In response to China and Russia, the US defense chief asked the carrier to ghosts.

category:Military
 In response to China and Russia, the US defense chief asked the carrier to ghosts.


From the Baltic Sea to the Mediterranean, from the sea of Japan to the South China Sea, in order to deal with the constant movement of Russia and China in the eyes of the The Pentagon, the US Navy was exhausted. Matisse, the U.S. defense minister, was intolerable to the situation on the 3 day of defense news. He announced that to compete better with China and Russia would change the mode of deployment of the American aircraft carrier and make it difficult to predict. In 2017, three aircraft carriers in the United States gathered in the Western Pacific region. Making American carrier trends unpredictable The defense news entitled Secretary of defense Matisse is planning a fundamental change in the way the navy is deployed. The report described the American aircraft carrier as a departure from the Norfolk base: the wharfs tear - bye, the trip through the Atlantic, one or two port visits in Europe, and then the central command of the United States. There will be most of the time for cruising until the way back. This deployment mode has been mastered by US rivals and even the news media, and the outside world can even roughly estimate where the US carrier will appear. But that day may be over. In April 26, 2018, Washington, US Defense Secretary James Matisse (JamesN.Mattis) and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff Joseph Deng Fude (JosephF.Dunford) applied for a defense budget for the 2019 fiscal year at the Senate Military Committee hearing. Matisse has made it clear that the US Navy needs to get rid of such a regular and predictable way. He said on the House Armed Forces Committee, this is a good way for merchant shipping, but it should not be a way for the navy to operate. Reports say Matisse and chairman Deng Fude are seeking new ways of deploying these fleets. In an era of competition with China and Russia, Matisse believes that the Navy should appear in a place that is not expected, which can not only reduce the burden on the fleet, but also make the potential rivals more worried. When we send an aircraft carrier, the deployment may be more flexible. For example, there are 3 aircraft carriers in the South China Sea today. After two weeks, there may be only one ship, and the other two are in the India ocean. Our crew will return home after 90 days of deployment without having to spend 8 months on the sea. Internal questioning in the US Army According to the introduction, the current United States aircraft carrier formation in 36 months to run, including 16 months of training and maintenance, 7 months of overseas deployment time, in the other 13 months, the aircraft fleet to maintain a high level of combat readiness to prepare for the re deployment. The advantage of this model is that everything can be pre planned, including when to recruit new recruits, and when aircraft carriers need to undergo several years of overhaul. According to the plan, the shipyard can know when to prepare for the maintenance of the ship in advance. When the Academy knows when the recruits begin to train, the commander knows when they are ready to deploy. Matisses practice of adding fleets unexpected will disrupt this rhythm. Opponents believe that Matisses not playing the cards may bring serious negative effects. Last year, the US seventh fleet seemed to confirm this concern. The US Navy times revealed that the seventh fleet was due to the need to tap the ships to respond to the emerging state of the Asia Pacific Ocean, which led to a mess of personnel training and ship maintenance plans, so that the whole fleet was in a bad state. In the early morning of June 17th last year, the US Navys seventh fleet Fitzgerald destroyer collided with a Philippines cargo ship in the coastal waters of Japan, causing 7 US military personnel to die. The report also said, according to Matisse, 3 aircraft carriers to the South China Sea not only need to concentrate 3 full and well-trained aircraft and all the escort ships, but also the need for the cooperation of 3 carrier aviation units. Such a deployment has great impact on the overall plan of the US Navy. If it only stays for a few weeks, it will undoubtedly waste a lot of resources. Matisses idea of shortening the deployment time of aircraft carriers has also been questioned. Reported that the deployment time of 90 days will reduce the family pressure of ships and crew. But to a certain extent, the most basic geographical factors seem to have hindered this idea. At least one week from Norfolk to the Mediterranean will take at least one week from Norfolk to the Mediterranean, which means that the American aircraft carrier can only stay for about 2 months in the mission area of the central command, and the actual combat time is much lower than the existing plan, Thomas cared, the commander of the decommissioned submarine commander, said. If it is deployed farther, this will be more serious - it takes almost 3 weeks from the east coast of the United States to the Arabia sea, and a normal cruise from Santiago will take nearly a month to deploy to the South China Sea. What is the inspiration for the Chinese aircraft carrier A Chinese expert interviewed by ID:huanqiu-com said China was about to enter the era of multiple aircraft carriers. Considering that the United States has the worlds most abundant model of multi carrier rotation, the adjustment of the United States is worth learning. He believes that the United States, based on its own military strength and military needs, formulating the deployment plan of the aircraft carrier is both regular and flexible; it considers both combat readiness and as much as possible the family of officers and soldiers; it takes into consideration the strengthening of combat readiness and the sustainability of combat readiness. When China has multiple aircraft carriers, training and cruising are on the right track, we should also pay attention to the training and maintenance period of different aircraft carrier combat groups, not only to prevent the emergence of a blank area, but also to ensure that a number of aircraft carriers can be produced when necessary. The expert stressed that Chinas current situation and military situation are quite different from that of the United States for a long time. Therefore, it is not possible to copy the US practice. First of all, the number of Chinese aircraft carriers can not be compared with that of the United States, so we need to give full play to the limited number of aircraft carriers. Secondly, Chinas aircraft carriers do not need global frontiers in the short term like the United States. We are still looking at some relatively hot areas. Therefore, exploring the mode of aircraft carrier deployment and operation suitable for China is a problem that needs to be taken seriously at present.