Parents contributions to buy a house were registered and filed before the court in front of their daughter-in-law.

category:Global
 Parents contributions to buy a house were registered and filed before the court in front of their daughter-in-law.


In September 2014, after returning to Hefei from a part-time job, sun and his companion, considering the high years, decided to use years of savings to buy houses for residence in Hefei. As two people were unfixed income farmers, they were unable to handle bank mortgage loans, and then they decided to buy a house in the name of his daughter-in-law, Zhu. House. After paying the first payment and various taxes and fees, Sun Mou two old people paid the mortgage money monthly and lived there until now. In December of that year, Zhu and sun two old son agreed to divorce, agreed that the house had nothing to do with it, but asked sun not to overdue repayment to affect its bank credit. After that, sun asked Zhu to go through the formalities of housing transfer, and Zhu has been free, so he appealed to the court, asking for the property rights of Zhu to belong to the two old sun, and to assist in the registration procedures for the change of the ownership of the house. In this regard, Zhu argued that the 50% property owned by him was the property donated, and requested the court to dismiss suns petition according to law. After the trial, the court held that the old two children of sun had stated that they used their daughter-in-laws identity card to buy a house, which was obviously not in accordance with the state regulations concerning the management of resident identity cards and not in accordance with the common sense. Combined with the social customs and habits, this act should be identified as the common gift of sun and Lao couple to Zhu, and to maintain the relationship between his son and Zhu. Due to the divorce of Zhu and suns son in a few short months, it should not be realized as a gift. But because sun failed to revoke the gift in time, the property right of the gift has been transferred, and sun has no right to withdraw. Therefore, the above decision has been made according to the law. Source: Zhong an online editor: Zhao Yaping _NN9005