Cai Yingwen claimed that Kim Jeong-eun and Wen were called each other president and chairman of the Committee. The leaders of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits should also respect each other, reciprocal negotiations and without any political premise. Between words, the political preconditions of the Xi Ma Hui not far away were erased, but secretly related to the relationship between the state and the state. Where is this no premise? It is clearly the position of Taiwan independence. What is the summit of the Korean and Korean leaders? The two countries have begun talks on improving relations between North and south, easing military tensions, and working together to achieve peace on the Korean Peninsula. The main body of dialogue is two sovereign independent countries. The two Koreas, as members of the United Nations, have been widely recognized by the international community. What is the dialogue between the leaders of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits? As a part of Chinas unity, Taiwan, with the only legal representation of the United Nations, will embody the 92 consensus of the Chinese principle as an arrangement for the premise of dialogue. How can Cai Yingwen not know that the historic meeting between the leaders of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits in November 2015, not long before the arrival of the Taiwan Straits, can not be separated from the important achievements made in the peaceful development of cross-Straits relations since 2008, and the premise that the two sides of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits will take the 92 consensus as a common political basis, and that the two sides have been struggling and accumulated for a long time. Political mutual trust is a matter of time. In the Xi Ma meeting, the practice of addressing each other as Mr. by Xi Jinping and Ma Ying-Jeou is a practical arrangement to fully consider the reality of the two sides of the Straits and reflect mutual respect. Cai Yingwen also expressed his views on the current situation before he shouted the words sitting down to talk. She believes that the recent events in the Asia Pacific region, especially in Taiwan, have many negative interpretations on the mainland, and misjudged, which is a real challenge to the stability of the bilateral relations. While Lai Qingde, the head of the administrative agency, advocated Taiwan independence and declared himself a Taiwan independence worker and Taiwan is a sovereign independent country, Cai Yingwen claimed that Lai Qing de was pragmatic and maintain the status quo. On the other hand, in the cover of maintaining the status quo, one side of the pragmatic Taiwan independence, such a naked double face, does Cai Yingwen misunderstand the judgment of the mainland? In recent years, the mainlands military drills and military aircraft around the Taiwan Straits have conveyed clear and clear information, namely, the determination and ability of the mainland to defeat the separatist act of Taiwan independence and to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state. If the Taiwan independence forces continue to act arbitrariness, the mainland will take further action. The Tsai authorities, who need to bear full responsibility for the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait, and make all the strained confrontation between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, still do not change the essence of hollow in the face of the successive warnings from the mainland, and continue their consistent sit down talk. From before and after the electoral war, this sentence of sincerity and shabby yelling, often used by the Tsai authorities to pretense and prevarication, can only show the awkward ugliness of the lack of dialogue channels and the solution of all problems in the mainland. It is noteworthy that in April 27th, when the Korea and South Korea signed the Panmunjom declaration, it was the 25th anniversary talks between the two sides. It is said that during the Ma Ying-Jeou administration, South Korea sent people to Taiwan to learn from the experience of cross-strait exchanges and peace talks. For a while, the cross-strait relations, which were admirable for the DPRK and South Korea, are now corrupted by Cai authorities. Cai Yingwen spoke of the Korean model. Why not say the heavy head, learn the experience of developing cross-Straits relations for the Korean effect law, look back on the interaction between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, the 92 consensus cannot be used, the 92 consensus will be dangerous, the golden key to the peaceful development of the cross-straits relations and the good faith between the two sides of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits. All the touchstones are in the world.