Twenty years later, the presiding judge of the teachers case: There is no sufficient evidence to prove that the teacher was at fault

category:Society
 Twenty years later, the presiding judge of the teachers case: There is no sufficient evidence to prove that the teacher was at fault


# endText. video-infoa {text-decoration: none; color:#000;}# endText. video-infoa: hover {color:#d747;;} #endText. video-listli {overflow: hidden float: float: left; list-style: none; width: 132px; width: 132px; 118px; position: relative; margin: relative; margin: 8px3px3px0px0px0px0px0px0px0px0px0px;} Text. video-enda video-video-lista decoration: none; col Or::# fff;} # endText. video-list. overlay {text-align: left; padding: 0px6px; background-color:313131; font-size: 12px; width: 12px; width: 120px; position: absolute; bottom: 0px; left: 0px; height: 26px; line-line: 26px; overflow: hidden; color:::# fff;} height } video endt. video-end-list. on {border-8pxxborborborborborborborborborborborborborborxxxxxxxxTexendtext t. video-list. play {width 20px; height: 20px; height: 20px; height: 20px; height: 20px; height: 20px; height: 20px; height: 20px; background: URL (http:///static.ws.126.net/video/img14/zhuzhan/play.png); position: absolute; right: 12px; top: 62px; opacity: 0.7; color:# fff; filter: alpha (opacity = 70); _background: none; _background: none; _filter: progid: DXIDXI Transform. Microsoft Microsoft. Lophar (sImager (sImager= http://///static.static.12tp:///uzhan / Play.png ;;;} endText. video-lista: hover. play {opacity: 1; filter: alpha (opacity = 100);_filter: progid: DXImageTransform. Microsoft. AlphaImageLoader (src=http://static.ws.126.net/video/img14/zhuzhan/zhuzhan/zhuzhan/play.png);} if (1/*///*/(iPhone | Android | EABOBOBOBOBO | NET BlackblackblackBOBO | blackblackblackblackberry | blackblackblackblackberry d+/ ig. test (navigator. userAgent) | |/ saf Ari | chrome | Firefox / I.Test (navigator. userAgent) */{{varstr1 =< video controls =< controls controlspreload = ; varstr2=Your browser is temporarily unable to play this video. ; document.getElementById (FPlayer 1404863609673). parentNode.innerHTML=str1+str2;}Twenty years later hit the teacher casewhy the sentence of one and a half years? Chief Justice: There is no sufficient evidence to prove that the teacher was at fault (source:) window. NTES & & function (d){varf = function (c){varb = C. getAttribute (flash vars), a = C. getAttribute (repovideourl). replace (. flv, mobile. mp4); H = D (c. parentNode. NontNontNode), g = < embedsrc http://v. 163.com/Netswf/video/EasevPlayer. 3.swf flash vars =+b+allowfullscreen = + + + +allowscript access = true allowscript access = always quality = high wmode = opaque quality = opaque width = 100% height = 100% height = 100% type = application/x-shockwave-flash />; if (1/* (1/* (iPhone | iPad | iPod | Android | NETEAEASEBOBOBOBOBO || BlackBerry | bb++++)/ig.test (navigator. Agent *controlspreload= Auto Width= 100% height= 100% >> your browser temporarily cannot play this video. +a+>>>>>>; NTESvideo-inner.video.attr style background:;;;;;$H. $(video[[0]]]innerHTML [[[[[0]]]]]]]]][[[[[0 on), B. addCssuff08 On), a. $((. video-title) [0]]. $(. video-title) [0]]innerHTML = string==typeofb. textContent? B.textContent: b.innerText, a $(. video-title)[0]setAttribute [0]setAttribute (hrefb. getAttribute (url))),$((. video-from$(((.video-from]][0]]]]innerHTML =(source: +source source +b. source AttAttAttAttribute (+++++vara, B = D (d (. video-lis (t.on ) [0] [0] [nextSibling]] [0] [0] [nextSibling]] [0]] [0] [nextSibling]]; ==== B. nodeType & & & & (b = D (b. nextSibling)]; if (b &&d (video-innerinput [0] [0]] [0]]}, function () {{vara ={{init: function ((){{init: function {{{init: function (() {{if (d (video-listli[video-video-listli]] [0]. Caddss (on]]],.EventBind (}, eventnd {: D (. video-listli). addEvent (click, function (b) {e (d (t) His), B. preventDefault ();};}; A. init ();} ();} (NTES);

