The woman was knocked down by an automatic parking pole and the family member claimed 1 million 610 thousand of the property.

category:Global
 The woman was knocked down by an automatic parking pole and the family member claimed 1 million 610 thousand of the property.


The plaintiff, Mr. Gong complained that in the morning of May 12, 2017, mother Fang went to a building in Shahe Town, Changping District, and was rushed to the ground when riding an electric bicycle through the guard and was rushed to the emergency center. The lady in the rear moved to a hospital in Shahe and was still unconscious during hospitalization. In February 3, 2018, Ms Fang died of aggravation. Mr. Gong appealed to a Property Management Company in Beijing, the property company of the building, to the court, requiring the property company to compensate for more than 161 million yuan, including medical expenses and death compensation. In the courtroom, Mr. Gong said that Mrs. Fangs brain vessel ruptured and died in a prolonged coma. Before the incident, Ms Fang was in good health and had no major and serious diseases. On the same day, Ms. Fang went to the bank to run a bank card. There were many people doing business in the bank. At 9:30 in the morning, Mrs. Fang was still on the phone with her daughter, but by the time 10:40, Mrs. fang had not yet arrived at the bank. At this point, Ms. Fangs daughter called Ms. Fang again when she heard from the security department. Mr. Gong believed that the defendant Property Management Company had wronged the death of the other woman. Security came only five or six minutes after the incident. There was no warning sign and warning. The railings installed by the defendant were mechanical, and Ms. Fang was about 3 meters behind a car. After Ms. Fang met the railings, the railing automatically rose up, causing the ladys brain to be damaged. If it was artificial, it would not happen. In addition, after Ms. Fang was injured, the Property Management Company had not been rescued in time. Even the ambulance was called by Ms. Fangs daughter, which led to Miss Fang when she was sent to the hospital and missed the best time for rescue. The defendant Property Management Company said Ms. Fangs death had nothing to do with the company, and it was different from Mr. Gongs entire lawsuit. The property company submitted photos of the road area in the area concerned, proving that the pedestrian passageway and the motor vehicle lane in the involved area are separate and have pedestrian passageway signs. Property company said that in the case of a pedestrian access, Ms. Fang chose to leave the motorway. As an adult, she should be able to recognize the danger of the railings. But Mr. Gong did not agree with them. They said that the sign of the pedestrian passageway was later installed by the property company. Ms. Fang did not have any signs when she had an accident. It can be seen from surveillance video that no security guard went to help Ms. Fang fall for about 3 to 5 minutes. The case did not appear in court. Source: Beiqing Net - Beijing Youth Daily editor in charge: Zhao Yaping _NN9005