After 1 and a half years imprisonment, the director of land in Henan was sentenced to 19 years for 4 more crimes.

category:Society
 After 1 and a half years imprisonment, the director of land in Henan was sentenced to 19 years for 4 more crimes.


The verdict of the news of the surging News revealed that the 4 crimes discovered by Xu public involved 8 criminal facts, most of which were related to land and housing. After being sentenced to 13 years, he was redeemed to commit 4 crimes. According to a report in 2012 by the peoples network, Taikang County, Henan Province, is the key county for the national poverty alleviation and development work, and the county land and Resources Bureau was a national civilized unit and a red flag of Zhoukou. However, in the three years from 2010 to 2012, the three successive directors of the countys Land Bureau were sacked. The three insurgent news reports, including Xu Gonglis predecessor, Sun Shaohui and Cheng Fucai, deputy director of the Zhoukou Municipal Bureau of land and resources, and Xu Gonglis deputy director. The report mentioned that before the incident, the Internets reflection on Xu publics violation of laws and discipline was constant. Posted on the Internet, Xu Gongli was wounded by four people who were eaten together in a restaurant in Taikang in September 23, 2009. In the post, four of the assailants went to Xu Hanghui for business. Later, not only did they fail to make the business, but Xu Lian did not want to admit it. After simple treatment in Department of orthopedics, Taikang County, Xu was transferred to a hospital in Beijing. He did not dare to call the police from beginning to end. In 2009, in a lecture on the clean government of the land system cadres in the city, Yang Zhengchao, the Secretary of the Zhoukou municipal discipline Commission, said, if some of you are not on the brink of the precipice, it will be a problem next year. The verdict showed that after the investigation of the public, Xu was sentenced to thirteen years in prison for thirteen years in November 11, 2010 and deprived of political rights for three years because of the crime of accepting bribes in November 11, 2010. However, after serving a sentence of one and a half years, in May 10, 2012, Xu public was arrested by the Zhoukou peoples Procuratorate from Henans joffin prison for suspected other crimes. Until 5 years later, the court of Liang Yuan of Shangqiu city made a first instance criminal judgment on Xu case. The court of Liang park found that Xu public constitutes the crime of embezzlement, bribery, abuse of power and fraud. Some of the crimes of corruption and fraud are common crimes. The above four crimes belong to the offense and should be punished for several crimes. Before the incident, all the principal and interest of the loan had been paid off, and Xu public took a lighter punishment. The result of the first trial was as follows: the defendant, Xu public, was sentenced to eleven years in prison, sentenced to eleven years in prison and a fine of RMB 3 million yuan, and deprived of political rights for two years; the crime of accepting bribes was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of three years and six months and a fine of RMB 300 thousand yuan; a crime of abuse of power and a sentence of four years of imprisonment; a crime of fraudulent loans. He was sentenced to three years of imprisonment and a fine of RMB 300 thousand yuan. He was sentenced to thirteen years in prison for the crime of accepting bribes, deprived of political rights for three years, and decided to execute a term of imprisonment for twenty years, deprived of political rights for five years and a fine of RMB 3 million 600 thousand yuan. The illicit money and illegal gains involved should be recovered and turned over to the state treasury. Bribe: ask for a duplex building 250 thousand yuan purchase receipt. The verdict shows that as a land lord, Xu public not only owns many properties in Taikang County, but also houses in Zhengzhou. However, many houses are related to crimes. The first instance court found that in 2006, Xu Gongli, the director of the Taikang county land and Resources Bureau, knew that the Zhoukou Acer home Co., Ltd. had not paid the land leasing money when it was developing the Acer Jiayuan district of Taikang county. When the estate began to be sold in advance, Xu Gongli saw a complex building in the district. In the absence of the purchase of the house, he asked the company manager to sign a purchase contract with Xus wife Jia, and set up a receipt of 250 thousand yuan for the purchase of the house. Cheng Anxu asked Jia to handle the purchase contract and receipts. In April 13, 2010, in the name of Jia Mou, the real estate certificate was handled in Taikang real estate exchange. The fact of the crime was found to be bribed by the court. The court found that in 2008, Xu public and deputy director of the office of Taikang County Land Bureau, Geng, purchased furniture and household appliances for Xu public property in Hongdu garden of Zhengzhou City, with a cost of 61 thousand and 460 yuan. Under the guidance of Xu Gongli, Geng bought the invoice of furniture and household appliances, and made reimbursement on the finance of Taikang County Land Bureau. The facts of the crime are deemed to be embezzled by the court. In 2009, Xu public arranged the chief of the cadastre of the original land bureau, Wei Mou, to handle the land use certificate for the above homestead. The original area of the house was 191.02 square meters. By Xu, Wei, without any formalities, handled 388.36 square meters of state-owned land use certificate in December 8, 2009 for Xu, and improved the relevant cadastre procedures. Xu illegally obtained the right to use the state-owned land of 197.34 