Gu Xiaojuns voice on the eve of the sentence: I always thought I was innocent

category:Society click:10
 Gu Xiaojuns voice on the eve of the sentence: I always thought I was innocent


According to the Supreme Peoples Court, at 9:30 a.m. on April 10, the First Circuit Court of the Supreme Peoples Court will publicly adjudicate Gu Xiaojun and others to retry the case. The plaintiff was Gu Xiaojun and others. The collegial panel consisted of five members, Pei Xianding, Zhang Yongjian, Luo Zhiyong, Siming Deng and Liu Aitao.

On the evening of April 9, Gu Xiaojun, the former founder of Greencore Group and former chairman of the Board of Directors of Kelon Electrical Appliances, said to the surging journalist, I always think I am innocent, and I believe there will be a good result tomorrow. He made it clear that the perjury, compensation and other issues involved in it would have to wait for the results to come out before thinking, but if convicted, he would appeal.

Gu Xiaojun, 60 years old, invented Greencore Refrigerant in his early years and went into business. Through many acquisitions, he established Greencore Group, which controlled five listed companies such as Cologne Electrical Appliances. In August 2004, the Langgu dispute broke out. Lang Xianping, a scholar, questioned Gu Xiaojuns mergers and acquisitions, saying that Gu Xiaojun had misappropriated a large amount of cash flow from Kelong Electric Appliances to complete various acquisitions and was suspected of violating regulations.

In May 2005, Gu Xiaojun was put on file for investigation. In January 2008, the Intermediate Court of Foshan City, Guangdong Province, handed down the first trial of Gu Xiaojun, the head of the Greencore Department, as a judgment. Gu Xiaojun was sentenced to 12 yearsimprisonment and a fine of 6.8 million yuan for the crime of false reporting of registered capital, illegal disclosure and non-disclosure of important information, and misappropriation of funds.

On September 6, 2012, Gu Xiaojun, released from prison in advance, began to appeal to the Supreme Law.

On December 28, 2017, the Supreme Law announced that two major property rights-related cases involving Zhang Wenjun and Gu Xiaojun were directly brought to trial. Previously, the Supreme Law retrial has been changed to acquit Zhang Wen.

On June 13, 2018, the First Circuit Court of the Supreme Law opened a public hearing in Shenzhen to hear a retrial case of Gu Xiaojun and other falsely reporting registered capital, illegally disclosing or not disclosing important information and misappropriating funds. The trial lasted up to 15 hours on that day.

At that time, Gu Xiaojun, in an interview with the surging news, said, I complained for five years and had no results until December 2017, which is not what my personal strength can achieve.

The Changan Sword of Weixin, the official name of the CPC, once commented on the retrial of Gu Xiaojuns military case: the retrial of Gu Xiaojun was not a process in the name of law, but a milestone to protect property rights in order to take off his cap for Gu Xiaojun. Instead, in the current legal framework, it restored facts to Gu Xiaojun and gave him the entrepreneurs he represented to the customs. Note that the owner of this case has a clear and plain account! ___________

The Supreme Peoples Court Weixin also wrote at that time that the trial fully listened to the opinions of both the prosecution and the defense and the defendant, fully demonstrated the evidence of all parties, and was a vivid practice of trial centralism. No matter how the case is finally decided, the trial mode achieves visible fairness and justice, and is a benchmark to satisfy the publics right to know and enhance judicial credibility.

On April 9, 2019, the night before the Supreme Law sentenced Gu Xiaojun and others to retrial a case, Gu Xiaojun told Peng Mei journalists: Now let me talk about property, compensation or future planning, and I am not in the mood to tell you. In the past, in the future, everything is based on the fact that the case can be reversed, and when the case comes to an end, I will have a good chat with you.

A review of Gu Xiaojuns military case:

In August 2004, the Langgu dispute broke out. Lang Xianping, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, questioned Gus mergers and acquisitions. He said that Gu had misappropriated a large amount of cash flow from Cologne Electric Appliances to complete the acquisitions, and the Lang-Gu dispute was thus launched.

