Jilin version of uncles nephew will be retrial five major problems after 20 years did not find out.

category:Global
 Jilin version of uncles nephew will be retrial five major problems after 20 years did not find out.


The retrial decision of the high Academy of Jilin In May 9th, the Beijing Youth Daily reporter learned that the Jilin provincial high court decided to start a retrial procedure for a murder case 23 years ago. The case was born in 1995, also known as the Jin Zhehong case. In 1995, a 20 year old maiden in Yongji County, Jilin province was killed, and Jin Zhehong, 27, was locked as a suspect in murder. Jin Zhehong was sentenced to death and sentenced to prison for 4 times. In the case of hearing and serving the sentence, the case was revealed by the media in July 2014. The case was similar to the case of Zhang Gaoping in Zhejiang, which was called the Jilin edition of nephew case. Retrial: the evidence is not true and insufficient Jin Zhe, a long - term attorney for Jin Zhes macro case, introduced his lawyer Xi Xiangdong. In the afternoon of May 9th, he met Jin Zhe Hong in the Changchun prison and confirmed that the Jilin provincial high academy had sent Jin Zhehong to Jin Zhehong for retrial decision on 8 May. Jilin Provincial High Court made the retrial decision in March 26, 2018, which corrected Jin Zhehongs name to Kim zhe Hong. From the 1995 incident to the third trial of the second instance in 2000, the trial lasted for 5 years. In November 9, 1996, August 4, 1998 and May 29, 2000, the intermediate peoples Court of Jilin, Jilin Province, found that the defendant, Jin zhe Hong, was guilty of intentional homicide, and sentenced to death for two years and deprived of political rights for life. During that time, Jin zhe Hong had appealed three times, and the Jilin provincial high court returned the case to the middle court for retrial two times. Finally, in August 23, 2000, the court made a ruling to dismiss the appeal and maintain the first trial. During his stay, Kim zhe Hong continued to cry out. The Jilin provincial high court dismissed its appeal in March 26, 2012. But Jin Zhehong did not accept and complained in prison. The retrial decision of the high court of Jilin province said that in March 2018, the hospital was reexamined and considered that the evidence of the original entry into force and the conviction and sentencing of the evidence were not true and inadequate. According to the provisions of the first and 245th articles of the 243rd article of the Criminal Procedure Law of Peoples Republic of China, the institute decided to make a separate joint proposal by the Institute. The court shall carry out the retrial, and the retrial period shall not stop the execution of the original judgment. As early as in July 2014, the Jin zhe Hong case was disclosed by the media, and the Jilin provincial high academy responded at that time: a special person has been organized to investigate and understand the situation carefully and will be handled according to the law in time. The Beijing Youth Daily also reported the murder suspect in 2016. Jin Zhehong was sentenced to death 4 times When the case happened in 1995, Jin zhe Hong was 27 years old. He had married his wife and had children. According to the dossier, a female corpse was found in xinliotun north of Shuanghe Town, Yongji County in September 29, 1995. In October 11th, Kim zhe Hong was taken over by the police and was locked up as a suspect. After the police closed the case, prosecutors filed a public prosecution. About the process of murder, the first instance of the first instance of the indictment described: in September 10, 1995, 17 when Xu, Kim sent to rented his motorcycle female young Li to Shuanghe Town, on the way to Li Qi, he wanted to have a sexual relationship with Li, and then with a motorcycle to take Li to the Xinlitun North Shen Ji railway in Shuanghe Town, and Li have sexual relations with Li, when Li When he asked gold for money, he was refused by gold, and Li was threatening to go to the public security organs. He was afraid of things. He pressed Li to the ground, pinched his neck with his hands, and made it faint. Jin thought Li was dead, and Li was buried in a grove in a bush grove near the subgrade of the south side of the railway, and then fled the scene. Forensic identification: the victim Li is the right front of the forehead affected by external force, neck caused by strangulation in the coma, was buried in the body with mud, inhaling a large amount of sediment, blocking the trachea, bronchus, accompanied by foreign body stimulation, causing the trachea strong spasm contraction cause asphyxiation and death. In the first session, Kim zhe Hong confession in court denied killing. Jin Zhehong said: because the price was not discussed, Lee did not take his car, and there was no murder. He did not know the name of the girl. More than half a month later, the womans corpse was found. The police explored the scene, surrounded by many people. He was also there, but did not see the face of the deceased. After being arrested for questioning, he realized that the victim was a girl