Court first trial private schools were demolished case, the county government into a defendant

category:Global
 Court first trial private schools were demolished case, the county government into a defendant


In May 7th, the subpoena information obtained by the upstream journalists showed that, at 9 a.m. 8, the intermediate peoples Court of Zhoukou, Henan Province, would hear the legal case of the Luyi County Peoples Government of the peoples Government of Luyi to dismantle Li Yafangs kindergarten. This is the first time that a local court has heard the case of forced demolition of private schools in Zhoukou. More than one Li Yafang family was forced to demolished. From August 2017 to January 2018, more than 40 private schools in Huaiyang county and Luyi County in Zhoukou were demolished by the government. After the demolitions, 5 school legal persons submitted administrative litigation to the court respectively. In April 3rd of this year, Li Yafang wrote to the intermediate peoples Court of Zhoukou the administrative prosecution of the defendant in a column: the peoples Government of Luyi County, the legal representative Li Gang, and the head of the county. Li Yafangs claim is: request to revoke the defendants demolitions in December 31, 2017 (2017) 015 administrative compulsory demolition notice. The Zhoukou Municipal Intermediate Peoples Court issued a summons to Li Yafang. Notice No. 15 said that Li Yafang unauthorized permission to test the cultural road construction kindergarten in Luyi County violated a number of legal provisions. You will be dismantled in 3 days and will be dismantled in accordance with the law. The reason for Li Yafangs explanation is that in January 3, 2018 she found the demolition notice on the pillars of the school gate. The announcement is to reissue the document. The defendant has already dismantled her house in December 18, 2017 and December 28th. According to Article thirty-third to forty-fourth of the fourth chapter of the administrative coercive law of Peoples Republic of China, the administrative organs should warn the parties to perform their obligations beforehand before the administrative enforcement decision is made. When a written form is made in written form, the party has the right to make a statement and plea after the receipt of the notice, and the administrative organ may make a decision on the enforcement of the decision when it is urged that the parties do not perform the administrative decision and have no justifiable reasons. The defendant made a notice directly to the plaintiff without performing any preposition procedure, which obviously violated the legal procedure. Source of this article: upstream news responsibility editor: Zhang Xianchao _NN9310 Notice No. 15 said that Li Yafang unauthorized permission to test the cultural road construction kindergarten in Luyi County violated a number of legal provisions. You will be dismantled in 3 days and will be dismantled in accordance with the law. The reason for Li Yafangs explanation is that in January 3, 2018 she found the demolition notice on the pillars of the school gate. The announcement is to reissue the document. The defendant has already dismantled her house in December 18, 2017 and December 28th. According to Article thirty-third to forty-fourth of the fourth chapter of the administrative coercive law of Peoples Republic of China, the administrative organs should warn the parties to perform their obligations beforehand before the administrative enforcement decision is made. When a written form is made in written form, the party has the right to make a statement and plea after the receipt of the notice, and the administrative organ may make a decision on the enforcement of the decision when it is urged that the parties do not perform the administrative decision and have no justifiable reasons. The defendant made a notice directly to the plaintiff without performing any preposition procedure, which obviously violated the legal procedure.