Enforcement of copyright infringement between Qiong Yao and Yu Zheng in Beijing No.3 middle court

category:Global
 Enforcement of copyright infringement between Qiong Yao and Yu Zheng in Beijing No.3 middle court


Bulletin of the fourth edition of the Legal Daily Beijing No. 3 middle court formally filed a case in January 2, 2018, accepting the case of Chen Zhe (Qiong Yao) applying for enforcement of the remaining (Yu Zheng) infringement of copyright. The application executive Chen Zhe (Qiong Yao) requested that the main content of the judgment be published in the Legal Daily, and the cost will be borne by the executor Yu Zheng (Yu Zheng). In accordance with the requirements of the implementation of this case, an apology should be published in the Sina, Sohu, music network and phoenix net in ten days from the date of the entry into force of the decision. The apology will be publicly apologized to Chen Zhe, to eliminate the influence and to be overdue, and the third intermediate peoples Court of Beijing will publish the verdict in the Legal Daily. For content, the cost required is borne by the surplus. Execution time January 2018 After the case, in order to verify the performance of the person to be carried out, the executive judge of the third central hospital has called the executor Yu Zheng (Yu Zheng) for many times by calling the applicant Chen Zhe (Qiong Yao), but all of them have been prompted to close the machine. 2018.01.12 In order to actively facilitate the applicant to carry out the content of the decision, the executive team mailed the notice of execution and the subpoenas to the executors domicile and the executors residence, but the relevant judicial post was returned. January 2018 In the same month, the executive team of the hospital contacted the agent of the executor through the review of the trial file, but it said that it did not act as a proxy for the execution of the case, nor did it retain the way of contact with the original client. 2018.01.25 The execution team informed the case through the micro-blog of the executor, but did not receive any response. 2018.02.08 The executive team goes to the company where the executor is located to find the executor and deliver the relevant legal documents. The companys front desk refuses to receive the delivery document on the grounds of the execution of the person who is not in the company and cannot receive legal documents for it. The execution team sent a summons to the domicile, habitual residence and residence of the executed person again. 2018.03.08 The executor entrusts the agent to the third middle court for the first time. 2018.03.19 During the second conversation, the executed agent indicated that he had not fulfilled his obligation of apologizing, but he was in contact with the applicant for enforcement. Later, the agent of Chen Zhe, who applied for execution, indicated that he did not accept the conditions for the execution of conciliation put forward by the third Central Hospital, and demanded the third central hospital to enforce it. 2018.04.26 The Beijing Third Central Hospital published the case in the fourth edition of the Legal Daily in the fourth edition of the Legal Daily. Full text of the bulletin The source of this article is the editor of Beijing law network affairs: Huang Zhecheng _B9302