Man shot 1 gun on his friends top, sentenced to 15 years for intentional homicide.

category:Global
 Man shot 1 gun on his friends top, sentenced to 15 years for intentional homicide.


Then a gunshot, a man shot overhead, fell in a pool of blood. Zhu Hailong, a man in Shaoyang, Hunan, tested a gun on the top of his friend Hu. The imitation 64 pistol in hand was originally loaded with bullets and loaded. Is Zhu Hailong guilty of negligent death or intentional homicide? This strange murder case, which occurred in the November 7, 2016, was decided by the second instance of the Hunan high court to determine that Zhu Hailong committed intentional homicide. In view of Zhu Hailongs indirect intentional crime, surrender and positive compensation, the criminal fact, nature, plot, repentance and the degree of harm to the society can be greatly reduced by the law. A light sentence shall be commuted to a life imprisonment of 15 years from the first trial of life imprisonment. Try a gun at the top of your head, a friend is killed under a gun The second trial criminal judgment published by the Hunan high court in the Chinese referees net shows that Zhu Hailong, born in 1982, was a person in Shaoyang, Hunan, and was originally a staff of Hunan treasure Jun international logistics city. In February 16, 2011, he was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment for robbery. In two years and six months, he was fined three thousand yuan and released in February 5, 2013. In November 9, 2016, he was detained on suspicion of intentional homicide and arrested in November 23rd of the same year on suspicion of negligence in causing death. Hunan high court trial found that in November 6, 2016, Zhu Hailong and Shaoyang city Hunan Bao Jun International Logistics City colleague Hu Mou (male, 26 years old) to suck drugs together, 7 days 20 Xu, Zhu Hailong and Hu together at the company to eat dinner, Zhu Hailong drank wine. Hu went to work in a dormitory and Zeng Xun sitting at the tea table. In the meantime, Zhu Hailong came to Zengs dorm with an imitated 64 pistol with a bullet and a bore, pointing a gun close to the head of Hus head playing a mobile phone, asking Hu whether the gun would be able to strike normally, and then a gun on the top of Hu Mouzuos head, causing a severe head injury and death on the spot. After that, Zhu Hailong placed his pistol on Hus hand and made a false impression that he was shot and killed, and fled the scene with his wife and son. A witness said he heard Zhu Hailong say that the firearm was brought back from Yunnan by the dead man Hu. In the first instance of the Shaoyang Central Academy, it was found that in November 6, 2016, Hu borrowed a Zhu Hailong coat to go out and returned a 64 pistol in Zhu Hailongs coat pocket when he returned his clothes. On the evening of 7, 8 oclock, Zhu Hailong discovered the pistol in his coat after drinking and wanted to return the pistol to Hu. Then, it happened. According to the testimony of witnesses, Zhu Hailong and Hu have good relations and no contradiction. Before the incident, Hu came to his dormitory. He sat at a tea table and prepared to boil water to make tea. Hu sat on his opposite side playing with his cell phone. As he bowed his head and fired tea, he suddenly heard Zhu Hailong come in and said, you guess this gun doesnt beat. then a shot rang, and when he looked up, Hu had already face down to the ground and the head was bleeding. According to forensic identification, the dead man was shot dead by another gunshot, resulting in severe brain injury. The identification and description of the related material evidence showed that the suspected firearms extracted from the scene of the case were powered by gunpowder to fill the 64 7.62mm pistol projectile, which could be normally hit, as a firearm, and the imitation 64 pistol needed the chamber before the firing. The next day, Zhu Hailongs wife led police officers to control Zhu Hailong voluntarily in the town of Xun Shui, Xinning County, Shaoyang. During the first instance hearing, Zhu Hailongs relatives compensated 220 thousand yuan for Hus relatives. Hus relatives were grateful to Zhu Hailong. In November 3, 2017, the intermediate peoples Court of Shaoyang made a criminal judgment of first instance: the defendant, Zhu Hailong, committed a crime of intentional homicide, and sentenced to life imprisonment and deprivation of political rights for life. After the sentence, Zhu Hailong was not convinced and brought an appeal. Zhu Hailong and his defender put forward: the victim Hu, when Zhu Hailong asked whether the pistol could be fired, Zhu Hailong opened the gun, causing Zhu Hailong to think that the pistol did not install the bullet and could not strike the hair. Zhu Hailong did not commit murder. His actions constituted only negligence of death and demanded a lighter sentence. Negligent death or