Withdrawal of the Iran nuclear agreement and reaffirming Trumps unique style of governance

category:Hot
 Withdrawal of the Iran nuclear agreement and reaffirming Trumps unique style of governance


Despite opposition from the whole world, US President Trump flagrantly announced that he withdrew from the Iranian nuclear agreement in advance at 2 a.m. Beijing time. The Global Times article, wake up, Trumps withdrawal from Iraq and the world as the enemy truly reflect the consistent position of Chinas mainstream media and experts. In Trumps voice, the U. S. Treasury announced that since now, all businesses and individuals in the United States are not allowed to trade with Iran and sign any new business contracts. There are already business, in different sectors, to give 90-180 days of grace to work after good, and the overdue enforcement of comprehensive sanctions against Iraq The law stipulates. No American company or individual can engage in business dealings with other companies that are blacklisted by the United States in Iran. Trumps announcement that the United States withdrew from the Iraq nuclear agreement was the most deviant decision made by Trump so far. All the mainstream media and experts of China before the same thought that Trump said and never really do it, was also regarded as a foreign policy against the world, including and not limited to: 1, one, and another, and three to sign the presidential executive order, strictly limiting the export of terrorists to the national citizens to visas to the United States. This is considered to be a direct offending of the worlds largest religious team, Muslims, and also let the European Union and other countries like to shout equality of all nations and oppose religious discrimination slogans are deeply disappointed by the state. In fact, Trump only strengthened the visa management of a particular country, and after being overthrown by the judges of the United States federal court, Trump eventually won the judicial lawsuit. Later, on the same grounds, Trump flagrantly withdrew from the Convention on international migration. 2, exit TPP. Trump believes that such multilateral agreements have always allowed backward countries to take advantage of the United States and clean up American manufacturing. This gives the original TPP member states a deep disappointment to the United States. Because the TPP terms clearly exclude China, the TPP abortion began to excel the Chinese mainstream media and experts, but it was quick to find that the new TPP was dominated by the Japanese or not with China, and a few Chinese experts realized that the United States was so ruthless to its allies and was worried about how China would begin. 3, withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement. The reason is that Trump believes that the earths climate is warming without a scientific basis, the policy of forcing the use of clean energy, allowing the United States to pay hundreds of billions of dollars a year for energy costs, and to offer $about 100000000000 to subsidize developing countries that continue to pollute the earth, such as China and India, which greatly weaken the United States. The competitiveness of manufacturing. Trumps move, first let the concept of green and environmental protection of the Western allies and domestic experts jump, but also let China, India, the beneficiary countries are extremely dissatisfied. Fortunately, after the withdrawal of the US, the developed countries such as the European Union and Japan are still struggling. 4, recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and decide to move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Trumps move is equivalent to breaking the political balance in the Middle East and offending all Arabs whose population is far greater than Israels. At the same time, it has placed a very embarrassing position in the vast majority of the world that dare not recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Therefore, the United States policy at the UN General Assembly was met with unprecedented opposition from almost 2/3 countries. Let the US ambassador to the United Nations put a firm word on it: those who oppose the United States will no longer receive US economic assistance. Similarly, the voice of the American representative has just fallen, and some countries talk to the United States on the United Nations General Assembly. The previously agreed economic aid was swept by Trump, not a comprehensive freeze or a substantial reduction. 5, the construction of the border wall of the Mexico. The aim is to prevent a large number of illegal immigrants and drug traffickers in Mexico from entering and leaving the United States at random. The whole world thought Trump was just a joke. He did not expect Trump to really be included in the federal budget, and that if Congress was deleted, the federal government would shut the government and let the American people make a decision, and the congressmen would eventually yield under the great pressure of public opinion. 