Ding Man is a 20-year-old adult with full civil capacity. He really has a responsibility to pay for the mistakes he made.
A cleared graffiti scene. Beiqing Shenzhen Wechat Public Number Map
But this does not mean that the public security organs are completely properly handled. Whether the serious consequences of young people graffiti on the streets have been brought about and whether they have to be served by criminal law is a matter of great controversy, especially when the business and community affected by their rights and interests have expressed their understanding.
It is also interesting for local judicial departments to give different charges of prosecution. From the criminal detention of the crime of intentional destruction of property at the beginning, to the fact that the price confirmation letter issued by the procuratorial organ was considered unreasonable, the economic loss caused by Timon could not reach the standard of 5000 yuan, so the crime was not established. Therefore, it was changed to the crime of provoking trouble - the conviction standard of this crime is more than 2000 yuan, which can be investigated for criminal responsibility.
It is necessary for the local judiciary to clarify the internal circumstances of this change. The social perception it conveys should be faced squarely. First, street graffiti is associated with the offence of provoking trouble, which is contrary to social common sense and general expectations; second, the change of the offence gives people the impression that the claw must be compared at least from the perceptual level. People subconsciously think that the local judiciary is determined to make this a criminal case.
Such a case-handling image corresponds to a 20-year-old college student and his graffiti behavior, which can be regarded as a double-loss both in terms of judicial credibility and the parties concerned. ?
In addition, when it comes to the absolute attitude of the judiciary, one background has to be mentioned, that is, the local government is creating articles. Whether the handling of the case is related to the administrative needs of the Creation and whether the judicial disposal is really impartial will inevitably give rise to associations.
Over the years, more and more young people like graffiti. This reflects the openness and pluralism of social culture. Graffiti advocates detachment and freedom. It does conflict with traditional urban street management. However, how to control the conflict within a certain range, we can not just think of the law to kill without amnesty.
In recent years, universities in Harbin, Wuhan and other cities have opened up creative graffiti walls for students. Municipal departments in Guangzhou, Zhuzhou and other cities have actively invited students to create graffiti on street public facilities. It not only complements the street landscape, but also gains the publics favor. These signs indicate that the acceptance of graffiti is increasing in society as a whole, including the public sector.
Correspondingly, in dealing with such issues, the judiciary should also take appropriate measures. This is also graffiti on the white paper of young peoples life, and must not be trustworthy. For culture, art and young people, proper tolerance is indispensable. There are many ways for young people to learn long lessons on some issues. Penalty is not the best choice.
Source of this article: Peng Mei News Responsible Editor: Jike_b6492