The media commented extubation: not to drag the KMT down the DPP.

category:Society
 The media commented extubation: not to drag the KMT down the DPP.


On Friday, April 27th, the Ministry of education chose to announce the final decision on Friday night. One days political programme was recorded before the evening, and there would be no program to discuss the highly controversial issue; on the other hand, it was hoped to use the weekend to let the people come. Digest, reduce the peoples rebound. From this point of time alone, we know that this matter is very tricky. The more rigorous selection is the enemys incorrect color. Now lets review the general course of National Taiwan Universitys selection of principals. Why should National Taiwan University select the principal? Because former president Yang Panchi resigned from office on suspicion of thesis fraud. As a result, the school party held a temporary school meeting in June 24, 2017 to start the selection mechanism of the principal, which was selected by 173 representatives of the school affairs conference to select the 18 selection committee and the 3 selection members assigned by the Ministry of education to form the principal selection committee. Chung-Ming Kuan After a long and rigorous course of operation, such as the recommendation + my consent, the qualification examination, the selection of the candidates and the candidates, the interview with the candidates, the presentation of the school philosophy, the selection of the Committee and the candidates, the referendum of the school council and the voting of the two rounds of the selection committee, the final January 5, 2018, Taiwan The principal of the school principal selection committee is elected by Guan Zhong min. If the result of the selection is reported to the Ministry of education according to the due process, the Ministry of education shall be given a letter of appointment to the president of National Taiwan University, and he should be formally appointed in February 1st this year (before the beginning of the new term). Perhaps as the result really came from the expectations of the DPP authorities, the dispute on Guan Min was announced through a specific green media after the announcement of the selection results, roughly divided into three parts: Min in the tube copied his students papers. Before the election, he did not voluntarily disclose his part-time director of Taiwans big brother, and had an interest avoidance with Cai Mingxing, the chairman of the Taiwan mobile group. Min Min had taught in mainland China and was suspected of illegal part-time work. In the process, the former Minister of education, formerly responsible for dealing with the matter, asked Pan Wenzhong to leave the stage in April 14th for the opportunity to let the president of National Taiwan University choose the dispute to be re - clarified. In April 19th, Wu Maokun, the newly appointed Minister of education, came to power in a number of academic controversies. In April 27th, the Ministry of education, with the above second points of dispute as the main reason, believed that when Min Min participated in the election, he did not actively expose the relationship between the selection of Cai Mingxing and the selection of the independent director of Taiwan. It also resulted in the serious defects of Cai Dong cast Dong, and there was an unavoided economic and legal benefit. In doubt, Taiwan University has not been responsible for examining the discomforting candidates, forming biased and unfair competition for other referees, violating the principle of due administrative procedure, and finally the Ministry of education decided not to appoint, and asked the whole case to return to the selection committee to examine and examine the qualifications of the principal candidates. The survey was conducted by the Taipei geological survey and the supervisory Institute. To tell the truth, Guan Zhong mins election can tell everyones accidents, including Guan Min himself. The reason why you did not think is very simple, because Guan Min is the two generation of people in the province and served as a high official in Ma Ying-Jeous office. This is a complete political incorrectness for the ruling Democratic Progressive Party. National Taiwan University is the highest school in Taiwan. The leaders of the Taiwan region, Li Denghui, Chen Shuibian, Ma Ying-Jeou and Cai Yingwen after the overall election, have also graduated from National Taiwan University. How can the principal of such an index university be assured of a person who is completely different from his own color? Even if his academic achievements are high, the idea of running a school is good. The so-called color determines the future. But the Ministry of education rejects the reason for the management of Min Min, only to say that it is to pick the bones from the egg, as long as the selection method of the Grand President of the stands knows, and the candidate does not ask for the initiative to inform all of his own part-time (including independent directors). At the same time, the independent director of Taiwan is a complete public information, even if it is selected. The Committee has not found it, but it can not be said that central min is concealed voluntarily; there is also a standard in the selection method of the president of Taida, and the relationship between min and Cai Mingxing is not to be avoided. Not to mention that there are three designated representatives of the Ministry of education in the selection committee of the president of the Taiwan University, including the Minister of education, Yao Lide. It can be said that the Ministry of education has a complete grasp of the selection process of the president of Taida, if any objections can be put forward in the selection process, not after the selection. Review it again. Of course, if the Ministry of education feels that such a selection method is not thorough, it may also require amendments to the selection method and start from the next selection. Now, we must reject this as the reason why President min was elected president. What is more interesting is that the matter has been burned for months in the media, and if this reason is enough to hold the tube, why did the former Minister of education Pan Wenzhong have been reluctant to make a decision and leave the stage? It is understood that Pan Wenzhong has been asked to leave the Minister of education for other reasons, but the high level hopes that he will resign after the card case, so the follow-up person will not continue to deal with it. In order to card pipe, X Lets take a look at what amazing words the DPP officials say for card management. For the part-time part-time part of the management of Minmin to the land, the chief of the Ministry of education Lin Teng said, there is no serious violation of the law at present, but it is not illegal now, and it does not represent the violation of the law behind. The media asked Minister of education Wu Maokun, the selection is democracy, right? Wu Maokun returned, there