[World Wide Web report reporter Liu Kun] recently, the topic of the US Army in Korea has continued to heat up, becoming the focus of public opinion in South Korea. The comments and reports of American and Korean media on American troops stationed in Korea and in South Korea have come out in an endless stream, and the plot has been repeatedly reversed in the rumor and refuting rumour. South Korea and the United States urgently refute rumors that the United States wants to reduce US troops in South Korea. In May 3rd local time, the New York Times issued a news report that President Trump has asked The Pentagon to consider cutting American troops in South Korea to prepare for it. The American media also said Trump had decided to withdraw from South Korea. He had always believed that the army was not worth it. The force was actually protecting Japan, and the presence of American forces for decades did not prevent the DPRK from becoming a nuclear state. As early as April 30th, Wen Zhengren, the special assistant to the diplomatic security of the president of South Korea, who was visiting the United States, wrote in the American Foreign Affairs magazine that if the Korean Peninsula is to be stopped and the mechanism is converted, the U.S. troops are in lack of legitimacy. Wen Zhengrens view then caused great controversy in Korean society. But in May 3rd, Wen Zhengren also said that for the strategic security of Northeast Asia and the political stability of the country, the peace agreement was still needed after the peace agreement was signed. Although South Korea and the United States have made a negative response to the reduction of US troops in South Korea, the topic of reducing the garrison still aroused widespread speculation in Korean society. South Korea 4 reported that the reduction of American troops in the United States recently caused widespread discussion in the United States, as the well-known media in the United States New York Times, disarmament reports can be described as no wind without wave. There is also a view that the United States and the DPRK summit meeting is in place, the United States can fully play the hand to reduce the US troops in Korea, in response to the security requirements after the denuclearization of the DPRK. US media release signals or issue cost sharing for US troops in South Korea to Han Shiya In addition, the United News Agency also said that the New York Timess above reports may also be the US Partys release signal, to pressure South Korea to share the cost of American US costs. This is Trumps creation of public opinion. South Korea and the United States have been pending the question of military spending. Negotiations on the issue may continue until the end of the year. The South Korean daily also believes that, from Trumps priority American priority policy, this will allow the United States to occupy a favorable position in South Korea and the United States in the negotiations on the defense costs of the US troops in Korea. During the election period, Trump mentioned that countries such as Europe, Korea and Japan need to take full responsibility for the military expenses of the U.S. troops stationed in Korea. After taking office, they had also asked South Korea to bear the related costs of the Saad anti missile system in the United States. In April this year, Trump had asked South Korea to assume the cost of strategic arms between South Korea and the United States after 2019. Against this background, South Korean media have speculated that reducing the US presence in South Korea will become the subject of talks between the US and South Korea. Trump, the chief Secretarial Officer of the former Diplomatic Security Secretary, said that if the DPRK said that the United States would abandon the North Korean army in the United States, then Trump would not refuse. Shen Fanzhe, director of the security reunification center of the Koreas asan Policy Research Institute, said Trump referred to the reduction of American troops in Korea, suggesting that the issue might be discussed in the US and DPRK negotiations on the denuclearization. Shen Fanzhe said that if the DPRK carries out a permanent, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization, the United States will also discuss the security requirements raised by the DPRK.