The driver threatened to rape a female passenger because he was dissatisfied with the conviction.

category:Internet
 The driver threatened to rape a female passenger because he was dissatisfied with the conviction.


Dissatisfied with the deduction, dripping drivers complained in vulgar language on the platform and threatened to rape female passengers. On April 13, a screenshot of the complaint system triggered the attention of netizens.

Peng Mei News (www.thepaper.cn) learns from the public relations department of Drop Company that the driver launched a complaint in the system on April 11 for his objection to the judgment and made the above remarks after the first complaint failed. In terms of dripping, the platform monitoring system immediately verified with the driver after identifying the driver who threatened to harm others. The driver concerned said that he was angry and promised never to commit any more. In terms of dripping, the following will optimize the detour judgment process and strengthen the safety training and communication for drivers. For the driver himself, the platform has suspended the drivers service qualification.

A driver threatened to rape a female passenger on [email protected] Financial and Economic Map because he was not satisfied with the verdict.

According to webcast screenshots, the driver involved first filed a complaint at 10:39 on April 11, claiming that he did not intentionally take a detour. Every route is guided, and he hoped that the platform would not deduct money. After the first complaint failed, the driver filed a second complaint at 12:16 on the same day, reiterating that he had not detoured and threatening to rape a few more female passengers to make you more famous. Two hours later, the second appeal was passed and the $326.9 deduction was refunded.

On the afternoon of April 13, Peng Mei News contacted the public relations department of Droplet Company, and the relevant person in charge said that Fu Qiang, CEO of Droplet Online Appointment, had responded to this matter in the circle of friends.

Drip side said that after verification, the driver involved in the system launched a complaint on April 11 due to his objection to the judgment. In the first systematic verification of an order dated 10 April, the driver made four yawns and made a detour during the driving process, so the appeal was judged to be unsuccessful.

After that, the driver appealed again and entered the manual examination. The customer service again verified that the order termination point was consistent with the passenger location point, and the difference between the drivers driving mileage and the estimated mileage was less than 1 kilometer. The appeal was passed. Drip side said that the whole process of judgment has nothing to do with whether the driver threatened to hurt people.

In response to the drivers threatened injuries to passengers, drip side said that after the platform monitoring system screened the incident, the safety commissioner immediately checked with the driver. The driver admitted that he had said similar words, but said that he was angry. The safety commissioner has informed the driver that there are problems and can reasonably express his demands, but in this way, this behavior has been suspected of violating the Public Security Administration Penalty Law. u300b Relevant regulations, the driver recognized and promised never to commit again. In response to the question of why the safety commissioner did not immediately stop the drivers service qualifications, drip side said that the safety commissioner did not strictly implement the rules and procedures, the team is conducting in-depth review and accountability. In terms of dripping, the following will optimize the judgment of bypass, and strengthen the safety training and communication for drivers. For the drivers themselves, the platform has suspended their service qualifications, and will arrange for face-to-face communication and safety training with the drivers as soon as possible. While listening to feedback and alleviating negative emotions, the drivers will also fully understand the seriousness of threatening to harm others and sign the guarantee. The platform will judge whether to resume its service qualification according to the situation of communication training. Source: Wang Fengzhi _NT2541

In response to the drivers threatened injuries to passengers, drip side said that after the platform monitoring system screened the incident, the safety commissioner immediately checked with the driver. The driver admitted that he had said similar words, but said that he was angry. The safety commissioner has informed the driver that there are problems and can reasonably express his demands, but in this way, this behavior has been suspected of violating the Public Security Administration Penalty Law. u300b Relevant regulations, the driver recognized and promised never to commit again.

In response to the question of why the safety commissioner did not immediately stop the drivers service qualifications, drip side said that the safety commissioner did not strictly implement the rules and procedures, the team is conducting in-depth review and accountability.

In terms of dripping, the following will optimize the judgment of bypass, and strengthen the safety training and communication for drivers. For the drivers themselves, the platform has suspended their service qualifications, and will arrange for face-to-face communication and safety training with the drivers as soon as possible. While listening to feedback and alleviating negative emotions, the drivers will also fully understand the seriousness of threatening to harm others and sign the guarantee. The platform will judge whether to resume its service qualification according to the situation of communication training.