6, in spite of the Russian military threat, he persisted in retaliation against Syria for the use of chemical weapons to kill civilians. When Russian Putin issued a military threat to the United States in person, he ordered the Russian three troops to enter the state of readiness and threatened to shoot down all the missiles that flew to Syria, but also did not exclude the platform for attacking missiles (American warships and aircraft). Both the Chinese and Russian media alike screamed, and the Third World War was on the verge of fire. Trump disdained to challenge Putin: if you are ready, my missile will come at once. 24 hours later, Trump ordered the US Army to launch a large-scale missile attack against Syria, totally destroying three targets. Why Trump ignored the worlds strong opposition from the close allies of the European Union and walked out of the Iran nuclear agreement. In short, there are two main reasons: first, Trump believed that the Iranian nuclear agreement had only ten years of restriction on Iran, ten years later to bargain, and Iran concealed a large number of nuclear programs. The agreement was fundamentally a useless agreement; second, the agreement did not limit the ability of Iran to develop missiles. With the recovery of Irans economy after the lifting of sanctions, it is a challenge to Russia and Syria to seriously challenge the strategic interests of the United States and its Middle East allies. Therefore, Trump has been demanding that a supplementary agreement be made to repair the two major loopholes in the Iran nuclear agreement. The move was certainly rejected by Iran for granted. After Trump made it clear 5 months ago that if a supplementary agreement could not be negotiated, after the withdrawal of the Iraq agreement, Iran has made hard times to say that once the United States withdraws from Iran, it will resolutely abolish the agreement and reconfirm Irans nuclear policy, making the United States bear terrible consequences. The three traditional allies of Germany, France and Britain have come to work and express their resolute opposition. Looking at Trumps final determination, Irans latest statement is that even if the United States withdrew from the agreement, Iran would remain in the agreement, because Iran had not planned to develop nuclear weapons. Its just like Trumps dishonest decision every time. According to the analysis of the Chinese mainstream media and experts, Trump would certainly fall down if Trump did it alone, but every time Trump made a surprise decision, nothing had happened. The United States withdrew from the Iraq nuclear agreement and resumed comprehensive sanctions on Iran, which had two aspects of responsibility for China: first, China and Russia were the main trading partners of Iran. The move of the United States made the business relations between Chinese enterprises and Iran careful, otherwise the fate of the sudden shock of zxing could be suffered; Two, Trumps intrepid style of style compresses Chinas operating space on the North Korean nuclear issue, and the North Korean nuclear issue may shift towards the most disadvantageous aspect of China - the DPRK either completely succumb to Americas demand to the United States, or the choice of war to be eliminated. It can be said that only two of Trumps running promises are still in the air, one is the nuclear issue, and the other is the balance of trade balance between China and the United States. Others have all been cashed in just over a year after he took office. If Trumps ruling style has a gradual process of shaping and gradually being recognized by people, after Trump withdrew from the Iran agreement, the mainstream media and experts of China, if they have been opinionated, or obsessed, will bring great harm to the relations between China and the United States. For more than a year, I have made a detailed analysis of Trumps style in nearly a hundred articles about Sino US relations and American foreign policy, accurately predicting some of Trumps major policy options, including Trumps flagrant withdrawal from the Iraq nuclear agreement. Next, I briefly sum up Trumps execution style, and make a new forecast for the North Korean nuclear issue and Sino US trade friction. Trumps governing style can be summed up as follows: 2, it is not only political but also powerful. With the mainstream media and experts in China, it is generally believed that Trumps interests and not politics are quite different, or, on the contrary, Trump not only has the strong religious feelings and ideological color of the traditional Republicans. Trumps speech at the United Nations General Assembly last year and the subsequent United States national security strategy report showed that it was very concerned with maintaining the leadership and image of the United States in international affairs, firmly maintaining the free and democratic system, and having a deep pain in the centralization and religious extremism, and then a series of United States against China, Russia, Iran and North Koreas tough foreign policy and practical actions prove that he is not talking about it, but playing the truth. On the one hand, Trump is more efficient, more decisive and more executive than the president of the United States in carrying out his political ideas. On the other hand, if there is a major conflict between politics and the vital interests of the United States in the world, tronp will not hesitate to choose to keep the national interests of the United States and give up his false name. Political image. This is the biggest difference between Trump and the presidents of the United States. 