square meters. Assessed, the estimated price of 197.34 square meters of land is 147 thousand and 170 yuan. Land lord also engaged in real estate development, once defrauded loan 15 million 500 thousand yuan. The judgment shows that Xu Gongli, director of the Land Bureau, is also developing real estate projects with others. In November 2006, Xu public and others used the name of Xinlong real estate development company of Taikang county (hereinafter referred to as Xinlong company) to develop Taikang County Xinlong Xintiandi real estate project. In December 2006, Xu public and others in the development of the real estate project, in order to raise land transfer funds, counterfeit Wang, Tian a name of the loan application, state land use warrants, investment agreement and other materials, land mortgage guarantee mode, from the Taikang County Rural Credit Association to cheat 15 million 500 thousand yuan. Before the case, the loan principal and interest had been fully repaid. In November 2007, Xu stated that the project was an investment promotion project of the Taikang County Land Bureau, and applied to the county government for the project start-up fee and demolition fee. After signing by the county leaders, Taikang County Finance Bureau allocated 600 thousand yuan to Xinlong company. In February 2008, Xu public also arranged for the government to apply to the county government to support funds. After the county leaders approval, the Taikang County Finance Bureau allocated 280 thousand yuan to Xinlong company. The above two facts were identified by the court as the crime of fraudulent loan and corruption. 20 years of the first trial and 19 years for the second trial After the verdict of the first instance, Xu public appeals did not constitute a crime. Surging news noted that the second instance verdict was a crime committed by Xu court by the court of first instance as a crime of embezzlement, which was considered to be a crime of abuse of power. The verdict showed that in 2007, Xu public, the director of the Taikang County Bureau of land, violated the land management laws and regulations, and will be assessed and carried out 21 sect of state-owned land, with a total area of 14.9457 mu. In the absence of assessment and pending procedures, the staff of the Land Bureau of Taikang county were privately arranged and signed in 2006. A contract for land transfer was made to deliver the state-owned land grant by the benchmark land price in early 2004. After the delivery of the land grant of 3 million 757 thousand and 206 yuan, his son and his relatives were named. The value of the land involved was estimated to be 6 million 436 thousand and 190 yuan in 2007. In the second instance, Xu public and Defense said that the 21 land sold to relatives was not corruption, and the defenders considered it to be abused. The court of second instance adopted the opinion. He believed that Xu public violated the land management law and abused the state land which should be sold through the auction procedure, and paid the state-owned land grant by the benchmark land price in early 2004, causing a huge loss of land grant. As for the transfer of land to anyone without violation, it does not affect the nature. The court believes that the original judgment is clear and the trial procedure is legal, but the application of legal errors leads to improper sentencing and should be corrected. In February 13, 2018, the Shangqiu intermediate peoples court made a decision of two trial, which changed the crime of embezzlement by Xu Gongli from the eleven year of the first trial to five years, and the fine was also changed to RMB 1 million 200 thousand yuan; and the crime of accepting bribes (sentenced to three years and six months, and punishing gold and civil money by 300 thousand yuan) and the crime of abuse of power Four years in prison term), the crime of obtaining a loan (sentenced to three years in prison, a fine of RMB 300 thousand yuan) and the crime of accepting bribes (sentenced to thirteen years in prison for three years), and having been sentenced to nineteen years of imprisonment, deprived of political rights for three years and punishing RMB 1 million 800 thousand yuan. The source of this article: surging news editor: Gu Ying _NN6577 In the second instance, Xu public and Defense said that the 21 land sold to relatives was not corruption, and the defenders considered it to be abused. The court of second instance adopted the opinion. He believed that Xu public violated the land management law and abused the state land which should be sold through the auction procedure, and paid the state-owned land grant by the benchmark land price in early 2004, causing a huge loss of land grant. As for the transfer of land to anyone without violation, it does not affect the nature. The court believes that the original judgment is clear and the trial procedure is legal, but the application of legal errors leads to improper sentencing and should be corrected. In February 13, 2018, the Shangqiu intermediate peoples court made a decision of two trial, which changed the crime of embezzlement by Xu Gongli from the eleven year of the first trial to five years, and the fine was also changed to RMB 1 million 200 thousand yuan; and the crime of accepting bribes (sentenced to three years and six months, and punishing gold and civil money by 300 thousand yuan) and the crime of abuse of power Four years in prison term), the crime of obtaining a loan (sentenced to three years in prison, a fine of RMB 300 thousand yuan) and the crime of accepting bribes (sentenced to thirteen years in prison for three years), and having been sentenced to nineteen years of imprisonment, deprived of political rights for three years and punishing RMB 1 million 800 thousand yuan.