The selling house is called Olympic champion. He takes no credit to the court and asks for 100 yuan.

category:Global
 The selling house is called Olympic champion. He takes no credit to the court and asks for 100 yuan.


In March 2018, the Olympic champion ho Tzu bought a dispute in Chaoyang Court. He and her husband, Qin Kai said, after paying a house deposit, the house can not pass the house, after that, I learned that the house did not have a property certificate, so the seller was charged with the return of 700 thousand yuan deposit and paid more than 400 million compensation. At present, the case has not been declared. The reporter learned that, after the end of the trial, the seller of Ms. Luo, on the grounds of breach of contract, in April 18, 2018 to prosecute another position to the court, requiring 100 yuan of compensation. According to Ms. Luos agent, the fact is not how to pose unilaterally. In January 2016, after signing a house sale contract by Ms. Luo and he and he, she began to deal with the property certificate. Since then, the property certificate could not be handled because of the discrepancy between the net signed information and personal information. In March 2016, Ms. Luo told the situation in time. After knowing the other side, he insisted on buying the house. As the housing property certificate can not be handled through the normal way, Luo has informed him of the side to terminate the contract, but the other party does not agree. In August 2016, the two sides agreed that Ms. Luo would return the room to the developer, and the developer would transfer it to Mrs. Luos wife and transfer it to him. Ms. Luo believes that after the agreement was reached, the two sides have already actively fulfilled the contract and have returned the house to the developer. However, due to the restriction of Beijings real estate policy, the housing property certificate has not yet been dealt with. In this case, she ordered the cancellation of the contract on the grounds that she had violated the original contract and purchased the house separately before the contract was lifted. Ms. Luo believes that hes behavior is a serious violation of the basic principle of honesty and credit, and violates the contract after the two parties have changed the contract. The act of relieving the contract is a breach of contract. And when a party in the case of buying a house, he deliberately created the fact that Mrs. Luo cheated. Responsibility for breach of contract. Reporters learned that Chaoyang Court has accepted the case, the dispute for housing sales contracts. The case is in the process of further work. Source: Legal Evening News - opinion editor: Zhao Yaping _NN9005 Ms. Luo believes that after the agreement was reached, the two sides have already actively fulfilled the contract and have returned the house to the developer. However, due to the restriction of Beijings real estate policy, the housing property certificate has not yet been dealt with. In this case, she ordered the cancellation of the contract on the grounds that she had violated the original contract and purchased the house separately before the contract was lifted. Ms. Luo believes that hes behavior is a serious violation of the basic principle of honesty and credit, and violates the contract after the two parties have changed the contract. The act of relieving the contract is a breach of contract. And when a party in the case of buying a house, he deliberately created the fact that Mrs. Luo cheated. Responsibility for breach of contract. Reporters learned that Chaoyang Court has accepted the case, the dispute for housing sales contracts. The case is in the process of further work.