The old man buried 140 thousand yuan in cash and was taken to court by 4 nephew.

category:Global
 The old man buried 140 thousand yuan in cash and was taken to court by 4 nephew.


One The old house collapsed and the underground deposit disappeared Lao Zhou is 78 years old. He is a disabled redemption soldier and a five insured household. He lives in the olive village of Desheng Town, Yizhou District, and has a monthly subsidy of more than 1000 yuan. The old man has no child and no daughter, and has saved a lot of money for decades and thrifty. But he did not deposit the money in the bank, but put it in a porcelain altar and buried it in the home and underground. One day in July 2017, the mud tile house in Lao Zhou was in disrepair and collapsed suddenly, so he went to live at his nephew Zhou Li. After a few days, he returned to his old house, but found that the cash in the porcelain altar and the altar was missing. Network mapping His nephew, Zhou Mougui, said that, because of the serious damage to the money in the porcelain altar, he and Zhou, after a few people in the scene, took the money to the bank and deposited it in a very expensive week, with a total of 140 thousand yuan. Several defendants said they had informed the plaintiff at the time they had saved money and had obtained his consent. However, Lao Zhou denied that his nephew had taken the money to deposit in the bank and deposited it in Zhous expensive account. After 6 months in his nephews residence, Lao Zhou decided to move out. Two The nephew says the old man knows the deposit and takes care of the old for a long time The defendant, Zhou Mougui, said the old mans house came to his house when the house collapsed, and he told them that who would handle the old mans fields, houses and property in the future. At that time, all 4 defendants were present, but this was only their oral legacy maintenance agreement without written agreement. Network mapping The defendant, Zhou Mouli, the father of Zhou Mougui, said the plaintiff had no children, a lack of labour and self-care, and had been providing food and care for many years. He figured out how much he spent during his stay at home, and the cost of nursing and living expenses was about 3720 yuan / month. 156 months from March 2004 to April 2017, before the plaintiffs house failed, Zhou Mouli and Zhou Mougui provided grain to the plaintiff, according to 30 jin a month, and the total amount of 3 yuan per Jin was 14040 yuan. During the collapse of the plaintiffs house, the two defendants took care of the house for 8 months, and the cost of nursing and living expenses was 3720 yuan per month. The house was rebuilt after the house collapsed, and the cement and labor cost were 11000 yuan. In May 2015 and June 2016, when the plaintiff was hospitalized due to illness, Zhou Mouli and Zhou Mougui were charged by the plaintiff for the medical expenses of 2728 yuan. Three The old man said he had been living alone and denied taking care of it Lao Zhou said that before the collapse of the house, he was living alone, and he was responsible for his illness. When the house collapsed, his nephew did not tell him how much money he had saved. He questioned more than 140 thousand yuan of money buried underground. Zhou Mouli, the defendant, said that uncle Zhou had lived well in his family, but later he was moved away from others by discord and went back alone to the new brick house. The scene of the trial In the trial, the two sides agreed to deal with the dispute, but the defendant asked the plaintiff to return more than fifty thousand yuan of cost, which was rejected by the elderly. Because of the differences of opinions between the two sides, the mediation will not be conciliation. At present, the case is still under further trial, and will be sentenced to sentencing. Source: South China Morning Post editor in charge: Qiao Jing _NN6607 In the trial, the two sides agreed to deal with the dispute, but the defendant asked the plaintiff to return more than fifty thousand yuan of cost, which was rejected by the elderly. Because of the differences of opinions between the two sides, the mediation will not be conciliation. At present, the case is still under further trial, and will be sentenced to sentencing.