Zhao Yusi, who spent $6.5 million on Stanford University, has a new trend. John Vandemoer, a former sailing coach at Stanford University, was sentenced to one day in court.
On June 12, CBS reported that Van der Moore, deeply involved in the university admissions scandal, had avoided the 13-month prison sentence required by the prosecution.
On the same day, the Boston Federal Court sentenced him to conspiracy fraud and imprisoned him for one day. Since he had spent a day in prison before, Van der Moore walked out of court as a free man after the court sentenced him.
Reported that Van der Moore was sentenced for one day because he did not donate $500,000 to the university through Singer, Zhao Yusis familys principal offender in the case, but spent all of it on the universitys sailing project.
As the first participant to be sentenced in the case, the result of his sentence has attracted the attention of American media.
Van der Moore entered Boston Court on the 12th. Image source: ICphoto
I personally didnt take any money. All the donations went directly to Stanford University and the sailing fleet, Van der Moore said, even asking prosecutors who wanted to imprison him for 13 months. How could this be a bribe?
The American judge who heard the case did not believe that Van der Moores actions constituted bribery.
It is noteworthy that 49 defendants will be awaiting trial in the next case, according to the report. They are parents who pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to get their children into elite schools, and coaches who receive cash and own it.
Felicity-Huffman, the actress, has pleaded guilty among the remaining defendants. Another actor, Lori Loughlin, is still defending the charges.
Steve-Meister, a legal analyst, said: I think anyone waiting for a verdict will tend to see Van der Moores verdict as a benchmark in their favor. And I think it would be wrong.
Van der Moores lawyer said: He has paid a high price, lost his job and reputation. Van der Moore regretted it and apologized to his family.
Unlike other people involved in the case, no one was rejected by Stanford University for coaching behavior. Judges seem to take this seriously.
On the same day, the New York Times published a report entitled Coaches at Stanford who are deeply involved in the admissions scandal to avoid jail. Are universities not blamed? u300b The article questioned whether universities shouldnt take some responsibility for this wrong view and admission culture.
Rick Eckstein, a professor of sociology and Criminology at Villanova University who has written numerous articles on College sports, said that the caring treatment of athletes in admissions at American universities provided a breeding ground for such fraud.
Without such an admission mechanism, these fraudulent practices would never have happened at all, Eckstein said.