Passengers questioned the drivers arbitrary charges at night and were forced to get off the highway.

category:Global
 Passengers questioned the drivers arbitrary charges at night and were forced to get off the highway.


The plaintiff, Mr. Lin, claimed that at 11 oclock in the evening, he called the drop carpool after he got off the plane at the capital airport. After driving to the airport speed, the driver did not issue any bills, asking Mr. Lin for parking fees and toll. Mr. Lin said there was a doubt about the charge. When it used WeChat and the backstage customer service to verify the cost, the driver suddenly stopped to drive it out and put it in danger. Mr. Lin called on the main road of the freeway. After the police car arrived, he could not enter the main road on the auxiliary road. After walking for more than 30 minutes, he walked to the exit of the expressway. After the police took Mr. Lin back to the police station, his taxi home was at three in the morning and was unable to work on that day. Mr. Lin believed that the driver did not deliver his destination to the destination, and he did not pass the toll collection station. He did not produce any bills and asked for cash, which was illegal. The driver trains the driver, and the driver knows that the highway is a dangerous environment, but still let it out in the dangerous environment, which seriously threatens the safety of the person. Dripping off the drivers illegal behavior has not been investigated, suspected of shielding. Moreover, drivers information and vehicles are not in line with the registered vehicles on the dripping platform, and the drip travel regulation is not in place. In addition, Mr. Lin thought that he should have been working on the same day, but was frightened at the high speed on the road, delayed the rest of the night, failed to work, and went home from the police station to go beyond the original taxi fare, causing damage to it. At present, the case is in the process of further trial. Source: Legal Evening News - opinion editor: Qiao Jing _NN6607 Mr. Lin believed that the driver did not deliver his destination to the destination, and he did not pass the toll collection station. He did not produce any bills and asked for cash, which was illegal. The driver trains the driver, and the driver knows that the highway is a dangerous environment, but still let it out in the dangerous environment, which seriously threatens the safety of the person. Dripping off the drivers illegal behavior has not been investigated, suspected of shielding. Moreover, drivers information and vehicles are not in line with the registered vehicles on the dripping platform, and the drip travel regulation is not in place. In addition, Mr. Lin thought that he should have been working on the same day, but was frightened at the high speed on the road, delayed the rest of the night, failed to work, and went home from the police station to go beyond the original taxi fare, causing damage to it. At present, the case is in the process of further trial.