7 days ago, 7 days ago, Ho Fen threw himself in the lake. As a result of a criminal case, in 4 years, the case was tried by the third level court of the lake north, he had been convicted of a convicted sentence, but the Hubei High Court held that the result was not stipulated in the law. He and his co - defendant Peng Hua Gang should not be sentencing below the legal sentence and returned to retrial in November 1, 2017. In May 4th, the head of the news agency of the Wuhan middle court told the news that the case of Peng Huagang and He Fen was still not declared, which was under trial and was scheduled to be sentenced next week. One year of the original trial, the second instance was sent back to the central court In February 21, 2014, he was detained in criminal custody in criminal detention, arrested in March 10th of the same year, and was pending for trial in February 9, 2015. The case lasted for 4 years. It was tried by the third court of Hubei, and it was remanded for the two time and the 5 session. According to the ruling of the Hubei High Court and the judgement of the Wuhan intermediate peoples court, he Fen served as the director of the office of the economic and Information Bureau of Huangpi District, Wuhan. In October 23, 2014, the peoples Procuratorate of the Huangpi District brought a public prosecution to the district court, accusing he of the crime of abuse of power, bribery, and the crime of accepting bribes by the unit, and the former director of the business promotion office of the Wuhan economic and Information Committee, Peng Huagang, accused of abusing the crime of abuse of power and bribery; the crime of accepting bribes by the Huangpi District Commission for control Wuhan Huabao weaving and dyeing Co., Ltd. was charged with the crime of taking bribes by the controlled offenders, and three people (the legal representative, the supervisor and the production manager of Huabao company) were charged with the crime of fraud and the crime of bribery by the unit. Among them, the fact that he was accused was three. 2. During the post of the General Co chief of the Huangpi District, the defendant, Ho Fen, took advantage of the duty convenience for the state phase out of the state elimination of backwardness capacity reward funds, for the benefit of others and 24 thousand and 500 yuan for the bribery of others. In 3 and December 2013, the Huangpi District Commission of the defendant made use of the office to facilitate the construction of subsidies and subsidized subsidies for the power line of the industrial park and to allocate the above subsidy for 400 thousand yuan for the Wuhan Mulan North Group Limited company. In January 2014, the Huangpi District Commission of the defendant, after a collective study, decided to report some of the cost of the unit to a company in Wuhan. The defendant, Ho Fen, was contacted by Chen Moujia, the deputy general manager of a certain company in Wuhan, and the director of the office. The defendant was sent to the company by the Bureau of the Huangpi District of Huangpi. RMB 200 thousand yuan. In the court, he Fen did not consider himself a crime. All three offences were pleaded without guilt. In May 22, 2015, the Huangpi District Court made a trial decision: he was found guilty of dereliction of duty and sentenced to six months in prison. He was sentenced to one year of imprisonment, a year of imprisonment, a year of imprisonment, 1600 yuan of illegal income, and the state treasury in accordance with the law; the crime of accepting bribes was not identified. Among the defendants and defendants, Peng Huagang was convicted of negligence and was sentenced to one year in prison. He was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for the crime of accepting bribes. He decided to carry out a ten year sentence of fixed-term imprisonment for 161500 yuan in accordance with the law and turn over the state treasury in accordance with the law; the Huangpi District Commission was not guilty; the crime of bribery of Hua Bao weaving and dyeing company was sentenced to a crime of bribery, and the crime of bribery of Hua Bao weaving and dyeing company. The fine was one hundred thousand yuan, and the defendant, Luo pin, Luo Li and Luo Xue, were all guilty of bribery. They were sentenced to two years imprisonment or six months a year. After the sentencing, the Huangpi District procuratorate refused to accept the protest, and all defendants and Warburg textile dyeing company refused to accept the appeal. In November 26, 2015, the Wuhan intermediate peoples court revoked the original judgment on the grounds of unclear facts and insufficient evidence and sent it back to Huangpi District Court for retrial. Two the punishment of the convicted crime and the retrial of the high court back to the middle court According to relevant referee documents, in June 27, 2016, the peoples Court of Huangpi district made a new trial decision. In the case of the crime of abuse