Husband and wife divorce court decision after a couple divorces and buys a school district house.

category:Global
 Husband and wife divorce court decision after a couple divorces and buys a school district house.


Recently, the peoples Court of Baoshan District, Shanghai (hereinafter referred to as Baoshan District court) tried this case, and decided that the agreement on property in the agreement on the property of the divorce was invalid, and the judgment was re divided into the common property. The news reporter learned from the court that in October 2011, Ms. Chen and Mr. Chen ended their long-distance running in love and entered marriage. In August 2015, Ms. Chen gave birth to a pair of twins. In order to allow children to receive better education, the two couples discuss the purchase of a school district room. As a result of love, Ms. Chen has a set of real estate, and before marriage, Mr. Chen bought a set of marriage rooms in the name of Mr. Chen. According to the policy, both the couple then buy the tax and loan interest rates of the school district. In order to save the money, the two people decided false divorce to avoid the policy and agreed to go to the Civil Affairs Bureau to deal with the procedure of divorce, and then by Ms. Chen, she sold his own property, and then bought the school district with Ms. Chens personal name, and then remarried after buying the school room. In August 2016, Ms. Chen and Mr. Chen signed the divorce agreement and registered the divorce registration. The agreement on the property part of the divorce agreement was that the common property after marriage was divided. After the divorce registration, Ms. Chen sold her premarital housing and bought a school district housing in her own name. After everything was completed, Ms. Chen proposed a request for remarriage, but was rejected by Mr. Chen. After many times looking for ex husband to remarry without fruit, Ms. Chen prosecuted the ex husband to the court, demanding to divide the registration room under the name of Chens marriage room and the car purchased after marriage. In the trial, Ms. Chen believes that the real estate purchased by Mr. Chen in his own name before marriage is actually a marriage room, the first payment and the marriage loan are all shared by two people, and the house has not been registered after marriage, the house and the parking space belong to the common property of the husband and wife, because the two parties are divorced, so it should be re divided. After the trial of the Baoshan District court, it is believed that, according to the WeChat chat records, the common travel travel list and the common living conditions of the two parties after the divorce registration, the two party can confirm that the two parties are dealing with the false divorce registration for the avoidance of the policy. The court holds that the agreement on the division of property in the divorce agreement is produced by the false acts of both parties, not for the real meaning of the actual divorce, so the agreement on the property part is invalid. Although the two parties do divorce registration out of other motives, the date of marriage has been released from the date of registration and divorce, the foundation of the house has been lost, and Ms. Chen has asked for a new division to comply with the law. Considering the value of the housing and parking space, the loan, the value added part, the contribution of Ms. Chen and Mr. Chen, and the care of the womens rights and interests in the divorce cases, the house and the parking space are decided by Mr. Chen, the remaining loans are paid by Mr. Chen, and Mr. Chen pays 950000 yuan for the discount of Ms. Chens property. The source of this article: surging news editor: Wang Zheng _NN7526 After the trial of the Baoshan District court, it is believed that, according to the WeChat chat records, the common travel travel list and the common living conditions of the two parties after the divorce registration, the two party can confirm that the two parties are dealing with the false divorce registration for the avoidance of the policy. The court holds that the agreement on the division of property in the divorce agreement is produced by the false acts of both parties, not for the real meaning of the actual divorce, so the agreement on the property part is invalid. Although the two parties do divorce registration out of other motives, the date of marriage has been released from the date of registration and divorce, the foundation of the house has been lost, and Ms. Chen has asked for a new division to comply with the law. Considering the value of the housing and parking space, the loan, the value added part, the contribution of Ms. Chen and Mr. Chen, and the care of the womens rights and interests in the divorce cases, the house and the parking space are decided by Mr. Chen, the remaining loans are paid by Mr. Chen, and Mr. Chen pays 950000 yuan for the discount of Ms. Chens property.