Official Response of Informers of Toxic Land Case to Exposure False Tender of Fengqing Nutritional Food in Yunnan Province

category:Society
 Official Response of Informers of Toxic Land Case to Exposure False Tender of Fengqing Nutritional Food in Yunnan Province


On the morning of January 23, Mr. Li, who was in charge of bidding for the nutritional breakfast eggs procurement project in 2017, responded to the upstream journalists and said: The nutritional eggs procurement in 2017 was conducted through legal procedures, open and transparent, and in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations.

Government procurement contract signed after winning the bid.

Reporting: Purchasing Eggs Fake Bidding Conveys Millions of Interests

Zhou Jiangang reported in his microblog that the Fengqing County Education Bureau had many different requirements for the same project from 2012 to now. Effective protection of interest units won the bid, but openly inflated the purchase price.

Zhou Jiangang pointed out that in the tender for the nutritional breakfast eggs procurement project from March 2017 to January 2019 in January 2017, the tender document of Fengqing County Education Bureau stipulated that the weight of each fresh egg is greater than or equal to 50 grams. However, in the government procurement contract signed after winning the bid, the weight requirement of eggs became no less than 48 grams per egg weight.

Zhou Jiangang told upstream journalists that according to the relevant provisions of the Bidding Law and the Procurement Law, the procurement contract must be completely consistent with the bidding documents. Although the difference between 48g and 50g is only 4%, the difference between them is more than 530,000 yuan in the final contract value of 13328,000 yuan. Zhou Jiangang accordingly said, Collaboration should also be low-key, so blatant is who gives courage?

The winning bid price is higher than the second candidates offer of 1.58 million yuan.

Zhou Jiangang also reported on Weibo that there were also problems in the bidding process for nutritional breakfast eggs in January 2017. The total quotation of Yunnan Shuangjiang Sanxiang Breeding Co., Ltd., the winner of this nutritional egg project, was 13.328 million yuan, while the total quotation of the second candidate, Lushan Breeding Co., Ltd., Fengqing County, was 11.76 million yuan, which was higher than that of the second candidate, 1.58 million yuan.

Zhou Jiangang explained to upstream journalists that in 2017, the price of eggs in the local market was about 0.38 yuan per egg, plus transportation and other costs, and the price was about 0.58 yuan. But in the final contract signed by Fengqing County Education Bureau, the price of a single egg is set at 0.68 yuan, the price difference is about one corner. One egg purchase price is higher than 1.68 million yuan, and it is also higher than the market price. Why? Whose pocket is the difference of millions of dollars in and out?

Upstream journalists from the Chinese government procurement network found a number LCSFQXCG2017 (Gong) 002 Fengqing County Education Bureau March 2017 - January 2019 Nutritional Breakfast Egg Procurement Project Tender Bulletin. In the tender announcement for the purchase of 19.6 million eggs, in addition to the total purchase budget of 13.72 million yuan, the specifications and parameters of the announcement also indicate that the weight of each fresh egg is more than 50 grams, which is different from the condition of 48 grams per egg in the contract published by Zhou Jiangang.

Tender announcements found by upstream journalists on the Chinese government procurement website.

Official Response: Bidding in accordance with the formal process

On the morning of the 23rd, upstream journalists contacted Mr. Li of Fengqing County Education Bureau, who was responsible for bidding for the nutritional breakfast egg procurement project in January 2017. He said that the bidding for nutritional eggs in 2017 was conducted in accordance with relevant legal procedures and in accordance with relevant regulations.

Mr. Li said that after the signing of the government procurement contract, the Fengqing County Education Bureau also signed a supplementary agreement with the supplier, the supplementary agreement is consistent with the egg bidding documents. He explained that the purchase of eggs was based on the number of eggs, not on the total weight, but on the requirement of meeting the general standards for eggs.

In January 2017, Mr. Li said that the bidding in 2017 was entrusted to a third-party bidding company, strictly in accordance with the relevant legal procedures, there is no requirement to select the lowest bidder to win the bid, and the bidding is mainly based on comprehensive score. Upstream journalists from Zhou Jiangangs bid announcement showed that the price of the first transaction candidate, Yunnan Shuangjiang Sanxiang Breeding Co., Ltd., was higher than that of the second transaction candidate, Fengqing County Lushan Breeding Co., Ltd. 1.58 million yuan, but the comprehensive score of the first transaction candidate was 84.84 points, which was 1.34 points higher than that of the second transaction candidate. Mr. Li stressed to the upstream journalists that for the purchase of student food, from the point of view of food safety, low price is not the best, but also from the quality of food and other aspects of comprehensive consideration. Source: Upstream News Author of Chongqing Morning News: Hu Leis Responsible Editor: Su Honghong_NBJ9980

In January 2017, Mr. Li said that the bidding in 2017 was entrusted to a third-party bidding company, strictly in accordance with the relevant legal procedures, there is no requirement to select the lowest bidder to win the bid, and the bidding is mainly based on comprehensive score.

Upstream journalists from Zhou Jiangangs bid announcement showed that the price of the first transaction candidate, Yunnan Shuangjiang Sanxiang Breeding Co., Ltd., was higher than that of the second transaction candidate, Fengqing County Lushan Breeding Co., Ltd. 1.58 million yuan, but the comprehensive score of the first transaction candidate was 84.84 points, which was 1.34 points higher than that of the second transaction candidate.

Mr. Li stressed to the upstream journalists that for the purchase of student food, from the point of view of food safety, low price is not the best, but also from the quality of food and other aspects of comprehensive consideration.