Lifetime savings were taken to Guangxi by 4 elderly nephew.

category:Global
 Lifetime savings were taken to Guangxi by 4 elderly nephew.


Recently, the Yizhou District Peoples court heard a case of an uncle suing 4 nephews embezzlement of personal property. It is understood that the old man is childless, frugal, saved a sum of money, buried in the ground of his own house. After the collapse of the house, the old man stayed at his nephews house. The money was dug up by his nephew to deposit in the bank, and the old man did not know it. Their lifelong savings were misappropriated for no reason. The old man asked his nephew to return it, and he refused to take the 4 of them to court. The old house collapsed under the ground The plaintiff is 78 years old this year, is a disabled veterans, is the five insurance households, living in the village of Yizhou, Desheng Town, olive village, each month with more than 1000 yuan of state subsidies. The old man has no child and no daughter, and has saved a lot of money for decades and thrifty. But he did not deposit the money in the bank, but put it in a porcelain altar and buried it in the home and underground. One day in July 2017, the mud tile house in Lao Zhou collapsed and collapsed, so he went to live at his nephew Zhou Li. After a few days, he returned to his old house, but found that the cash in the porcelain altar and the altar was missing. His nephew, Zhou Mougui, said that, because of the serious damage to the money in the porcelain altar, he and Zhou, after a few people in the scene, took the money to the bank and deposited it in a very expensive week, with a total of 140 thousand yuan. Several defendants said they had informed the plaintiff at the time they had saved money and had obtained his consent. However, Lao Zhou denied that his nephew had taken the money to deposit in the bank and deposited it in Zhous expensive account. After 6 months in his nephews residence, Lao Zhou decided to move out. My nephew said that the old man had known for years that he had taken care of his uncle for many years. The defendant, Zhou Mougui, said he had come to his house when his uncles house collapsed, and he told them that who would have him in the future and who would deal with his fields, houses and property. At that time, all 4 defendants were present, but this was only their oral legacy maintenance agreement, and there was no written agreement. The defendant, Zhou Mouli, the father of Zhou Mougui, said the plaintiff had no children, a lack of labour and self-care, and had been providing food and care for many years. He calculated the cost of his home stay, and the cost of nursing and living expenses was about 3720 yuan / month. 156 months from March 2004 to April 2017, before the plaintiffs house failed, Zhou Mouli and Zhou Mougui provided grain to the plaintiff. According to 30 jin a month, 3 yuan per Jin should be calculated to be 14040 yuan. After the collapse of the plaintiffs house, the two defendants took care of the house for 8 months, and the cost of nursing and living expenses was 3720 yuan per month. After the housing collapsed, the house was rebuilt, and the cement and labor cost were 11000 yuan. In May 2015 and June 2016, when the plaintiff was hospitalized due to illness, Zhou Mouli and Zhou Mougui were charged by the plaintiff for the medical expenses of 2728 yuan. The old man said he had been living alone and denied taking care of it Plaintiff Lao Zhou said that before the collapse of the house, he was living alone, and he was responsible for his illness. When the house collapsed, his nephew did not tell him how much money he had saved. He did not know how much he had saved. He questioned more than 140 thousand yuan of money buried underground. Zhou Mouli, the defendant, said that his uncle had lived well in their home, and was later picked out from the accused and returned to the plaintiff to help the plaintiff to live in the newly built brick tile house. In the trial, the two sides agreed to deal with the dispute, but the defendant asked the plaintiff to return more than fifty thousand yuan of cost, which was refused by the old man. Because of the differences of opinions between the two sides, the mediation will not be conciliation. At present, the case is still under further trial, and will be sentencing on a date. Source: Hechi network editor: Zhu Xiaodong _NBJS6126 Plaintiff Lao Zhou said that before the collapse of the house, he was living alone, and he was responsible for his illness. When the house collapsed, his nephew did not tell him how much money he had saved. He did not know how much he had saved. He questioned more than 140 thousand yuan of money buried underground. Zhou Mouli, the defendant, said that his uncle had lived well in their home, and was later picked out from the accused and returned to the plaintiff to help the plaintiff to live in the newly built brick tile house. In the trial, the two sides agreed to deal with the dispute, but the defendant asked the plaintiff to return more than fifty thousand yuan of cost, which was refused by the old man. Because of the differences of opinions between the two sides, the mediation will not be conciliation. At present, the case is still under further trial, and will be sentencing on a date.