British media: Trump put forward irrational demands for China to fight for trade war.

category:Hot
 British media: Trump put forward irrational demands for China to fight for trade war.


A screenshot of the Financial Times website The article said that if the Trump administration was just trying to find an excuse to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, it would be more justifiable in China. But China has shown that retaliation is its strength. Contrary to Trumps assertion that trade wars are easy to win, he may lose the trade war and lose politically and economically. Trump has an insoluble knot: bilateral trade deficit is a sign of economic weakness. Along this way, he doubled the amount of Chinas annual trade surplus to cut the US trade surplus, from $100 billion to $200 billion, more than half of the total surplus. He never seemed to think that exports to the US could only shift to other countries, making the overall deficit in the US unchanged. The Trump administration also continued to launch an attack on the rule-based multilateral trading system, requiring China to give up complaints against the United States in the World Trade Organization (WTO), the article said. In addition, the United States also requires China to stop anti-dumping or countervailing duties on products imported from the United States, whether or not it is in line with the WTO rules. The United States requires China to unilaterally cut tariffs on all non sensitive goods to the US, remove non - tariff barriers that the US view is unfair, and open the FDI market to the United States, while allowing Washington to stop Chinas direct investment in the US by national security. Capital. Russian satellite network In response, Beijing asked Washington to abandon Chinas list of non - market economies, a label that makes it easier for the United States to levy anti-dumping duties on China. On this issue, China has a good reason to prove that the United States has violated its commitments; the case is currently under WTO litigation. The article said Trump had to be careful. Beijing has all kinds of tools that can be used to strike Trumps political heartland. The article argues that these proposals can not even serve as a sensible basis for negotiations. China should reject them. If the United States wants China to reduce its intervention measures, it must be targeted, concrete and respect international law. This series of demands is nothing more than a destructive provocation. This article source: Reference News Net editor: Zhao Yaping _NN9005 In response, Beijing asked Washington to abandon Chinas list of non - market economies, a label that makes it easier for the United States to levy anti-dumping duties on China. On this issue, China has a good reason to prove that the United States has violated its commitments; the case is currently under WTO litigation. The article said Trump had to be careful. Beijing has all kinds of tools that can be used to strike Trumps political heartland. The article argues that these proposals can not even serve as a sensible basis for negotiations. China should reject them. If the United States wants China to reduce its intervention measures, it must be targeted, concrete and respect international law. This series of demands is nothing more than a destructive provocation.