is no real democracy in scholarship. People with some legal literacy should know the basic principle of presumption of innocence, and no violation of the law now does not represent a violation of the law in the back. Is it to be presumed to be guilty? First do not say the Ministry of education is not the judicial organ, it is not the Ministry of education to determine whether there is any law in the administration of Min Min, but is it not the principle of presumption of innocence before the judiciary determines that it is guilty? It can only be said that in order to manage the card, there is no need for it. After each election in Taiwan, many candidates were accused of bribery and other derivatized cases in the electoral process. The general practice is not to let the candidate take office first. If the final judicial decision is guilty, then deprive the public of public power. Should we wait until the judicial process is over, let us decide whether or not the candidate can take office? According to the judicial efficiency of Taiwan, probably the whole case is confirmed, and its term of office is almost there. Wu Maokun, more controversial, did not mention his more than 160 day leave for a year as president of the Donghua University, and a number of suspected mainland research institutions as advisers. Does the mainlands relevant research institutions explain? It has been put out for hundreds of times when the controversy has been put on other people and has recently been stolen from the Donghua University to apply for patents in the United States and the mainland. He said that there is no real democracy in academia, which is very politically incorrect in the atmosphere of Cai Yingwens administration by democratic success to brainwash the people of Taiwan and to strengthen the belief in the mainland. Is he going to step down? At least it seems that Wu Maokuns position is stable, after all, will be willing to resist huge pressure to finish the last foot of the card pipe at this time, the Cai Yingwen authorities must be strong, if he goes again, who is the next mess to be cleaned up? At last, I would like to see Xu Guoyongs speech. Basically, his speech is understood from the opposite side. When he emphasizes something more, thinking in opposite directions is usually closer to the truth. Obviously, of course, there is political intervention in this matter. Otherwise, how can it be delayed for a long time before a minister of education is changed? Political problems can only be solved politically In the face of the continuous decline in the competitiveness of higher education in Taiwan (research environment, salary, etc.), the position of the university is declining, and the magnetic absorption effect produced by the 31 policies of Hui Tai on the mainland, the only possibility that the higher education in Taiwan can follow the global scientific research talents and students may be left to university autonomy and academic science. Freedom. If not, what will Taiwans higher education compete with the rest of the world? The president of National Taiwan University does not seem to be a very important position. Why should the DPP fight for it? Very simple, for the DPP, there is absolutely no place. After 2016, the improper party and production committee established by the Democratic Progressive Party authorities and the Commission for the promotion of transition justice were also in addition to the complete collapse of the Kuomintang, but also a high salary position for its own people. After that, the chairman of the irrigation and water conservancy association was changed to official school. Therefore, if we look at this vein, the pipe is only a continuation action of the DPP. It is obvious that the card pipe event is a political event. Now, although the teachers, students and alumni have launched the Taiwan University Independent alliance, the call for resistance, some educational groups, such as the General Education Industry Federation of trade unions, the General Federation of teachers unions, are resisting the present education through their own actions. Ministers and so on, but these are still insignificant to the ruling DPP. Dont forget, they have gained power through numerous social movements. Of course, a more important observation is the election of the mayor of the county in November 24th of this year, the general election in 2016, and the about 3000000 votes of the DPP, making them feel that everything is scruple. In the face of the democratic political party of the Democratic Progressive Party, only the people of Taiwan use the strongest and only weapon - their own votes - to let the Democratic Progressive party be defeated, so that they can leave the brink of the precipice. Otherwise, something more serious than the tube will always happen. It is also the way to persuade the supporters of the blue camp that, in Taiwan, where the blue and green high and the ethnic groups are difficult to merge, the votes are used to punish the most important enemies, not to punish themselves. When all positions (public opinion representatives + County mayors) are green, are their own voters not accomplices? There are always some blue battalions who think that they do not even vote. They feel that they can punish the Kuomintang and punish themselves. People in green camp have always been scolding Cai Yingwen for not making a name for the constitution, but they must go when they vote. Democratically elected for so many years, even if these basic desktop democracy ABC did not learn to understand, it really has been through these years of democratic training. Source: observer net responsibility editor: He Yufang _NN5632 Of course, a more important observation is the election of the mayor of the county in November 24th of this year, the general election in 2016, and the about 3000000 votes of the DPP, making them feel that everything is scruple. In the face of the democratic political party of the Democratic Progressive Party, only the people of Taiwan use the strongest and only weapon - their own votes - to let the Democratic Progressive party be defeated, so that they can leave the brink of the precipice. Otherwise, something more serious than the tube will always happen. It is also the way to persuade the supporters of the blue camp that, in Taiwan, where the blue and green high and the ethnic groups are difficult to merge, the votes are used to punish the most important enemies, not to punish themselves. When all positions (public opinion representatives + County mayors) are green, are their own voters not accomplices? There are always some blue battalions who think that they do not even vote. They feel that they can punish the Kuomintang and punish themselves. People in green camp have always been scolding Cai Yingwen for not making a name for the constitution, but they must go when they vote. Democratically elected for so many years, even if these basic desktop democracy ABC did not learn to understand, it really has been through these years of democratic training.