US France has tit for tat for Irans new Iran nuclear agreement

category:Military
 US France has tit for tat for Irans new Iran nuclear agreement


President Hassan Rouhani of Iran questioned the right of leaders of the US and France to decide on the Iranian nuclear agreement reached by the 7 countries. [American Law At the 24 - day press conference, Trump said that Iran made problems in the Middle East, and the Iran agreement should cover Yemen, Syria and other regions in the Middle East in 2015, restricting Irans strong involvement in regional affairs in the geopolitical field. The West identified Iran as the transfer of missiles and missile technologies to allies such as the Yemen huhse and Lebanese Hezbollah, as well as the military intervention in the Syria civil war to maintain the Syrian government. Trump said he would look at the possibility of creating a well - founded new agreement; in May 12th, his own deadline for revising the Iraq nuclear agreement, what will happen to you? At the same stage with Trump, Ma told media reporters that the current Iran agreement was inadequate and should be added to 3 pillars, limiting Irans nuclear activities, ballistic missile projects and influence in the Middle East after 2025. Mr Ma said his discussion with Trump made it possible to open a new agreement and pave the way, and the French side would like to cooperate with Iran on the new agreement, but not to tear up an agreement, but to create a new thing that covers all our concerns. Reuters reported that at the press conference, no real progress was made in the efforts of Mr Trump to persuade him not to withdraw from the Iran nuclear agreement. A French government official said: today (24) the morning of the important content, but also new content, President Trump agreed to join with France, the idea of a new agreement on the table, to the Iran people and to make consultations. In January, Trump asked Britain, France and Germany to agree to the amendment of the Iraqi nuclear agreement before May 12th, otherwise the United States would withdraw from the agreement and resume the sanctions against Iraq. In the Iraq nuclear agreement, Trump asked to join the restrictions on the Iran ballistic missile program, giving the United Nations a greater power to verify Irans military facilities and deleting the sunset clause, that is, the agreement was lifted in 2025 to lift restrictions on Irans uranium enrichment activities. The State Department has made rounds of discussions with Britain, France and Germany. A senior US State Department official said on the 22 day that the parties views on ballistic missiles and verification were identical, and the sunset clause could not bridge differences. A source for internal discussion in the White House said the option in a discussion was to give time grace until the European side agreed to fix the terms of the Iraq nuclear agreement. [Iran tat The Iran government has said many times that it will not accept the new Iran agreement. President Rouhani of Iran said in a speech on the 25 th, they (US law leaders) said they would like to make a decision on the agreement reached by the 7 parties. What is the purpose? What rights do you have? Ali Shamkhani, the Secretary of the national supreme Security Committee of Iran, said at a press conference on 24 days that the withdrawal of the Treaty on non proliferation of nuclear weapons was one of the three options that Iran was considering to cope with the withdrawal of the United States from the Iraq nuclear agreement. Iran reached a nuclear agreement with the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany in 2015. According to the agreement, Iran stopped high enrichment of uranium, and was inspecting by the International Atomic Energy Agency; the international community lifted the sanctions against Iraq under the actual implementation of the agreement by the Iran. Iran foreign minister Mohamed Javad Zarif said in an interview with The Associated Press on 24 days, if the US side withdrew from the Iraq nuclear agreement, the Iraqi side was very likely to be immediately withdrawn, meaning that the Iraqi side will no longer be bound by the international obligations of the agreement, that is, it can restore much higher (uranium) concentration than the strict limit of the agreement. In those countries that are critical of Irans nuclear program, it will be completely different. The Associated Press reported that he was referring to some countries concerned about Irans development of nuclear weapons. The government of Iran says that the development of nuclear projects is for peaceful civil purposes only. Zarif said that although the Iran government does not advocate the withdrawal of the non proliferation treaty, some people in Iran have listed it as one of the options to cope with the withdrawal of the United States from the Iraq nuclear agreement. (Wu Baoshu) (Xinhua Special Edition) source: Xinhua editor in charge: Li Ying Ying _NBJS5961 Iran foreign minister Mohamed Javad Zarif said in an interview with The Associated Press on 24 days, if the US side withdrew from the Iraq nuclear agreement, the Iraqi side was very likely to be immediately withdrawn, meaning that the Iraqi side will no longer be bound by the international obligations of the agreement, that is, it can restore much higher (uranium) concentration than the strict limit of the agreement. In those countries that are critical of Irans nuclear program, it will be completely different. The Associated Press reported that he was referring to some countries concerned about Irans development of nuclear weapons. The government of Iran says that the development of nuclear projects is for peaceful civil purposes only. Zarif said that although the Iran government does not advocate the withdrawal of the non proliferation treaty, some people in Iran have listed it as one of the options to cope with the withdrawal of the United States from the Iraq nuclear agreement. (Wu Baoshu) (special draft of Xinhua News Agency)