To be threatened by bloodwashing the whole family In April 15th, Li Haifeng, a Zhengzhou consumer, bought two single dried fruits, such as a single tree and a raisin, in a shop named left fresh Xinjiang special products in Taobao. After receiving the goods, he found that several products had different weights and weights in varying degrees, and there were also some defective products. Li Haifeng said he contacted the businessman and raised his own doubts. He did not expect the other side to have a bad attitude and began to threaten constantly. Li Haifengs Taobao chat chat shows that at the very beginning, both sides were more restrained. Li Haifeng questioned the quality of the goods, and did not expect that the merchant sent a case full of threats: the day before yesterday, a student received my blueberry, saying it was false. I explained to her that she didnt listen, bought it before, and gave it three bad reviews, and then I bought the same money from the other 3 stores and sent it to their schools political and educational office. Li Haifeng, who felt threatened, expressed his dissatisfaction. I think such a situation, I want to give the merchant a bad review. Li Haifeng said. After Li Haifeng put forward all the negative reviews, the merchant said, you have bad reviews. I will buy tickets immediately. Since then, it is a curse of wanting to die and being polite to yourself. Another scene that Li Haifeng did not expect emerged: businessmen urged Li Haifeng to give bad reviews in chat, and then said bloodbath your whole family. In the chat, merchants also left a sentence: buyers like you do not kill a few, it really can not do. In the dialogue record, the businessman also reminds Li Haifeng not to forget to report to the police, and has provided own name, the ID card number. At 10:33 a.m. on April 24th, Li Haifengs cell phone received two messages, I hope you dont piss your pants. You cant do the bad reviews. You cant kneel down to me. At 10:37 in the morning of April 24th, Li Haifeng, who felt the threat, decided to reflect the problem to Taobao, and to the location of the shop, the Akesu City Public Security Bureau Command Center in Xinjiang. At 13:56 in the afternoon of April 24th, employees of Taobaos consumer hotline told Li Haifeng that, according to his feedback, they had reported to their superiors and will be fed back according to the results of the survey. Li Haifeng said, there are old people and children in the family. Now some people are afraid of knocking at the door. I reflected the problem to Taobao. They asked for a screenshot. Now, 24 hours later, they have not replied yet. Li Haifeng said that after many links, he made several death threats to the Akesu police. At 17:58 p.m. on April 24th, a police officer named Hou surnamed Akesu contacted Li Haifeng. In Li Haifengs dialogue, the reporter found that the local police had found the party and confirmed that the other party did claim the threat of blood washing the whole family, and also confirmed that the ticket was indeed purchased. Li Haifeng is not satisfied with the handling of the police. The police said that they were not threatened by verbal threats and verbal threats, so they could not be punished by administrative detention according to the regulations. Li Haifeng told reporters that the police also told him that the reason why left a ticket for 5 days is to leave room for compromise. At 17:20 p.m. on April 25th, Li Haifeng told reporters that Akesu police contacted him for the 2 time in the afternoon to communicate. At 17:31 in the afternoon of April 25th, the reporter called the Taobao network consumer service hotline. After the staff inquired, the reporter confirmed to the reporter: according to the record of the complaint, it showed that the merchant was abusive, harassed the buyer and threatened to kill him. Zhu Wei, an associate professor at China University of Political Science and Law, commented on the matter. According to the forty-second article of the law on the administration of public security, transmissions of obscene, insult, intimidation or other information to interfere with the normal life of others, where the circumstances are more than five days and more than ten days, can be punished with a fine of less than 500 yuan. Punishment. The merchants threat behavior has violated laws and regulations, but whether the criminal offence is established may still be controversial. Zhu Wei said. Beijing Yuecheng law firm partner Yue said that the threat to the serious threat to personal safety should be timely alarm, the public security department should be timely, to act as a deterrent. At the same time, it is necessary to set up a trading platform to deal with the merchants who are threatening consumers. The fundamental reason is that such businesses are not punished. Source: Peoples network editor: Bai Xin _NT4464 Beijing Yuecheng law firm partner Yue said that the threat to the serious threat to personal safety should be timely alarm, the public security department should be timely, to act as a deterrent. At the same time, it is necessary to set up a trading platform to deal with the merchants who are threatening consumers. The fundamental reason is that such businesses are not punished.