, the presiding judge of the case responded in an interview with the General News and Media Agency of the Peoples Court that Chang Renyao, the accused, had been sentenced to one year and six monthsimprisonment after repeated consideration and careful consideration.

The presiding judge said that, according to the provisions of the Criminal Law, those who engage in provocative acts and disrupt social order shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years, criminal detention or public surveillance. The crime committed by Chang Renyao in this case has caused serious harm to the work and life of the victim, and has a bad impact on the society. It is a bad case and should be punished according to law.

Since Chang Renyao was caught on his way back to Luanchuan to cooperate with the investigation of the public security organs, he confessed the facts of the crime truthfully after the case, surrendered himself and could be given a lighter punishment according to law; Chang Renyao was a first-time offender or occasional offender, and could be given a lighter punishment at his discretion; combined with Chang Renyaos guilty plea attitude in court, he referred to the sixth of the year proposed by the public prosecution organ. Suggestions on sentencing from one month to three years of fixed-term imprisonment, taking into account the fact of Chang Renyaos crime, the nature of the crime, the circumstances of the crime and the degree of harm to society, shall be sentenced to one year and six months of fixed-term imprisonment. Studentsdifferent opinions on the way of teacher education can not be used as an excuse and reason for retaliation over the law. China is a country ruled by law. Laws and regulations stipulate various ways of relief, such as illegal infringement or unfair treatment, which can be solved by various means and through various channels according to law. The chief judge said that Chang Renyaos dissatisfaction with the teachers education methods nearly 20 years ago was the reason for hurting the teacher in this case, which could not be understood and accepted by ordinary people from all the normal working and living conditions after his graduation, as well as from the time interval and the injured objects. To show off and vent his discontent, Chang Renyao should be punished by law for insulting and beating, recording videos and spreading them on the Internet when he encounters a teacher. Source of this article: Peng Mei News Responsible Editor: Xing Haibo_NBJS8850

Since Chang Renyao was caught on his way back to Luanchuan to cooperate with the investigation of the public security organs, he confessed the facts of the crime truthfully after the case, surrendered himself and could be given a lighter punishment according to law; Chang Renyao was a first-time offender or occasional offender, and could be given a lighter punishment at his discretion; combined with Chang Renyaos guilty plea attitude in court, he referred to the sixth of the year proposed by the public prosecution organ. Suggestions on sentencing from one month to three years of fixed-term imprisonment, taking into account the fact of Chang Renyaos crime, the nature of the crime, the circumstances of the crime and the degree of harm to society, shall be sentenced to one year and six months of fixed-term imprisonment.

Studentsdifferent opinions on the way of teacher education can not be used as an excuse and reason for retaliation over the law. China is a country ruled by law. Laws and regulations stipulate various ways of relief, such as illegal infringement or unfair treatment, which can be solved by various means and through various channels according to law. The chief judge said that Chang Renyaos dissatisfaction with the teachers education methods nearly 20 years ago was the reason for hurting the teacher in this case, which could not be understood and accepted by ordinary people from all the normal working and living conditions after his graduation, as well as from the time interval and the injured objects. To show off and vent his discontent, Chang Renyao should be punished by law for insulting and beating, recording videos and spreading them on the Internet when he encounters a teacher.