who had spoken to him. For the first time, the Jilin intermediate peoples court found Kim zhe Hong guilty of intentional homicide and sentenced him to a reprieve. Jin Zhehong appealed. In 1997, the first second instance of the case, the Jilin provincial high court sent the case back to the central court for retrial. The result of the second first instance of the Jilin intermediate peoples court was still suspended. The provincial high court again sent the case back to retrial. In the third instance, the decision of the Jilin intermediate peoples court was still suspended. The Jilin Provincial High Court did not send the retrial again, but maintained the sentence of reprieve. It is called the Jilin edition of nephew case In December 1997, when the Jilin provincial high court returned the case of Jin zhe Hong to the Jilin Municipal Intermediate Peoples court for the first time, it sent a letter to the Central Peoples court to find out five major problems: What is the motive of the case? Two, where is the first scene of the case? Three, can you determine the specific date (time) of the death of the victim? Four, the forensic identification of the public security organs in the volume, the full extent of the stomach, the analysis of the content of the stomach contents, and the victim Li after the last meal of half an hour after the last meal to one hour after the meal. Death, the victims last meal, where to eat, what to eat and after the meal to the victims action process to make clear. Five, should we further determine whether the defendant has the time of committing a crime? In addition, semen and semen stains were not detected in autopsy. Jin Zhehongs defense lawyer said: there is no semen and speckles, which proves that the evidence of sexual behavior between Jin zhe Hong and Li is very weak; there is no sexual relationship, and the courts motive for committing a crime does not exist. Forensic identification analysis also said that Lees right forehead subcutaneous hematoma is a blunt external force. The first two trial found that when Kim zhe Hong was committing a crime, he used a wooden stick to hit Lees head, knocked Li down to the ground, and then pinched his neck with his hands. However, police did not find any blunt instruments such as wooden sticks at the scene of the investigation. In the third trial, the wooden stick disappeared and became the mouth pressed by Lee on the left leg, and he stuck his neck in his hands. In the subsequent proceedings, prosecutors did not submit new evidence, and the above contradictions and doubts did not come to a reasonable explanation. There are many similar plots in the Jin zhe Hong case and Zhang Gaopings nephew case: the girl hitchhiking is killed; the driver is accused of having sex with and killing; the victim has not left semen in the human body; there is no witness on the crime scene; the murderer does not leave the fingerprints, hair and footprints; the convicted evidence is the defendants confession, only the material provided by the prison investigation; The accused was subjected to torture by torture. It is worth noting that in the process of investigating the two cases, there are prison detection and detective. What is different is that in the case of Zhejiangs uncles nephew, the injured girl did take the car of his nephew, and in this case, Kim said the price did not talk about the girl at last and did not get a ride. In addition, the murderer of his nephew did not leave fingerprints, hair and footprints, but in the victim Wangs fingernail, the DNA was extracted. The police found that the DNA was in good agreement with the perpetrators of the death penalty in 2005. And the lawyer zhe Hong case files that the lawyer has at present, has not shown that the DNA substance of the suspect has been found at the scene of Lees murder. The illness of Jin Zhehong is entangled Li Jinxing, a long - term attorney for the case, said that in the process of investigating the case, the case handling personnel had serious torture to extort a confession from the innocent Jin zhe Hong. In 2000, the Yongji County Procuratorate made a forensic identification to Jin zhe Hong. The conclusion was that the three scar lines of the anterior chest were caused by trauma, and the wrist pain was associated with trauma. Lawyer Xi Xiangdong said that Jin Zhehong now suffers from diabetes, kidney stones, stomach disease, lower limb weakness, heart disease and many other diseases. At present, he is walking on a double crutch. After receiving the retrial decision in May 8th, Kim zhe hung wailed and slept all night. (9) when he met, he was concerned about when to hold a court session and whether he could pronouncement the sentence in court. He felt that his illness was so numerous that his physical endurance had reached the limit. He was afraid to drag it too long to wait until the day of sentencing. Xi Xiangdong said that he had submitted the defense procedure to the Jilin Provincial High Court and suggested that the court should hear the case as soon as possible. Source: Beiqing net Beijing Youth Daily Author: Li Xianfeng editor in charge: Xu Meng _NN7485