US intelligence agency said North Korea began to dismantle cables from nuclear test sites.

category:Military
 US intelligence agency said North Korea began to dismantle cables from nuclear test sites.


[World Wide Web Report Ding Jieyun] Korea and DPRK unanimously affirm the common goal of denuclearization of the peninsula by completely abandoning nuclear weapons. The Panmunjom declaration issued in April 27th reads. This common goal seems to have progressed a few days ago. According to the United States Cbs Broadcasting Inc (CBS) 2 local time, the United States intelligence agency said that the DPRK has begun to dismantle the cable in the tunnel of the nuclear test field, which is considered the first step to the North Korean nuclear test site. South Koreas presidential palace Chong Wa Dae on April 29th, said that the DPRK chairman of the State Council, Kim Jeong-eun, 27, in conjunction with the South Korean President in Yin said, will be closed in May in the north of the nuclear test site Feng Xi Li. On the 3 day, the Korean intelligence agency also quoted the Korean intelligence agency as the day of the news that the No. 3 pit of the nuclear test site in Feng Xi Li had no previous movements. It is likely that the North Korean side will be ready to implement the consensus on the closure of the nuclear test site at the South Korean summit meeting. In April 27th, the DPRK and ROK leaders reached a historic meeting and published the Panmunjom declaration. The declaration said that the two Koreas agreed to achieve the goal of denuclearization of the peninsula by completely abandoning nuclear weapons, although no specific plans and timetable were mentioned in the declaration. CBS revealed that more substantive questions about North Koreas denuclearization, including when and how and so on, are expected to be discussed at the DPRK US talks. This statement is also similar to the Korean experts view of 27 World Wide Web reporters. Li Xiang, a professor at the South Korean National Institute for the polar East issue, said, the United States has been asking the DPRK to abandon its nuclear thorough, verifiable and irreversible way, this time only thorough, the remaining two aspects left to the summit. Huang Zaihao, a professor at the Korean foreign language university and director of the global security cooperation center, also believes that the denuclearization of the peninsula lies fundamentally in the settlement of the contradictions between the north and the United States, so the Korean and Korean meetings only make a principled statement, and the question remains to be left to the United States. President Trump has said he plans to meet Kim Jeong-eun in early May or early June. However, as time approached, the venue of the meeting was not officially announced. In April 30th, at a joint press conference with President Buhari of Nigeria, Trump said it was possible to hold talks in the South Korean military zone and call it an interesting option. Earlier in the day, Trump said on twitter, many countries are considered to be the place of meeting, but the peace house on the Korean border (the 27 day of the Korean Summit) / the free house, is not more representative and more important than the third party? Trump said, on the 30 day, that the Korean Peninsula is not realized. The chance of nuclear localization has never been so great. Kim Jeong-euns attitude is very open and candid. He said that his meeting with Kim Jeong-eun would be realized, and the DPRK was expecting it very much. The United States also liked to see it. He personally preferred the talks to be successful. And on the 1 of this month, Trump has said that the time and location of his meeting with Kim Jeong-eun are expected to be announced in a few days. The declaration of the Panmunjom also said that the Han Dynasty announced the end of the war during the year, to achieve a stop and mechanism transformation, and to build a solid and permanent Peninsula Peace system, and to make efforts to promote the three party talks between the Korean and the United States, or the four party talks between Korea and the United States. However, CBS said the two countries did not formally end the war because South Korea was not a direct signatory to the Korean Armistice Agreement, and the agreement was only a stop of military action, not equal to the end of the state of war. The source of this article: Global Times - global network. More brilliant, please log on to World Wide Web http://www.huanqiu.com editor: Liang Lian Fei _NBJS6165 President Trump has said he plans to meet Kim Jeong-eun in early May or early June. However, as time approached, the venue of the meeting was not officially announced. In April 30th, at a joint press conference with President Buhari of Nigeria, Trump said it was possible to hold talks in the South Korean military zone and call it an interesting option. Earlier in the day, Trump said on twitter, many countries are considered to be the place of meeting, but the peace house on the Korean border (the 27 day of the Korean Summit) / the free house, is not more representative and more important than the third party? Trump said, on the 30 day, that the Korean Peninsula is not realized. The chance of nuclear localization has never been so great. Kim Jeong-euns attitude is very open and candid. He said that his meeting with Kim Jeong-eun would be realized, and the DPRK was expecting it very much. The United States also liked to see it. He personally preferred the talks to be successful. And on the 1 of this month, Trump has said that the time and location of his meeting with Kim Jeong-eun are expected to be announced in a few days. The declaration of the Panmunjom also said that the Han Dynasty announced the end of the war during the year, to achieve a stop and mechanism transformation, and to build a solid and permanent Peninsula Peace system, and to make efforts to promote the three party talks between the Korean and the United States, or the four party talks between Korea and the United States. However, CBS said the two countries did not formally end the war because South Korea was not a direct signatory to the Korean Armistice Agreement, and the agreement was only a stop of military action, not equal to the end of the state of war.