Girlfriend abdominal pain 12 hours after death boyfriend: I have bought medicine gruel to fight 120

category:Global
 Girlfriend abdominal pain 12 hours after death boyfriend: I have bought medicine gruel to fight 120


The claim is nearly 140 thousand yuan Guangdong Zhongshan woman A Hua (alias) and A Wei (a pseudonym) met in 2015, then established lovers and cohabitation, living in A Weis house. It was identified that he died of hemorrhagic shock due to ectopic pregnancy and rupture and bleeding on the right side of the fallopian tube. Ive already bought 120 medicine for porridge 2. many times he had sent him to the hospital for treatment, but they were all refused. He had no fault for his timely treatment. 3. after receiving the information about the pain in the stomach, he went to the escort, bought the medicine on the next day, and cooked the porridge to the flower. After that, he found that the flower was very painful, that is, dialing 120. 4. they bought medicine according to the request of Hua Hua, and the death of AI had nothing to do with taking medicine. 5. the flower itself has diseases and conceals itself. It is not related to itself and has no statutory compensation obligation if it fails to treat hemorrhagic shock and death in time. The court found that in March 2016, he had been hospitalized and diagnosed as infertility in the hospital. In addition, a pharmacy in Zhongshan Dongfeng Town, the head of a pharmacy old Li (pseudonym) in receiving the police station interrogation, said: at 8:30 in July 20, 2016 Xu, a man to his place to interrogate stomach pain to buy medicine good point, so he recommended abdominal tablet and intestinal Kang tablets, the man bought a box. The court verdict: Only care did not actively fulfill the obligation to send medicine The court holds that, according to the sixth article of the tort liability law of the Peoples Republic of China, the perpetrator shall bear the tort liability for the infringement of the civil rights and interests of others because of the fault. In this case, there is a specific relationship between the dead flower and the defendant Ai Wei, which is a love cohabitation relationship. When the woman is ill, the man has the duty of reasonable attention and relief. According to the statement of the defendant A Wei in the public security organ, it is known that at 00 July 20th, the flower told his stomach pain, at 8 when Xu Awei went out for his purchase, then he took the medicine. At 12, he said the pain was good, and the defendant A Wei dialed 120 for help. It was obvious that A Wei had been aware of the pain in the stomach for 12 hours, and in the four hours after the pain was still in the stomach after taking the medicine. A Wei was only looking after the obligation to deliver medicine, so that the flower lost the opportunity to cure and died, so A Wei should bear the tort liability. At the same time, the main reason for the death of AI is the ectopic pregnancy. Combined with the fault of Wei and the loss of the plaintiff, the court decided the defendant to compensate the plaintiff for 80 thousand yuan. Regarding the plaintiffs claim that the defendant, A Wei, has the fault of ectopic pregnancy, the court believes that the deceased and the defendant, A Wei, are both adults and have complete civil capacity. A Wei and his wife did not apply for marriage registration, that is, the voluntary life of both sides. Therefore, defendant A Wei had no fault for ectopic pregnancy. The court held that there was no causal relationship between the death of a flower and the nature of the drug taken, and the plaintiff argued that the defendant was in fault with the law, and the court did not support it. Judge Ma Mengqiu, who heard the case, said: cohabitation before marriage, unmarried pregnancy and abortion are common in daily life, causing a lot of disputes. Because of the different rights, duties and legal status of the parties in the relationship of cohabitation and the relationship between husband and wife, the two sides have a larger dispute and difficult to seek relief ways when the right of life, the right to health, and the property right of the one party in the cohabitation relationship are damaged. The court does not advocate unmarried cohabitation, and encourages young people to attach importance to legitimate marriage relations. Only in the framework of the law can they better protect their rights. Judge Ma Mengqiu, who heard the case, said: cohabitation before marriage, unmarried pregnancy and abortion are common in daily life, causing a lot of disputes. Because of the different rights, duties and legal status of the parties in the relationship of cohabitation and the relationship between husband and wife, the two sides have a larger dispute and difficult to seek relief ways when the right of life, the right to health, and the property right of the one party in the cohabitation relationship are damaged. The court does not advocate unmarried cohabitation, and encourages young people to attach importance to legitimate marriage relations. Only in the framework of the law can they better protect their rights.