of power, the defendant, Peng Huagang, was sentenced to six months imprisonment for the original trial, and the defendant, Ho Fen, was exempt from criminal punishment. In the judgment, he Fen was picked to take bribes, and the crime of dereliction of duty was found to be a crime of abuse of authority. In March 12, 2017, the Wuhan middle court heard that the Huangpi court was improperly sentencing the crime of abusing Peng Huagang and ho Fens powers under the legal punishment, but in view of the principle of not adding punishment to the appeal, the court decided to maintain the conviction and sentencing part of the crime of abuse of power by Peng Huagang and He Fenfan by the first trial. In the judgment, the court found Peng Huagang guilty of bribery and abuse of power. He was sentenced to eleven months imprisonment and a fine of one hundred thousand yuan. Warburg dyeing and dyeing company, Luo pin, Luo Li and Luo Xue were acquitted. The judgment was submitted to the Supreme Peoples court according to law. The judgment of the Wuhan intermediate peoples court was stopped in the Hubei high court. In respect of Ho Fens crime, the Hubei high academy rechecked to find out that in 2011 he and Peng Huagang did not exercise their power correctly when the Wuhan Huabao company and the Mulan Paper Co reported and eliminated the backward productivity awards. At the end of 2012, Huabao and Mulan paper two branch passed the acceptance of the leading group on the elimination of backward production capacity in Hubei Province, and received a total of 2 million 190 thousand yuan and 1 million 850 thousand yuan. In November 1, 2017, the Hubei High Court of OECD Council deliberated and made a decision that Peng Huagang and He Fen, as staff of the state organs, violated the authority of the law and abused their powers in the process of performing their duties, resulting in great losses in the interests of the state, and their actions were all constituted as a crime of abuse of power. The economic losses caused by the actions of the two people of Peng Huagang and He Fen to the state amounted to 4 million 40 thousand yuan, and the plot was particularly serious. It should be sentenced to more than three years and less than seven years of imprisonment according to law. Peng Huagang and He Fen have no legal or discretionary circumstances of punishment, and there is no special case of sentencing below the statutory sentence. Therefore, the Wuhan central court and the Huangpi court reported to Peng Huagang and He Fen not to approve the sentence under the legal punishment under the law, revoke the original sentence and return to the Wuhan central court for retrial. Before the lake went to the lake, he received a phone call to the court and left his words Peng Huagangs defender Wu Danhong introduced the Wuhan intermediate peoples court in March 19, 2018 to reopen Peng Huagang and ho Fen. I remember that in the court, he Fen clearly explained his authority and work in logic, and he did not abuse his power in his work. Because she was on bail pending trial, and had previously been exempted from criminal punishment, the work may still be retained. Wu Danhong said that the outcome of he Fens pursuit should be a verdict of innocence. He has been writing materials and sent to the Hubei peoples Congress, the high court, the procuratorate and other units. In the morning of April 28th, Ho Fen received a call from the judge. She said she had to go to the court in 15 minutes. Then he became wrong. After a call to the judge for more than an hour, my mother put us out and threw himself into the lake. Fang said. At 9:36 in the morning of April 28th, he gave his brother a farewell to WeChat: ... I have been fed up with anxiety and helplessness every day. Im really tired... On the same day, Peng Huagang, who had served his sentence, received a notice to the court. Zhang Diantao, his father-in-law, told the surging news that Peng Huagang had heard that the sentence would be increased, and then he saw his son-in-law sent to the detention center for detention. The source of this article: surging news editor: Yang Qiang _NN6027 He has been writing materials and sent to the Hubei peoples Congress, the high court, the procuratorate and other units. In the morning of April 28th, Ho Fen received a call from the judge. She said she had to go to the court in 15 minutes. Then he became wrong. After a call to the judge for more than an hour, my mother put us out and threw himself into the lake. Fang said. At 9:36 in the morning of April 28th, he gave his brother a farewell to WeChat: ... I have been fed up with anxiety and helplessness every day. Im really tired... On the same day, Peng Huagang, who had served his sentence, received a notice to the court. Zhang Diantao, his father-in-law, told the surging news that Peng Huagang had heard that the sentence would be increased, and then he saw his son-in-law sent to the detention center for detention.