The ball shirt sponsors a big or?

category:Sports
 The ball shirt sponsors a big or?


From a purely mathematical point of view, Nikes 10 - year and 3 billion - year list looks like a huge number, but if it is with other clubs and the sponsorship of the business association, you might not see it: Adidas has paid a price of 10 years and 750 million pounds from Nikes hand to Manchester United shirt sponsorship. The annual sponsorship amount is 75 million pounds, while the city team can get 1 years sponsorship from Puma for 45 million years. If you think the big clubs are much more influential than any one, then South ampton, Sang Delan, West Hamlet, and even Everton are four, five million - pound shirt sponsors, equivalent to 43 million yuan a year. This is only a year and one team of the contract amount, contrast, Nike 80 million RMB a year in cash and 16 teams, each team is less than 5 million RMB, it is a little too little. When Nike was first introduced to China, it played a positive role in the re establishment of China super brand. But where the truth of business is said to be in the past, even if the first ten years of the contract has made some people feel a bit of a loss, all the teams in China and super are already unconditionally actively cooperating with the Chinese super company, and the influence of the Chinese super company is not the same as that of ten years ago, let alone the operation of the club. This has increased by more than 10 times compared with ten years ago. Under such circumstances, the sponsorship contract is still in place, and it is hard to please. Some will say that Kita Kamihiros consumption capacity and the other two or three line cities have a gap, if the free investment will be liberalized, it will cause the stronger cycle, such a statement, the same can not stand. Looking at the worlds football world, every country has its own big team and the civilian team. There are 7 or 8 teams in London at the most, but can you force Chelsea Arsenal to take the same business sponsorship with Crystal Palace? Bayern Munich and Hoffenheim are all in the Bundesliga. Should they be cut across the board on commercial sponsorship? There is no mistake in protecting small and medium-sized clubs by the football association and the China super company, but it is absolutely undesirable to set up all this on the premise of sacrificing the interests of the big clubs. After all, coordinated development is not equalitarianism, nor is it a simple and crude one. Source: NetEase sports writer: Shang Xiang editor: Xu Song _NS1943 Some will say that Kita Kamihiros consumption capacity and the other two or three line cities have a gap, if the free investment will be liberalized, it will cause the stronger cycle, such a statement, the same can not stand. Looking at the worlds football world, every country has its own big team and the civilian team. There are 7 or 8 teams in London at the most, but can you force Chelsea Arsenal to take the same business sponsorship with Crystal Palace? Bayern Munich and Hoffenheim are all in the Bundesliga. Should they be cut across the board on commercial sponsorship? There is no mistake in protecting small and medium-sized clubs by the football association and the China super company, but it is absolutely undesirable to set up all this on the premise of sacrificing the interests of the big clubs. After all, coordinated development is not equalitarianism, nor is it a simple and crude one.