Football Association: salary is not a reasonable allocation of funds for the club to fight against them.

category:Sports
 Football Association: salary is not a reasonable allocation of funds for the club to fight against them.


The Chinese Football Association did not publish the final limit rules at last weeks meeting, but only put forward a timetable for the 2021 season, requiring all the total salary of the first line players in the Chinese super and central a club to exceed 75% of the clubs total income. In this regard, some people believe that this is the Chinese Football Association to give professional club players to wear salary cap. But its not true. The relevant personages explained that the proportion of restricted salaries is still at the discussion stage, and the so-called limited salary and the setting of wage cap are strictly different. Since players trading is a market behavior, it is necessary to follow the rules of the economy, so as to follow other projects or other national league matches, the salary ceiling of professional players may not be in accordance with the law and the status of Chinese football. For example, the Australian Super League has set a salary cap of no more than 2 million Australian dollars for players, thus limiting the flow of high-quality players. So it is not difficult to understand the intention of Australias best players to get together in Europe. In the absence of high-level players, the level and influence of the league are limited. But the healthy development of the League also depends on the sustainable Club profit model. Therefore, in the design of restrictions, the Chinese Football Association tends to ratio. The Chinese Football Association has also referred to the UEFA fiscal fairness act, which has been strictly enforced in European football since the 2013 to 2014 season. The bill is intended to regulate the financial behavior of clubs, control Club deficit and punish teams who violate the rules. In May 2014, UEFA imposed a heavy penalty of 60 million euros on Britains super Manchester City and the French Paris Saint Germains violation of the financial fairness act. At the same time, the two teams were asked to reduce wages and limit the maximum number of single transactions. In addition, the enrolment of the two teams in the next season has also been reduced from 25 to 21. It is also based on a similar successful example, the Chinese Football Association has launched the next 3 seasons, Chinas super, China a club financial supervision and inspection methods, from the 2018 to 2020 season, the cumulative loss of each club in the total limit of no more than 450 million yuan, a cumulative no more than 135 million yuan a family. As far as the current development of professional football in China is concerned, it is not realistic to ask the club to turn quickly into profit. Therefore, limit salary has become an effective way to restrain the irrational investment of all the families. The Football Association official said that the purpose of the pay limit is not to attack the club, but to help them allocate funds reasonably. If the salary is reduced, the enterprising and professional attitude of the players will be improved. The savings can be transferred to the training of young people, club product design and all kinds of consumer services, such as home ticket, VIP service, clothing and sales of exclusive products, and so on, such as the League will no longer have a virtual table. Even if some small and medium-sized clubs are cautious, if they have more effort in cultivating talents, it can be achieved by cultivating talents and supplying and selling talents like the small and medium clubs in Europe. Text / reporter Xiao Nan this article source: Beiqing Net - Beijing Youth Daily editor in charge: Xu Song _NS1943 But the healthy development of the League also depends on the sustainable Club profit model. Therefore, in the design of restrictions, the Chinese Football Association tends to ratio. The Chinese Football Association has also referred to the UEFA fiscal fairness act, which has been strictly enforced in European football since the 2013 to 2014 season. The bill is intended to regulate the financial behavior of clubs, control Club deficit and punish teams who violate the rules. In May 2014, UEFA imposed a heavy penalty of 60 million euros on Britains super Manchester City and the French Paris Saint Germains violation of the financial fairness act. At the same time, the two teams were asked to reduce wages and limit the maximum number of single transactions. In addition, the enrolment of the two teams in the next season has also been reduced from 25 to 21. It is also based on a similar successful example, the Chinese Football Association has launched the next 3 seasons, Chinas super, China a club financial supervision and inspection methods, from the 2018 to 2020 season, the cumulative loss of each club in the total limit of no more than 450 million yuan, a cumulative no more than 135 million yuan a family. As far as the current development of professional football in China is concerned, it is not realistic to ask the club to turn quickly into profit. Therefore, limit salary has become an effective way to restrain the irrational investment of all the families. The Football Association official said that the purpose of the pay limit is not to attack the club, but to help them allocate funds reasonably. If the salary is reduced, the enterprising and professional attitude of the players will be improved. The savings can be transferred to the training of young people, club product design and all kinds of consumer services, such as home ticket, VIP service, clothing and sales of exclusive products, and so on, such as the League will no longer have a virtual table. Even if some small and medium-sized clubs are cautious, if they have more effort in cultivating talents, it can be achieved by cultivating talents and supplying and selling talents like the small and medium clubs in Europe. Wen / newspaper reporter Xiao Nan