The US Department of defense is accused of insufficient Chinese ability, and the Congress asks the defense chief to try to improve it.

category:Hot
 The US Department of defense is accused of insufficient Chinese ability, and the Congress asks the defense chief to try to improve it.


Data map (The Associated Press) Overseas network May 8, the United States House of Representatives armed forces Committee launched a proposal that the United States Defense Minister needs to formulate plans to make up for the shortcomings of the US Department of defense in Chinese, Korean and Russian. According to TASS 8 reported that, in accordance with the US fiscal year 2019 defense authorization act, the armed forces Committee of the house of Representatives launched a proposal. The proposal includes: the Minister of defense should provide a plan to solve the lack of professional knowledge of the whole US Department of defense in Chinese, Korean and Russian. Specifically, the plan should cover short term plans and long-term plans, and build corresponding capabilities in the 51 key areas for the Department of defense. According to the proposal, the Secretary of defense should submit a plan to the National Defense Commission within 180 days after the passage of the bill. The committee should consider the plan within a week and then vote in the house of Representatives. After the adoption of the house of Representatives, the relevant documents will be referred to the Senate. In January 19th, the United States Department of Defense announced a new version of the national defense strategy report, which called China and Russia as a modifier and challenger to the international order dominated by the United States and its allies. The opening of the outline points out that strategic competition between countries, rather than counter-terrorism, will be the primary concern of US national security at this stage. The United States media compares the summary of the national defense strategy report and the previous difference, and believes that the biggest change is reflected in the transfer of the core concern from counter-terrorism to the strategic competition between the States. From the Obama era, the wording of maintaining and Sino Russian strategic stability has changed to regard China and Russia as competitors. The Assistant Secretary for defense, Colby, pointed out before the summary that the report was not a strategy for confrontation, but to recognize reality to strengthen its own strategy. The report of the Ministry of defense, the spokesman of the Ministry of national defense, responded that the US Defense Ministry announced the summary of the 2018 US national defense strategy report in January 19th. The so-called competition of the so-called great powers and the Chinese military threat are full of zero sum game, antagonism and other unrealistic arguments. It is a very strong report of the cold war after the national security strategy report of the United States. The Ministry of defense stressed that the historical wheels of civilization and progress are rolling forward, and the trend of peaceful development is huge. We urge the US side to abandon the cold war thinking, comply with the theme of the times of peaceful development and the world situation, rationally and objectively view Chinas national defense and military construction, earnestly implement the important consensus of the two heads of state with the Chinese side, and add more to the relations between the two countries and strive to make the relations between the two armies a stable factor in Sino US relations. (overseas net Jiang Shuyi) this article source: Overseas net responsibility editor: Zhao Yaping _NN9005 The report of the Ministry of defense, the spokesman of the Ministry of national defense, responded that the US Defense Ministry announced the summary of the 2018 US national defense strategy report in January 19th. The so-called competition of the so-called great powers and the Chinese military threat are full of zero sum game, antagonism and other unrealistic arguments. It is a very strong report of the cold war after the national security strategy report of the United States.