3, policy objectives are clear and goals are not fulfilled. The biggest difference between Trump and the traditional statesman is that he never conceals his own true ideas, always expresses his own policy goals and personal likes and dislikes, and expresses it clearly, in addition to the formal policy speech, to counter the prejudices of the traditional media, to explain his deviant policy and unremittingly in twitter. He defended his policy and clarified his misunderstanding. With regard to the established policy goals and plans of action, no matter how big the resistance is encountered, whether it is an ally persuasion, the cynicism of the mainstream American media, or the tough threat of the enemy or rival, DUS cant shake his established policy goals and action plans. Trump has an enterprisers typical decision - making, high - efficiency and strong style. In order to carry out his own ruling idea, by virtue of the strong strength of the United States and even the feelings of its traditional allies and domestic mainstream media, he disdains the appeasement and compromise of the typical politicians. The enemy or the opponent is more reluctant. This is reflected in Trumps repeatedly challenging Chinas one China principle and ignoring Russias severe warning against Syria. Trumps governing style can be summed up in one sentence: he treats all kinds of traditional politicians disapproval and flickering. Dealing with the Trump administration, if Trump does not have a deep understanding of the above ruling style, but with the successful experience of the past to challenge Trumps bottom line, the light will touch his nose, make himself not a step, and be hit by a swell, a broken head, or even a broken foot and a broken foot, dead and buried. The end of the place. For more than a year, I have been able to basically grasp the direction of the relationship between China and the United States and accurately predict a series of major foreign policy choices in the United States. The reason is that I have a more objective understanding of the political operation of the United States and the personal style of Trump. The style of his acting has a deeper understanding. Based on my understanding of Trumps governing style, I will briefly talk about the possible trend of the North Korean nuclear issue and Sino US trade friction. About the North Korean nuclear issue. The United States has a clear policy goal and action plan. North Korea, because of its flagrant violation of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, must unconditionally show its sincerity. The United States will not bargain with the DPRK until it comes up with an executable permanent, verifiable and irreversible nuclear abandonment plan, and will not give up the limit on the North Korea. If the talks are not good, they will immediately resort to force; the upcoming summit meeting between the US and the DPRK or the summit between the US and South Korea will be the last chance for a peaceful settlement of the Korean nuclear issue. The only uncertainty is whether North Korea will abandon its core in line with the demands of the United States. Because of the well-known but unspeakable reasons, I will further reduce the good degree of the summit between the US and the DPRK from 35% the day before yesterday to 25%. On Sino US trade friction or Sino US trade balance. Saunders, a White House spokesman, announced Monday that Chinese Vice Premier Liu He will visit Washington next week to continue negotiations with the White House on continuing trade disputes; China has confirmed it and is full of expectations. In my opinion, this is an extra negotiation and compromise offered by Trump and the Chinese and American negotiators to avoid a showdown ahead of the North Korean nuclear issue. No matter whether the summit of the US and DPRK can achieve satisfactory results, as long as the US and DPRK summit talks are over, the US side will announce the outcome of the Sino US trade negotiations. Similarly, the US can not stride back from its current position. The key is to see what kind of compromise and concession China will make. All major foreign policies in the United States have more or less impact on China, such as the withdrawal of the Paris climate agreement and the Iran agreement, which have a greater impact on China, and some of the other policies have a smaller impact on China. The great and far-reaching impact on Chinas political, social and economic development is undoubtedly whether the trade friction between China and the United States will evolve into a trade war, which will lead to a comprehensive cold war between China and the United States and even a hot war on the South China Sea and the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. In my opinion, China can only dance with the promise of entering the world to dance with the wolf and gain the greatest benefit from the win-win cooperation and cooperation. If China believes that China has a strong strength to challenge the United States, it will abandon fantasy and prepare for battle. In this case, I wish to share a common hatred with his patriotic fellow countrymen. Looking forward to killing the US in one fell swoop, to be a village secretary or village head in a remote rural area of the United States. The source of this article: History editor Han Jiapeng _NN9841 All major foreign policies in the United States have more or less impact on China, such as the withdrawal of the Paris climate agreement and the Iran agreement, which have a greater impact on China, and some of the other policies have a smaller impact on China. The great and far-reaching impact on Chinas political, social and economic development is undoubtedly whether the trade friction between China and the United States will evolve into a trade war, which will lead to a comprehensive cold war between China and the United States and even a hot war on the South China Sea and the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. In my opinion, China can only dance with the promise of entering the world to dance with the wolf and gain the greatest benefit from the win-win cooperation and cooperation. If China believes that China has a strong strength to challenge the United States, it will abandon fantasy and prepare for battle. In this case, I wish to share a common hatred with his patriotic fellow countrymen. Looking forward to killing the US in one fell swoop, to be a village secretary or village head in a remote rural area of the United States.