Is the Israeli Prime Ministers signal of Declaration of war war or bluff?

category:Military
 Is the Israeli Prime Ministers signal of Declaration of war war or bluff?


In April 30th, Israel was first reported to have air strikes in Irans military personnel in Syria, and then held a conference to show conclusive evidence of the Irans secret nuclear weapons program. Shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu gave a speech to accuse Iran of lying, the Israeli parliament passed the resolution by giving the prime minister and defense of Israel the right to declare war together. In April 30th, the Israeli I24 news channel reported that the Israeli parliament passed a proposal of 63 to 41 in April 30th, authorizing the prime minister and defence to declare war in extreme circumstances or to approve major military operations. The adoption of this proposal is, to a greater extent, the result of the game in Israels domestic political situation. Wang Jin, a research researcher at the Northwestern Universitys Syria Research Center, told www.thepaper.cn that Israel is now overemphasizing the threat of Irans nuclear problem and covering other domestic problems. Although it is good for Netanyahus ruling foundation, it is not a good signal for the overall security situation in Israel. . Criticize the Prime Minister for the right to declare war According to Israels National Earth News, Netanyahu proposed a proposal earlier on April 30th, requiring parliament to launch the power of the war to a smaller, security - centered cabinet group. According to the proposal, only half the members of the security cabinet agree to launch a war. In the extreme case, if it cannot be called to enough members, the Prime Minister of Israel can launch a war or a major military action, with the approval of the defence minister. The Israeli foreign and Defense Committee, as well as the constitutional, legal and judicial committees, then rejected Netanyahus request, but the subsequent vote in the Israeli parliament passed the proposal. It is very difficult to define the extreme situation defined by the proposal. Wang Jin, a researcher at the Syria Research Center at the Northwestern University, told www.thepaper.cn news that the incident was suddenly criticized in Israel. Previously, according to Israeli law, the Prime Minister of the country must declare war after the entire cabinet has voted. Today, the prime minister only needs to be approved by the Minister of defense. In addition, Al Jazeera has pointed out that, at present, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu wants to declare war to be supported by the defense minister, Avido Lieberman (AvigdorLieberman), but in the past, the situation of the Israeli Prime Minister at the same time as the Minister of defense is not very rare. In this case, the national war will be true. It is a word of speech. MichalRozen, an Israeli congressman, warned that the power poison should not be held in the hands of the few who have no balance power. (Michael Rosen) This bill enables the prime minister and the two leaders to not only bring Israel into war, but also drag the entire region into war. AidaTouma-Sliman, a member of the joint Arabia list, accuses Ada. From the point of view of Israels internal affairs, Netanyahus right-wing political alliance has occupied a relative advantage in Parliament. Through this resolution, it can greatly help the right wing control the domestic security situation and use it as a political chip to suppress other political factions. Wang Jin said. Should Iran worry about it? In addition to Israels domestic political factors, Wang Jin pointed out that from the point of time, the adoption of the proposal is indeed related to Israels external security environment. Over the past two months, Iran - related military bases in Syria have suffered three missile attacks. According to local media reports, the three missiles flew over Lebanon and fell into Syria. Israel was regarded as the main envoy. But Israeli officials did not deny it. On the list of the most potential hostilities in the world, Israel and Iran are at the top of the clash in Syria. NBC quoted 1 senior officials in the United States as saying. Three US officials told NBC that Israel seems to be preparing for military action and seeking U.S. help and support, including intelligence support. Israels tough attitude is to put pressure on the United States, but that does not mean that Israel tends to launch direct military attacks against Iran. Israel has always been accustomed to adopting this brinkmanship policy and promoting peace through high-pressure means. Wang Jin analysis said that there are a lot of military forces supported by Iran outside the borders of Israel, and Iran also has ballistic missiles that can strike Israel, and direct military conflict, Israel, is not cheap. Therefore, Israel is unlikely to fight directly to Iran. By creating an atmosphere of tension, Israel hopes to condense the international community, especially the consensus of the western world, to blockade and suppress Irans diplomatic, economic and social aspects, forcing Iran to curb its regional power and reduce or stop the development of nuclear weapons and missile technology. Wang Jin added. At the moment, the eyes of the world are focusing on Iran. In less than two weeks, US President Trump will once again judge whether Iran will abide by the Iran nuclear agreement. The Trump administration has been hoping to rewrite the Iranian nuclear agreement and threaten to withdraw from the agreement and restore sanctions against Iran, while Iran has threatened to reopen the nuclear weapons development. In this context, the French and German leaders who participated in the agreement have gone to the United States for the final lobbying, trying to pull the United States back in the Iraq nuclear agreement, and Israel also tightened its ties with the U.S. military and political leaders, with a view to cooperating with the United States to withdraw from the agreement and to join the Iran with the more severe. Sanctionu3002 Source: surging news editor: Lee Ying Ying _NBJS5961 Therefore, Israel is unlikely to fight directly to Iran. By creating an atmosphere of tension, Israel hopes to condense the international community, especially the consensus of the western world, to blockade and suppress Irans diplomatic, economic and social aspects, forcing Iran to curb its regional power and reduce or stop the development of nuclear weapons and missile technology. Wang Jin added. At the moment, the eyes of the world are focusing on Iran. In less than two weeks, US President Trump will once again judge whether Iran will abide by the Iran nuclear agreement. The Trump administration has been hoping to rewrite the Iranian nuclear agreement and threaten to withdraw from the agreement and restore sanctions against Iran, while Iran has threatened to reopen the nuclear weapons development. In this context, the French and German leaders who participated in the agreement have gone to the United States for the final lobbying, trying to pull the United States back in the Iraq nuclear agreement, and Israel also tightened its ties with the U.S. military and political leaders, with a view to cooperating with the United States to withdraw from the agreement and to join the Iran with the more severe. Sanctionu3002