A million businessman hired a murder chief to rehear the case.

category:Global
 A million businessman hired a murder chief to rehear the case.


Case review The assassination of business was transferred 4 times Mr. Wei, who was born in 1959, is the legal representative and general manager of Nanning Nature Garden Real Estate Co., Ltd., whose native place is Shandong. According to investigation by public security organs and accusation by procuratorial organs, Tan Mouhui, a merchant of Liuzhou who nicknamed Fourteen elder brothers, was suspected of investing 2 million yuan to hire Mr. Wei to assassinate Mr. Wei. This business has been transferred to four times, involving 5 suspects: Xi an an, the nickname a three of Mo XX, nicknamed Kang Yang Kang, nicknamed ah Guang Yang Guang, the nickname A Si Ling Mou four. Surprisingly, after a series of employment, the fee reduced from 2 million yuan to 1 million yuan, 500 thousand yuan, 200 thousand yuan, and 100 thousand yuan. Ling Mou four recalled that after receiving the assassination mission, he thought about it and felt that the 100 thousand yuan reward was too small. Once it was revealed, it would be worthless to lose it for a lifetime. He came up with an idea: find the assassin, Mr. Wei, frankly, let the other side cooperate with the forgery, and then cheat the 100 thousand yuan reward. The first trial is innocent The case is doubted and returned to retrial In December 26, 2014, Qingxiu sub Bureau of Nanning Public Security Bureau transferred Tan Mouhui and other 5 persons to the Nanning Qingxiu District Peoples Procuratorate for examination and prosecution. In May 2016, the court of Qingxiu district ruled that the 5 defendants were not guilty on the grounds of unclear facts and insufficient evidence. The Qingxiu District procuratorate believed that the facts of the case were clear and the evidence was indeed sufficient. The criminal responsibility of the 5 defendants should be investigated for intentional homicide. After the court of Qingxiu District procuratorate to the Nanning intermediate peoples court to protest, the intermediate court postponed the trial two times, that the original trial decided that the facts were not clear and the evidence was insufficient. At the end of 2016, the ruling revoked the first trial and returned to the retrial. The scene of the trial In the morning of May 3rd this year, in court No. 8 of the peoples Court of Qingxiu District, 6 defendants were unanimously returned when they were on trial. They all said they had been knocked by the personnel of the case of the case. However, some defendants failed to justify the prosecutors questions. When one of the defendants was arrested, the public prosecutor raised a photograph of Mr. Wei from his wallet and asked him, the picture is the one I picked up on the street, and I cant see who it is. The prosecutor questioned why the photo of a stranger picked up on a road was placed in his wallet. The defendant said, the man on the photo looks like my uncle. The defendant said that his confession materials and identification materials in the public security organs were not true, because the case handling personnel were all inducement, and the expressions of other defendants were similar. The defendants of the 6 defendants agreed that the 6 defendants did not want Mr. Weis life but kidnapped and extorted money. Both sides contend Todays trial of 2 million yuan employer The defender of the defendants side questioned that there was discrepancy between the transcripts of public security organs and the synchronized audio and video recording. In multiple interrogation video, the accused did not mention the words murder, hire a murderer and so on. However, in the written record, it appears in the written record that the written record does not have the truth and is insufficient to accept the letter. Mr. Weis agent replied that one of the videos could be seen, and the defendant, Moxon Xiang, naturally expressed he was a man, not a murderer when he was interrogated by the public security organ. In the video, the public security officer especially asked him the clear meaning of killing is kill. MOX Xiang called yes. In the court, the chief of the trial announced that the earlier trial was involved in the exclusion of illegal evidence, combing the questionable evidence one by one, and eventually eliminating a confession from the employer, Qin Hui. The confession mentioned that he had been mentioned for more than 24 hours and was confined to the black house. The relevant handling units explained that they only mentioned that Qin Hui was going out to do identification work. On the afternoon of 3, the Chief Justice announced that he would adjourn the court, and on the 4 day, the court heard 2 million yuan employer Tan Yu Hui. Source: South China Morning Post editor in charge: Zhang Xianchao _NN9310 Mr. Weis agent replied that one of the videos could be seen, and the defendant, Moxon Xiang, naturally expressed he was a man, not a murderer when he was interrogated by the public security organ. In the video, the public security officer especially asked him the clear meaning of killing is kill. MOX Xiang called yes. In the court, the chief of the trial announced that the earlier trial was involved in the exclusion of illegal evidence, combing the questionable evidence one by one, and eventually eliminating a confession from the employer, Qin Hui. The confession mentioned that he had been mentioned for more than 24 hours and was confined to the black house. The relevant handling units explained that they only mentioned that Qin Hui was going out to do identification work. On the afternoon of 3, the Chief Justice announced that he would adjourn the court, and on the 4 day, the court heard 2 million yuan employer Tan Yu Hui.