On April 4, 2005, the Securities Regulatory Bureau of Hubei, Jiangsu, Anhui and Guangdong provinces jointly investigated four listed companies of Greencores ST Xiangzhou, Yaxing Bus, Meiling Electrical Appliances and Kelong Electrical Appliances. More than 20 working groups led by the inspection department of the Securities Regulatory Commission formally stationed in Kelong to investigate the suspected embezzlement of Kelong Electrical Appliancesfunds by Greencore.

In May 2005, Gu Xiaojun was put on file for investigation. At the end of July, Gu Xiaojun was taken away by the police at Beijing Capital Airport, and then nine senior Koron and Greencore executives, including Gu Xiaojun, were formally arrested on suspicion of false capital contribution, false financial statements, misappropriation of assets and occupation.

On August 16, 2006, Gu Xiaojun was prosecuted.

On November 7, 2006, Gu Xiaojuns case was heard.

On December 12, 2006, Gu Xiaojuns case was reopened.

On January 30, 2008, the Intermediate Court of Foshan City, Guangdong Province, handed down the first trial of Gu Xiaojun, the head of the Greencore Department, as a verdict. Gu Xiaojun was sentenced to 12 yearsimprisonment and a fine of 6.8 million yuan for the crime of false reporting of registered capital, illegal disclosure and non-disclosure of important information, and misappropriation of funds.

On April 10, 2009, the Guangdong Provincial High Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict in the final judgment of Gu Xiaojun, the former chairman of Kelong Electric Appliances.

On September 6, 2012, Gu Xiaojun, released from prison in advance, began to appeal to the Supreme Law.

On September 14, 2012, Gu held a press conference in Beijing. He sent 27 pages of reports to the media and attached his own press release. There are also CD-ROMs that store documents such as judgments, defence opinions and so on.

On August 17, 2015, Gu Xiaojun held a press conference in Media, Beijing, announcing that he would sue Hisense Cologne and Hisense Group to compensate them for their huge economic losses, totalling 48.961 billion yuan.

In December 2015, Gu Xiaojun formally filed a lawsuit with the First Intermediate Court of Beijing, suing the CSRC for publishing the Kelong case documents. Gu Xiaojun had previously applied to the SFC for the publication of relevant documents for Kelong case filing and investigation, as well as bank guarantees as the key evidence of the case, which were rejected by the SFC.

On December 26, 2017, the Beijing Intermediate Court ruled that the CSRC must announce to Gu Xiaojun the contents of the chairmans Office of the Kelong case. On January 12, 2018, the SFC filed an appeal. On December 28, 2017, the Supreme Law announced that two major property-related cases, Zhang Wenzhis case and Gu Xiaojuns case, were directly brought to trial. On June 13, 2018, the Supreme Court of Justice held a retrial of Gu Xiaojuns case. The prosecution and the prosecution fought fiercely against the crime of misappropriating funds by false reporting of registered capital involved by Gu Xiaojun and others. In the final statement stage, the defense held that three charges should be acquitted, while the prosecution said that two charges should be acquitted; one of the charges should be acquitted; A matter is guilty of accurate characterization, appropriate sentencing. Source: Wang Zheng_N7526

On December 26, 2017, the Beijing Intermediate Court ruled that the CSRC must announce to Gu Xiaojun the contents of the chairmans Office of the Kelong case.

On January 12, 2018, the SFC filed an appeal.

On December 28, 2017, the Supreme Law announced that two major property-related cases, Zhang Wenzhis case and Gu Xiaojuns case, were directly brought to trial.

On June 13, 2018, the Supreme Court of Justice held a retrial of Gu Xiaojuns case. The prosecution and the prosecution fought fiercely against the crime of misappropriating funds by false reporting of registered capital involved by Gu Xiaojun and others. In the final statement stage, the defense held that three charges should be acquitted, while the prosecution said that two charges should be acquitted; one of the charges should be acquitted; A matter is guilty of accurate characterization, appropriate sentencing.