Why is it sentenced to one and a half years in the case of hitting a teacher after twenty years? Chief Justice: There is no sufficient evidence to prove that the teacher was at fault (Source:)

Maps of the scene of the first instance trial according to Luanchuan County Peoples Court

On July 10, Henan Provinces Teacher Fighting Case After Twenty Years was pronounced publicly by the Peoples Court of Luanchuan County, Henan Province. The court sentenced the defendant Chang Renyao to one year and six monthsimprisonment for the crime of provoking trouble. According to media reports, Chang Renyao said in court that he would appeal after the court sentenced him.

Cover news had previously reported the case. At the end of July 2018, Chang Renyao, 32, slapped his head teacher Zhang Mou in Luanchuan Township Substation, Luanchuan County, Henan Province. His fellow students videotaped him. In December 2018, Chang Renyao was arrested and kept in detention until now.

Guo Jingchao, an attorney for Chang Renyao, said in an interview with the media that Chang Renyao chose to retaliate 20 years later. At the beginning of his second year, he was condemned by Zhang Ming to squat under the platform for dozing in class. During this period, Zhang Ming kicked Chang Renyaos head and body several times.

Cover journalists noted that the official Wechat public number of Henan Provincial High Peoples Court Yufa Sunshine issued an interview with the chief judge of the case. The chief judge of the case said that there was no sufficient evidence to prove that Zhang Moumous education style to Chang Renyao was obviously inappropriate and that the victim could not be found guilty.

The chief judge of the case said that after graduating from junior high school, Chang Renyao had no interaction with his teacher Zhang Mou in the past 20 years. He worked normally. On the day of the incident, he drove to go fishing with his friends. When he met a person who was similar to his teacher 20 years ago, he temporarily stopped and confirmed that his teacher was the one who had insulted and beaten him, and arranged for others to record him. Video beatings are watched repeatedly and spread to others afterwards. Their behavior is arbitrary. Subjectively, it is intentional to cause trouble by reason of venting emotions and playing bravely.

From the point of view of the object of violation, Chang Renyaos behavior not only seriously insulted Zhang Mou-mou, seriously affected Zhang Mou-mou and his familys work and life, but also seriously violated the traditional virtues of respecting teachers and respecting education of the Chinese nation, resulting in bad social impact and undermining social and public order. The court held that Chang Renyao intercepted, abused and beat Zhang Mou-mou at will on the main road of traffic to vent his emotions and exert his power. He also recorded and disseminated video at the same time, which aroused widespread public concern, seriously affected Zhang Mou-mou and his familys work and life, and undermined social morality. Guidelines, public order, good customs and bad circumstances constitute the crime of provoking trouble, which should be punished according to law.

The Chief Justice of the case pointed out that Chang Renyao, the accused, was sentenced to one year and six months of fixed-term imprisonment after repeated consideration and careful consideration. According to the provisions of the Criminal Law, those who engage in provocative acts and disrupt social order shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years, criminal detention or public surveillance.

The crime committed by Chang Renyao in this case has caused serious harm to the work and life of the victim, and has had a bad impact on the society. It is a bad case and should be punished according to law. The Chief Justice said that since Chang Renyao was captured on his way back to Luanchuan to cooperate with the investigation of the public security organs, and confessed the facts of the crime truthfully after the case, he surrendered himself and could be given a lighter punishment according to law; Chang Renyao was a first and occasional offender, he could be given a lighter punishment at his discretion; combined with Chang Renyaos guilty confession attitude in court, he referred to the public prosecution organ. The sentencing suggestion of one year, six months to three years of fixed-term imprisonment is put forward. Considering the fact of Chang Renyaos crime, the nature of the crime, the circumstances of the crime and the degree of harm to society, he is sentenced to one year and six months of fixed-term imprisonment.

Source: Cover News Author: Dai Rui Responsible Editor: Xiao Qi_NN6799