Candidates for private interview with ballot number result in invalid performance. The plaintiffs office is dismissed.

category:Global
 Candidates for private interview with ballot number result in invalid performance. The plaintiffs office is dismissed.


But in the civil service examination, if it is regarded as a violation of discipline due to some matters that have not been paid attention to, it will be more than enough. The first left is the plaintiffs litigant agent Examinee interviewing for the serial number of the lottery In the civil service examination of Hunan province in 2017, Chen Dong, an examinee of Loudi (pseudonym), enrolled the township staff in Xinhua County, Loudi, and entered the interview with the first written test post. In June 18, 2017, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of social affairs organized an interview. In the draw, Chen Dong selected the serial number 9, and a friend of Chen Dongs friend was interviewed in the same field, and his friends draw number was No. 38. Chen Dong said, as his friends had urgent things to go home in advance, Chen Dong did not report to the staff of the examination room, exchanged the number of the lottery number 38 with his friend, and took the interview sequence in the order of number 38 after the exchange. Interview score 81.3 points, Chen Dongs written examination and interview results ranked first. After the end of the interview, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of social and social affairs received a report from Chen Dong on the same field. The Loudi Municipal Bureau of human society launched a survey to collect monitoring video data and instructions for the interview examination, and interviewed Chen Dong and the whistleblower in June 19, 2017. Here, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of human resources and social affairs listened to Chen Dongjis familys opinions for many times and explained them. Ineffective treatment of interview results In July 7, 2017, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of peoples society made the decision to deal with the violation of discipline and discipline in the civil service examination to Chen Dong, which gave Chen Dong the invalidity of the interview. In July 10, 2017, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of social affairs delivered the decision to Chen Dong. Chen Dong refused to accept this and applied for administrative reconsideration to the Hunan Provincial Peoples and social Bureau on 14 August 2017. In August 18, 2017, the Hunan Provincial Peoples social hall accepted Chen Dongs application for reconsideration. In November 6, 2017, the Hunan human society hall made the decision of the administrative reconsideration, and maintained the decision to deal with the violation of rules and regulations for the civil service examination and regulations made by the Loudi Municipal Bureau of human affairs to Chen Dong, and sent it to the Loudi Municipal Bureau of human society on the next day. In December 26, 2017, Chen Dong sued the two organs to the peoples court in Changsha Tianxin District because of the decision to deal with the decision of the Loudi Municipal Bureau of human society and the reconsideration of the Hunan Provincial Office of the peoples society, and asked the order to revoke the decision of the administrative reconsideration made by the office of the peoples society of Hunan, and to revoke the violation of the civil service examination of the Loudi Municipal Bureau of human affairs. Decision on handling of disciplinary irregularities. The court first tried to dismiss the original claim The court trial found that before the interview, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of people issued the notes on candidates for interview candidates and the letter of commitment to Chen Dong, and Chen Dong signed it for confirmation. The fourth items of the interview examination instructions stipulate that before the interview, the order and code are determined by the form of drawing, and the interview number is worn, and the interview is carried out in the order of the draw. the interview, the interviewer is led by the interviewer to the appointed interview examination room. The undertaking stated that I solemnly promise: first, consciously abide by the relevant provisions of the recruitment of civil servants and the relevant policies of the civil service examination in 2017; Five, abide by the discipline of examination, obey the examination arrangement, do not corrupt or assist others in fraud; Seven, to violate the above commitments, I will bear the corresponding responsibility voluntarily. The court trial held that Chen Dong, the plaintiff, took the number of interview number 9 in the interview draw link, and in the case of not reporting to the staff of the examination room, he exchanged the interview serial number with others privately and registered the interview sequence according to the number 38 after the exchange, and then the interview was followed by the serial number. The behavior belonged to the civil servant. In the sixth way (two) of the handling method for examination and employment of violation of discipline and regulations, the case of failing to sit in a designated seat for examination. In accordance with the provisions of this article, the plaintiff shall be treated invalid as a result of the examination. The defendant, the Loudi Municipal Bureau of social affairs, gave the plaintiff the invalid interview result, which met the above requirements. After receiving the application for reconsideration, the Hunan Provincial Peoples social hall shall examine and make reconsideration decisions in accordance with the law and shall maintain it. In May 3, 2018, the peoples Court of Tianxin District made a first instance judgment on the case: dismissed all the claims of Chen Dong. At present, the plaintiff has not yet made clear the appeal. Source: surging news editor: Qiao Jing _NN6607 In May 3, 2018, the peoples Court of Tianxin District made a first instance judgment on the case: dismissed all the claims of Chen Dong. At present, the plaintiff has not yet made clear the appeal.