intentional killing? Court: intentional murder, a light plot The second instance of the Hunan High Court held that Zhu Hailong was deliberately shooting at the head of the victim Hu, letting the death of Hus death, and his behavior constituted a crime of intentional homicide. After escaping from the crime, Zhu Hailong voluntarily surrendered himself in the process of being pursued, and after making a case, he truthfully confessed the crime. He gave himself up and could be given a lighter punishment in accordance with the law. In the second instance, Zhu Hailong and his defender put forward that Mr. Hu asked Zhu Hailong to shoot when Zhu Hailong asked whether the pistol could be fired, and that Zhu Hailong mistook the pistol for not loading and firing, and Zhu Hailong did not kill intentionally, and his behavior only constituted a crime of negligence causing death, and asked for a light sentence. Zhu Hailong claimed that he had forgotten the pistol gun in Zhu Hailongs coat and did not know that the gun had been loaded before firing. In this regard, the court found that, after the scene investigation, the gun had been loaded with bullets and had been loaded before the attack. According to Zhu Hailongs statement, Hu should be loaded with a pistol in the chamber. Hu gave Zhu Hailong a test shot to Hu in the case that the gun would cause serious casualties. At the scene of the scene of XXX proved that Zhu Hailong entered the room and asked, do you guess this gun does not hit, then a gunshot, Hu had no reaction before the gun. Therefore, Zhu Hailong put forward Zhu Hailongs shooting test without any other evidence, which is contrary to reason, and the reason for the appeal is not valid. Zhu Hailong confessed that he had not contacted a gun before committing the crime and did not know the performance of the gun. The Hunan high court believes that Zhu Hailong, a mentally normal adult, should be aware of the serious casualty consequences of firing a gun. When Zhu Hailong could not confirm whether the pistol was normal, he could shoot Hus head and let the result of Hus death. After the fall of Hus gun, Zhu Hailong did not take any first aid measures to prevent the death of Hu. Instead, he made a false image of Hus own gun. The Hunan high court believes that Zhu Hailongs mental state and behavior can not be identified by Zhu Hailongs negligence in the death of Hu, and the criminal responsibility of Zhu Hailong should be investigated with the crime of intentional homicide. Zhu Hailongs intentional homicide, causing serious consequences of Hus death, is also a recidivist and should be punished according to law. In view of the indirect intentional crime of Zhu Hailong, his voluntary surrender and positive compensation after the crime, he obtained the understanding of Hus relatives, and comprehensive Zhu Hailongs criminal facts, nature, plot, repentance and the degree of harm to the society can be greatly reduced to a lesser extent according to law. In February 7, 2018, the Supreme Court of the Hunan High Court made a judgment on the second instance: the appellant Zhu Hailong committed a crime of intentional homicide and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment and deprived of his political rights for three years. The source of this article: surging news editor: Yang Qiang _NN6027 Zhu Hailong confessed that he had not contacted a gun before committing the crime and did not know the performance of the gun. The Hunan high court believes that Zhu Hailong, a mentally normal adult, should be aware of the serious casualty consequences of firing a gun. When Zhu Hailong could not confirm whether the pistol was normal, he could shoot Hus head and let the result of Hus death. After the fall of Hus gun, Zhu Hailong did not take any first aid measures to prevent the death of Hu. Instead, he made a false image of Hus own gun. The Hunan high court believes that Zhu Hailongs mental state and behavior can not be identified by Zhu Hailongs negligence in the death of Hu, and the criminal responsibility of Zhu Hailong should be investigated with the crime of intentional homicide. Zhu Hailongs intentional homicide, causing serious consequences of Hus death, is also a recidivist and should be punished according to law. In view of the indirect intentional crime of Zhu Hailong, his voluntary surrender and positive compensation after the crime, he obtained the understanding of Hus relatives, and comprehensive Zhu Hailongs criminal facts, nature, plot, repentance and the degree of harm to the society can be greatly reduced to a lesser extent according to law. In February 7, 2018, the Supreme Court of the Hunan High Court made a judgment on the second instance: the appellant Zhu Hailong committed a crime of intentional homicide and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment and deprived of his political rights for three years.