Judge of the United States of California concluded that coffee must have cancer warning.

category:Hot
 Judge of the United States of California concluded that coffee must have cancer warning.


Early this year, a ruling on coffee made it one of those who drank coffee, according to The Associated Press. The ruling was final on Monday. The judge of Losangeles decided that coffee sold in California must have a cancer warning. Elihu Belle (ElihuBerle), a judge in the Losangeles high court, said that Starbucks (StarbucksCorp) and other companies or retailers were unable to prove that the advantage of drinking coffee was greater than the risk of producing carcinogens in the roasting. In fact, he tried to make the same written ruling in March. A non - profit organization has prosecuted about 90 companies, including KeurigGreenMountainInc. and Peet sOperatingCo.Inc., according to state legislation, because they did not comply with the legal requirements to attach a carcinogenic warning to potentially carcinogenic products. Coffee manufacturers did not deny that coffee contains acrylamide as a carcinogen. But they claim that the substance is in a harmless standard and that to make coffee have an essential taste, it will inevitably produce such a substance, so the law should revoke the restrictions on its products. The final judgement has removed obstacles for the Education Commission and the study of toxic substances to seek a long-term mandatory measure. This coercive measure means either putting a warning label on the coffee or letting the manufacturer remove the chemicals in the coffee product - the same as the potato makers who were prosecuted a few years ago. Rafael Mezger, the Deputy lawyer for the nonprofit organization, said he hoped that after a discussion, the eight - year - long case of fermenting could be solved. I have been a lawyer for many years and never met such a kind of memetz said. They have lost confidence and we are determined to win. What we need to consider today is the nature and form of coercive measures and how to evaluate punishment. Coffee makers say they are facing many choices, including appeals. They believe that carcinogenic warnings are misleading, and a large number of studies have proved the benefits of coffee drinking. However, at present, manufacturers and their lawyers have not responded to their comments on the decision. Source: cover news editor: Han Jiapeng _NN9841 The final judgement has removed obstacles for the Education Commission and the study of toxic substances to seek a long-term mandatory measure. This coercive measure means either putting a warning label on the coffee or letting the manufacturer remove the chemicals in the coffee product - the same as the potato makers who were prosecuted a few years ago. Rafael Mezger, the Deputy lawyer for the nonprofit organization, said he hoped that after a discussion, the eight - year - long case of fermenting could be solved. I have been a lawyer for many years and never met such a kind of memetz said. They have lost confidence and we are determined to win. What we need to consider today is the nature and form of coercive measures and how to evaluate punishment. Coffee makers say they are facing many choices, including appeals. They believe that carcinogenic warnings are misleading, and a large number of studies have proved the benefits of coffee drinking. However, at present, manufacturers and their lawyers have not responded to their comments on the decision.