Cohabitation girlfriend abdominal pain 12 hours dead boyfriend: buy medicine gruel also hit 120.

category:Global
 Cohabitation girlfriend abdominal pain 12 hours dead boyfriend: buy medicine gruel also hit 120.


12 hours after the rescue of the death of invalid death Womens parents think her boyfriend has delayed the rescue time Bring it to the court for a claim of nearly 140 thousand yuan The daughter was killed by her parents and her boyfriend The claim is nearly 140 thousand yuan Guangdong Zhongshan woman A Hua (alias) and A Wei (a pseudonym) met in 2015, then established lovers and cohabitation, living in A Weis house. At 12 p. m. on July 19, 2016, a flower began to have abdominal pain at home. On the second morning, a flower still felt a pain in the lower abdomen. Ah Wei went to the drugstore to buy medicine for it. At 12 oclock at noon, he dialed 120 emergency calls and lost consciousness about 20 minutes. The rescuer was rescued but died. Network map The parents of a flower said that when the defendant A Wei began to have abdominal pain in a flower, he did not send it to the hospital in time, and the rescue time was delayed. For this reason, the parents of the Hua Hua complained to the court, claiming that the defendant A Wei should be responsible for 20% of the death compensation of 139028 yuan. In addition, the plaintiff added the fact that it was an obvious fault for Ah Wei to buy medicine for a flower, and that two people began to live together in 2016, and the ectopic pregnancy was caused by Ah Wei. The boyfriend argued that: Ive already bought 120 medicine for porridge In the case of the event, Ah Wei argues that: 2. many times he had sent him to the hospital for treatment, but they were all refused. He had no fault for his timely treatment. 3. after receiving the information about the pain in the stomach, he went to the escort, bought the medicine on the next day, and cooked the porridge to the flower. After that, he found that the flower was very painful, that is, dialing 120. 4. they bought medicine according to the request of Hua Hua, and the death of AI had nothing to do with taking medicine. The court found that in March 2016, he had been hospitalized and diagnosed as infertility in the hospital. In addition, a pharmacy in Zhongshan Dongfeng Town, the head of a pharmacy old Li (pseudonym) in receiving the police station interrogation, said: at 8:30 in July 20, 2016 Xu, a man to his place to interrogate stomach pain to buy medicine good point, so he recommended abdominal tablet and intestinal Kang tablets, the man bought a box. The court verdict: Only care did not actively fulfill the obligation to send medicine The court holds that, according to the sixth article of the tort liability law of the Peoples Republic of China, the perpetrator shall bear the tort liability for the infringement of the civil rights and interests of others because of the fault. In this case, there is a specific relationship between the dead flower and the defendant Ai Wei, which is a love cohabitation relationship. When the woman is ill, the man has the duty of reasonable attention and relief. According to the statement of the defendant A Wei in the public security organ, it is known that at 00 July 20th, the flower told his stomach pain, at 8 when Xu Awei went out for his purchase, then he took the medicine. At 12, he said the pain was good, and the defendant A Wei dialed 120 for help. It was obvious that A Wei had been aware of the pain in the stomach for 12 hours, and in the four hours after the pain was still in the stomach after taking the medicine. A Wei was only looking after the obligation to deliver medicine, so that the flower lost the opportunity to cure and died, so A Wei should bear the tort liability. At the same time, the main reason for the death of AI is the ectopic pregnancy. Combined with the fault of Wei and the loss of the plaintiff, the court decided the defendant to compensate the plaintiff for 80 thousand yuan. Regarding the plaintiffs claim that the defendant, A Wei, has the fault of ectopic pregnancy, the court believes that the deceased and the defendant, A Wei, are both adults and have complete civil capacity. A Wei and his wife did not apply for marriage registration, that is, the voluntary life of both sides. Therefore, defendant A Wei had no fault for ectopic pregnancy. The court held that there was no causal relationship between the death of a flower and the nature of the drug taken, and the plaintiff argued that the defendant was in fault with the law, and the court did not support it. Judge Ma Mengqiu, who heard the case, said: cohabitation before marriage, unmarried pregnancy and abortion are common in daily life, causing a lot of disputes. Because of the different rights, duties and legal status of the parties in the relationship of cohabitation and the relationship between husband and wife, the two sides have a larger dispute and difficult to seek relief ways when the right of life, the right to health, and the property right of the one party in the cohabitation relationship are damaged. The court does not advocate unmarried cohabitation, and encourages young people to attach importance to legitimate marriage relations. Only in the framework of the law can they better protect their rights. Source: Peninsula Morning Post editor: Xun Jianguo _NN7379 The court held that there was no causal relationship between the death of a flower and the nature of the drug taken, and the plaintiff argued that the defendant was in fault with the law, and the court did not support it. Judge Ma Mengqiu, who heard the case, said: cohabitation before marriage, unmarried pregnancy and abortion are common in daily life, causing a lot of disputes. Because of the different rights, duties and legal status of the parties in the relationship of cohabitation and the relationship between husband and wife, the two sides have a larger dispute and difficult to seek relief ways when the right of life, the right to health, and the property right of the one party in the cohabitation relationship are damaged. The court does not advocate unmarried cohabitation, and encourages young people to attach importance to legitimate marriage relations. Only in the framework of the law can they better protect their rights.